Anyone noticing it?
More like your hysterical hatred of it.
Well damn, nice to notice a slop lover, fucking slave to clankers, disrespect.
Anyone noticing it?
It's 2026 so stuff like that is nothing new.
.
.
.
There's a difference between Ai and Ai slop, and that is, low effort and high effort.
Low effort would be a video with a voice talking about shit you never knew while showing random footage, or a series of images. There's also the kind of Ai that looks real but poorly executed, bad sound design and publishing bad/glitchy takes. This creates a bias toward Ai.
Low effort is what it is. We see the same with animation, music, art what have you done by people.
Other day a member posted globglogabgalab, and what we saw was low effort CGI, horrible modeling, the boxy head on the character wasn't by design, it's lazy modeling from an artist that never took the time to finish up turning a cube into a head. The weights were painted horribly and the animation was shit. No animator in their right mind would put that on their demo reel.
Something like that happens with Ai but in different ways. Poor sound design and content that's utter shit. The major issue with Ai slop in my opinion is how fast it can be made and posted.
Regardless of how good something is, people have a bias.
Here's an example.
Doesn't matter how it's made, it's been done.
That video is made with Unreal Engine. Obviously motion capture and some crazy facial technology to create such expressions. Aside from that, if you told some people it's Ai, they would dismiss it right away. And I'm not saying everyone would like this videos content, but for some, what determines what they like depends on what they're "supposed" to like or dislike out of prejudice.
I can post something nice made with Ai, but no need, anyone can do that.
Well damn, nice to notice a slop lover, fucking slave to clankers, disrespect.
As if you don't want people enslaved to something else. It's projection. You're attacking an alternative resource that offers independence, which makes your position far closer to advocating dependency and servitude. Being enslaved by clankers is way better than being enslaved by only humans.
Well damn, nice to notice a slop lover, fucking slave to clankers, disrespect.
As if you don't want people enslaved to something else. It's projection. You're attacking an alternative resource that offers independence, which makes your position far closer to advocating dependency and servitude. Being enslaved by clankers is way better than being enslaved by only humans.
Ai offering independence is debatable.
What makes Ai possible today is capitalism. The largest corporation in the world is Nvidia.
( Amazing. As video games required more magic/horsepower/processing from computing and now what used to be used as a toy, the GPU and processing units like it has become an appreciating asset )
The world will eventually depend on corporation placing a meter on intelligence. This is SO important corporations are willing to take massive hits just to be able to afford building Ai and the Ai race is costing them dearly.
There will be more powerful local Ai we can run at home as good as what the data centers provide today, but the hardware for it will be like buying an expensive car. Those machines will age and be sold second hand and while it's not the latest and greatest the models they run locally will be very useful. Still as it is today, the best Ai will be ran off the Data centers, which aren't cheap to produce maintain and run.
Personally I'm becoming more codependent on artificial intelligence which at this point isn't a good name for it anymore. I don't really need to use it but damn, no arguing life is better when we can do more at such a cost financially and time.
Ai offering independence is debatable.
What makes Ai possible today is capitalism. The largest corporation in the world is Nvidia.
Incorrect. What makes AI possible are the tech and construction workers. Passive income (capitalism) is unrelated.