Sociopath Community

MissCommunication said: 

Turncoat said: 

MissCommunication said: 

Turncoat said: 

MissCommunication said:

But if I missed something (cherry picked?) just post the comments that confirm an agreement with your view.

 ...you could try actually reading the other topic. 

Ignoring your weird narrative about what I'm doing that continues to reflect how much you aren't reading, are you not going to address how you're changing arguments back and forth to different tenses? 

I've read everything. It's not hard to follow. Maybe you should re-read.

Then why do you ask me redundant questions constantly, in general not just here, that are answered in other places? 

If you read everything and it's easy to follow, then you should have known a lot of these answers already, right? 

(You really need to come up with better retorts when you're flailing.) 

I keep having to use it about you because how are we supposed to have a real discussion if you don't even read the material? You go into know-it-all tones when you are missing tons of details. 

At this point I'm questioning if it's a forgetfulness thing, as some of what you ask me is more of a data collection answer in places you claim to have read that you've even posted in. 

Like did I just massively hallucinate all the past protocol topics we had on the old forum and the jokes/memes that followed it? 

lol dude, you don't even remember med posting her own pics while you were removing them. You also said you don't even remember Cad's dox. 

...what gave you the impression that I don't remember Cadaver being doxed? 

spite said: 

How about:

If you put it out there yourself, anywhere, not just here, and it's accessible to someone here, then it's your fault. Make your stuff private. Don't give people enough personal information to find your shit if you're worried about them embarrassing you with your empty LinkedIn profile. Internet 101. Didn't your parents tell you not to give out personal information to strangers? You think that applies to sending them selfies and shit? Duh.

But everyone has pictures of themselves out there someone else posted that they can't remove even if they wanted to. That's just life. Remove those from here. This covers business stuff like Cadaver, photos that friends and family post, etc. Things you have no personal control over. Mods will have to use their judgment to decide if this is actually the case for whatever image is in question, because I'm sure someone will lie and say it's a company photo or a family member's photo when it's not. Just leave people who aren't browsing SC out of it. Otherwise you're probably driving people away. 

 

The first paragraph is also wrong tho, because you are basically saying people should live like hermits if they chose to use the forum. My advice is to leave SC over living like a hermit.

So i think you should only count pics posted on this website.

Good said: 

I've treated it like this:

if a specific photo is posted by someone on SC by themselves, it becomes a non-dox photo.

if this photo is reposted by others while its a non-dox the reposts are also non-dox

if ever all instances of this photo in its non-dox state are somehow deleted (even those posted by others), then this photo is now a dox and can be requested to be removed if reposted again.

Ofc if another photo, even if showing the same body part/s, is posted by others, it is a dox.

 

I didn't know it extends to family tho.

Turncoat said: 

MissCommunication said: 

Turncoat said: 

MissCommunication said: 

Turncoat said: 

MissCommunication said:

But if I missed something (cherry picked?) just post the comments that confirm an agreement with your view.

 ...you could try actually reading the other topic. 

Ignoring your weird narrative about what I'm doing that continues to reflect how much you aren't reading, are you not going to address how you're changing arguments back and forth to different tenses? 

I've read everything. It's not hard to follow. Maybe you should re-read.

Then why do you ask me redundant questions constantly, in general not just here, that are answered in other places? 

If you read everything and it's easy to follow, then you should have known a lot of these answers already, right? 

(You really need to come up with better retorts when you're flailing.) 

I keep having to use it about you because how are we supposed to have a real discussion if you don't even read the material? You go into know-it-all tones when you are missing tons of details. 

At this point I'm questioning if it's a forgetfulness thing, as some of what you ask me is more of a data collection answer in places you claim to have read that you've even posted in. 

Like did I just massively hallucinate all the past protocol topics we had on the old forum and the jokes/memes that followed it? 

lol dude, you don't even remember med posting her own pics while you were removing them. You also said you don't even remember Cad's dox. 

...what gave you the impression that I don't remember Cadaver being doxed? 

 

 Cos you claimed that in Legga's thread. Don't you remember saying that?? :D

MissCommunication said: 

Turncoat said: 

MissCommunication said: 

Turncoat said: 

MissCommunication said: 

Turncoat said: 

MissCommunication said:

But if I missed something (cherry picked?) just post the comments that confirm an agreement with your view.

 ...you could try actually reading the other topic. 

Ignoring your weird narrative about what I'm doing that continues to reflect how much you aren't reading, are you not going to address how you're changing arguments back and forth to different tenses? 

I've read everything. It's not hard to follow. Maybe you should re-read.

