Sociopath Community

Turncoat said: 

Whorechata said: 

Turncoat said: 

This includes pictures and videos, address, social medias, phone numbers and workplace/location.

What about family? That can literally share your last name and lead to all sorts of information through far more back-searching than "friends". You before were going on about how said family member would have to sign up to fix it, but at the very least Spatial, myself, and Inq by participation credit have been taking down family records on the same notion. 

Also for pictures and videos, are you going with if it reveal more information about them than was previously known, or if it's literally a different image? 

Stop exposing my loopholes this is all I have left I hate you 👿👿👿

We'll add in family to this dox definition. Sure, fine. If it is something the member/victim shared has not shared themselves and is snagged off of social media by others it is considered dox. 

Basically anything that is not an exact replica of what the member freely shared is considered dox. 

So a photo of the same person in literally the same scene from a different angle would count as "more"? 

If lets say... someone posts photos of me I didn't post myself, it'd be able to be taken down no questions asked even though I've now posted my own face multiple times? 

 Yes. 

Because they were pictures you shared privately with someone you obviously shouldn't have trusted, and not say with the forum at large it is considered a dox. Especially since you in particular heavily filter your avatar pictures.

Turncoat said: 

Whorechata said: 

Turncoat said: 

Whorechata said: 

Turncoat said: 

This includes pictures and videos, address, social medias, phone numbers and workplace/location.

What about family? That can literally share your last name and lead to all sorts of information through far more back-searching than "friends". You before were going on about how said family member would have to sign up to fix it, but at the very least Spatial, myself, and Inq by participation credit have been taking down family records on the same notion. 

Also for pictures and videos, are you going with if it reveal more information about them than was previously known, or if it's literally a different image? 

 Stop exposing my loopholes this is all I have left I hate you 👿👿👿

It'd still surface again later, I mean ffs they forgot all the time spent on rule lawyering this stuff out, so in all honesty setting a precedent here could just as easily be ignored later if they feel like it. 

 If we set it here, it can be screenshot and bumped

They'll just be like "Rules are meant to be changed and the community wants a hugbox now". 

Permanence is only as strong as it's consistency, but as people like Ed and TPG leave we get to see the "people need to be protected from themselves" people gain more of a voice while many of our protesters will be either apathetic or easily written off. 

 Rules aren't mean to be change on the whim of one person, they are decided upon as a community. While I am personally disgusted at the thought that this community will continue to turn into a fucking hugbox I still stand by the act of making and agreeing on rules as a community. Everyone has a chance to speak upon the rules and those that do not, have no place to complain. Although due to the heaviness of this thread a new one should be made. 

Then perhaps it's time to move on. SC died long ago.

Whorechata said: 

Turncoat said: 

Whorechata said: 

Turncoat said: 

This includes pictures and videos, address, social medias, phone numbers and workplace/location.

What about family? That can literally share your last name and lead to all sorts of information through far more back-searching than "friends". You before were going on about how said family member would have to sign up to fix it, but at the very least Spatial, myself, and Inq by participation credit have been taking down family records on the same notion. 

Also for pictures and videos, are you going with if it reveal more information about them than was previously known, or if it's literally a different image? 

Stop exposing my loopholes this is all I have left I hate you 👿👿👿

We'll add in family to this dox definition. Sure, fine. If it is something the member/victim shared has not shared themselves and is snagged off of social media by others it is considered dox. 

Basically anything that is not an exact replica of what the member freely shared is considered dox. 

So a photo of the same person in literally the same scene from a different angle would count as "more"? 

If lets say... someone posts photos of me I didn't post myself, it'd be able to be taken down no questions asked even though I've now posted my own face multiple times? 

Yes. 

Because they were pictures you shared privately with someone you obviously shouldn't have trusted, and not say with the forum at large it is considered a dox. Especially since you in particular heavily filter your avatar pictures.

See, I figure from me posting my own face that it'd make my face free game for anyone else to post. 

Yeah, with it being filtered it could be rules lawyered to not be "the same", but at least for myself as myself I'd figure it's showing about just as much with... I dunno, the added bonus of my hair color or something? 

As far as I am concerned in relation to the former practices, my posting my face in the selfie topic makes my face in other expressions open to be posted here. It's not revealing anything more than otherwise unless it's literally within the workplace or surrounded by family members or some shit. 

Barring some excessive reverse search paranoia, it's essentially fighting for a vanity clause when you say some pictures are okay and others are not when it's not otherwise showing more than you yourself have shown. My wearing a red shirt in one photo and green in another for instance shouldn't be acceptable grounds to keep one photo over the other. 

Whorechata said: 

Turncoat said: 

Whorechata said: 

Turncoat said: 

Whorechata said: 

Turncoat said: 

This includes pictures and videos, address, social medias, phone numbers and workplace/location.

What about family? That can literally share your last name and lead to all sorts of information through far more back-searching than "friends". You before were going on about how said family member would have to sign up to fix it, but at the very least Spatial, myself, and Inq by participation credit have been taking down family records on the same notion. 

Also for pictures and videos, are you going with if it reveal more information about them than was previously known, or if it's literally a different image? 

 Stop exposing my loopholes this is all I have left I hate you 👿👿👿

It'd still surface again later, I mean ffs they forgot all the time spent on rule lawyering this stuff out, so in all honesty setting a precedent here could just as easily be ignored later if they feel like it. 

 If we set it here, it can be screenshot and bumped

They'll just be like "Rules are meant to be changed and the community wants a hugbox now". 

Permanence is only as strong as it's consistency, but as people like Ed and TPG leave we get to see the "people need to be protected from themselves" people gain more of a voice while many of our protesters will be either apathetic or easily written off. 

Rules aren't mean to be change on the whim of one person, they are decided upon as a community. While I am personally disgusted at the thought that this community will continue to turn into a fucking hugbox I still stand by the act of making and agreeing on rules as a community. 

But what do you do when the community all has separate ideas, and figure that just posting their opinion and ignoring the topic otherwise as a whole is enough? 

They always end up missing the point or saying it's wasted effort until a mod runs in and just changes things unasked. 

Everyone has a chance to speak upon the rules and those that do not, have no place to complain. Although due to the heaviness of this thread a new one should be made. 

You mean a third topic? 

Then perhaps it's time to move on. SC died long ago.

Waxing nostalgia typically just shows where people's original naive glow died. Any time they call "the glory days" isn't any different than BR going on about how he used to be king during SC4. 

I just don't see how people can want to push hugbox practices, then sit back and complain that this place has become so sterilized. 

This is a relevant topic yet again

I hate this place. All this arguing for nothing all because a crybaby rapist made meta suck his dick 

Whorechata said: 

I hate this place. All this arguing for nothing all because a crybaby rapist made meta suck his dick 

 then fuck off

Good said: 

Whorechata said: 

I hate this place. All this arguing for nothing all because a crybaby rapist made meta suck his dick 

 then fuck off

 Yeah i fuckin will because you've become Luna 2.0, especially with the "sc 2.0 is coming soon i don't want to make changes because the new forum is in the works" bullshit.

Whorechata said: 

Good said: 

Whorechata said: 

I hate this place. All this arguing for nothing all because a crybaby rapist made meta suck his dick 

 then fuck off

 Yeah i fuckin will because you've become Luna 2.0, especially with the "sc 2.0 is coming soon i don't want to make changes because the new forum is in the works" bullshit.

Good

I believe the saying once went 'Meta is Meat and We Gotta Eat'.