What'll your reasoning be if it doesn't go your way without Jim around, Ed?
For once you're going to need to cook up a new story.
Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Even if you don't want to ban for CP, and an expressed intent to rape minors-
can we at least get a little jurisdiction surrounding the issue of spam, which is a fair rule applied to everyone.
he is notorious for extreme spam, in the chat and in the threads. constantly.
to the point that it's nuisance. this is grounds for ban, and yet he still hasn't gotten one.
and if you really still won't ban, there should be a rule about pedophilia related posts to be kept to one thread, and no graphic avatars.
last edit on
7/23/2019 2:57:56 PM
What'll your reasoning be if it doesn't go your way without Jim around, Ed?
For once you're going to need to cook up a new story.
You mean, if you do nothing about Cawk's pedo spam just because you think this would be "me having my way"? You should put the needs of the community before your petty squabbles, TC. You failed to do it when we were both mods, and it didn't go too well, did it.
I just want other people to read this shit and be confused whether it's part of the post or not.
last edit on
7/23/2019 2:57:59 PM
whatever they do in prisons, it's just a justification for intrinsically homicidal desires, I don't think they care that much about kiddie fiddlers
Well maybe we are all feeling homicidal against Cawk then.
I just want other people to read this shit and be confused whether it's part of the post or not.
Even if you don't want to ban for CP, and an expressed intent to rape minors-
Hasn't been on his main account.
can we at least get a little jurisdiction surrounding the issue of spam, which is a fair rule applied to everyone.
That's fair.
he is notorious for extreme spam, in the chat and in the threads. constantly.
He's kept it to a fair minimum, but it is getting a little drippy in place of the flood risks we were worrying over before.
Before when I tried to discuss fair minimums people were fine with "as long as it's not more than a page". It hasn't been, but I suppose those terms could be renegotiated.
to the point that it's nuisance. this is grounds for ban, and yet he still hasn't gotten one.
It's definitely worth the discussion.
and if you really still won't ban, there should be a rule about pedophilia related posts to be kept to one thread, and no graphic avatars.
This is where it's just your intolerance showing.
What'll your reasoning be if it doesn't go your way without Jim around, Ed?
For once you're going to need to cook up a new story.You mean, if you do nothing about Cawk's pedo spam just because you think this would be "me having my way"? You should put the needs of the community before your petty squabbles, TC. You failed to do it when we were both mods, and it didn't go too well, did it.
Damn that didn't take long, and it even has you praising your ego in it.
Guess you've gone from cooking to microwaving.
Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on
7/23/2019 3:04:16 PM