Then why do you ask me redundant questions constantly, in general not just here, that are answered in other places? 

If you read everything and it's easy to follow, then you should have known a lot of these answers already, right? 

(You really need to come up with better retorts when you're flailing.) 

I keep having to use it about you because how are we supposed to have a real discussion if you don't even read the material? You go into know-it-all tones when you are missing tons of details. 

At this point I'm questioning if it's a forgetfulness thing, as some of what you ask me is more of a data collection answer in places you claim to have read that you've even posted in. 

Like did I just massively hallucinate all the past protocol topics we had on the old forum and the jokes/memes that followed it? 

lol dude, you don't even remember med posting her own pics while you were removing them. You also said you don't even remember Cad's dox. 

...what gave you the impression that I don't remember Cadaver being doxed? 

 Cos you claimed that in Legga's thread. Don't you remember saying that?? :D

I remember saying I don't know his name or where he lives, but knew his company and face..? 

 MissCommunication said: 
 Inq's list can be said to only have anecdotal evidence, although Cad's dox is verifiable.

Turncoat said: 
I haven't seen it so it's just hearsay at the moment. 

 https://sociopathcommunity.com/Forum/Topic/1039/25/legga-exposed-as-a-liar#newPost

Okay since I seem to be the Henrietta Lacks of the forum (study subject) let me clarify a few inaccuracies.

I never posted my Instagram to discord or otherwise. I maintained a store for my shirts and skateboard decks, whose name may or may not have been similar. I shared that on discord.

Also since Good’s sc I have NOT shared photos in public chat—blue tint or otherwise.

The rule seems to be down on request if not posted here and to wit: I have had photos “appear here” from my Instagram account even appearing with handle in plain view. You know I don’t mean appear here, persons have posted them!

bleary said: 

Okay since I seem to be the Henrietta Lacks of the forum (study subject) let me clarify a few inaccuracies.

I never posted my Instagram to discord or otherwise. I maintained a store for my shirts and skateboard decks, whose name may or may not have been similar. I shared that on discord.

Also since Good’s sc I have NOT shared photos in public chat—blue tint or otherwise.

The rule seems to be down on request if not posted here and to wit: I have had photos “appear here” from my Instagram account even appearing with handle in plain view. You know I don’t mean appear here, persons have posted them!

I've not seen you post your pics here either, however, you've also requested pics that do not reveal you to be removed. Like TC's avatar, I am not saying you wanted that one specifically removed, but pics like his.

MissCommunication said: 

 MissCommunication said: 
 Inq's list can be said to only have anecdotal evidence, although Cad's dox is verifiable.

Turncoat said: 
I haven't seen it so it's just hearsay at the moment. 

https://sociopathcommunity.com/Forum/Topic/1039/25/legga-exposed-as-a-liar#newPost

The topic elaborates further than that, and I've said I knew of his company only through that one user that literally named himself after it for his puppet. 

I'd otherwise seen his face through some DMs, not the event itself. When this happened to him it was when Crave was still a thing, and otherwise Cad wasn't really on my radar much, meaning it likely ranges between Edgecomm and my straight up not being on any forum. 

I don't have his name and as I argued in that topic over logistics of if his info could be used to confirm forum Swedes, the info I supposedly have could easily be false. I'd also never looked up the company's location from having had no reason to really look into Cad at all prior to the Legga topic. 

bleary said: 

Also since Good’s sc I have NOT shared photos in public chat—blue tint or otherwise.

We've grandfathered in a lot of prior clauses from the older forum. People who had never shown themselves that wish to keep it that way didn't suddenly need to re-request it, and what was in that place's post history was otherwise established for a while. 

bleary said: 

Okay since I seem to be the Henrietta Lacks of the forum (study subject) let me clarify a few inaccuracies.

I never posted my Instagram to discord or otherwise. I maintained a store for my shirts and skateboard decks, whose name may or may not have been similar. I shared that on discord.

Also since Good’s sc I have NOT shared photos in public chat—blue tint or otherwise.

The rule seems to be down on request if not posted here and to wit: I have had photos “appear here” from my Instagram account even appearing with handle in plain view. You know I don’t mean appear here, persons have posted them!

 Your Instagram name were on those competition billboard ad that you kept posting. 

You shared a picture of streamfreak, once again doxing someone else and then screeching when you are doxed. You protected only yourself in that picture seen here 

Here are your green/blue tint pictures that you've claimed to have never shared on sc, chat or otherwise

Thanks for deleting them off of imgur I guess but mostly thanks for showing that you lie to get your way.