Sociopath Community

Spatial Mind said: 

I don't have any of your personal information for starters. Don't know your name, or where you live. Haven't got your work address or employer name. No social security or identification. Don't have you on discord, nor any social media.  

I have an image of you and had it for over a year, that YOU posted here. You wanted us to see it, that is a public image. It could still be on here for all I know. I'm also under the impression you might be attempting reverse psychology on me with your gaslighting. Don't do that cause it's like begging me to bring that lie of yours to life with what little I have, and if I do that, it's not to harass you, it's to teach you a lesson about lying.   

Legga thinks you're a child too. Did you think you come across as mature? The rest of your post is uninteresting and irrelevant. Nothing more than a byproduct of your initial falsehoods.  

I didn't say you currently have my name, address, SSN, employer, etc. The point is that you explicitly brought up using whatever personal information you do have as retaliation for something I said.

You just said that if I supposedly "gaslight" you, you might "bring that lie to life with what little I have" and that you'd do it "to teach you a lesson." That's not a rebuttal to anything I said. It's an implied threat to escalate a disagreement beyond the actual argument by using personal information against me. (which is the definition of doxxing form what you just posted)

And the fact that an image was publicly posted doesn't make every possible use of information derived from it appropriate. Publicly posting a picture is not an invitation to investigate, identify, or retaliate against someone.

As for whether I "come across as mature," that's another attempt to turn a disagreement into a judgment about my character. You can think I'm immature if you want. It doesn't establish that anything I said was false. If the rest of my post is "uninteresting and irrelevant," then you should have no difficulty simply addressing the actual argument rather than bringing up what information you have about me and what you might do with it.

Dragoonback said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

I don't have any of your personal information for starters. Don't know your name, or where you live. Haven't got your work address or employer name. No social security or identification. Don't have you on discord, nor any social media.  

I have an image of you and had it for over a year, that YOU posted here. You wanted us to see it, that is a public image. It could still be on here for all I know. I'm also under the impression you might be attempting reverse psychology on me with your gaslighting. Don't do that cause it's like begging me to bring that lie of yours to life with what little I have, and if I do that, it's not to harass you, it's to teach you a lesson about lying.   

Legga thinks you're a child too. Did you think you come across as mature? The rest of your post is uninteresting and irrelevant. Nothing more than a byproduct of your initial falsehoods.  

I didn't say you currently have my name, address, SSN, employer, etc. The point is that you explicitly brought up using whatever personal information you do have as retaliation for something I said.

The point wasn't that, the point was you claiming that I throw out other people's information. This has been going on since page one on this thread.

It then turned into you claiming that I did it to you.

You just said that if I supposedly "gaslight" you, you might "bring that lie to life with what little I have" and that you'd do it "to teach you a lesson." That's not a rebuttal to anything I said. It's an implied threat to escalate a disagreement beyond the actual argument by using personal information against me. (which is the definition of doxxing form what you just posted)

The definition I posted, is the only definition of doxxing. Where do you learn English from ?

I never posted any of your information before, but since you want to lie about it, I just might make it true.

Such is the way of chronic cynicism where the subject, that being you, will be the cause of your own concerns.  While I had no intention to post your image, I now have no problem doing so, simply because you said I did. You're either that far gone, or you're trying to manipulate me into making some pact. 

And the fact that an image was publicly posted doesn't make every possible use of information derived from it appropriate. Publicly posting a picture is not an invitation to investigate, identify, or retaliate against someone.

lol so why are you begging me to bring it out ?

You're still missing the point: even if I originally posted the image publicly, that only explains how you obtained it, not that I consented to you retaining it for years, repeatedly using it to insult me, trying to obtain more personal details, or threatening to distribute it for retaliatory purposes. By the very definition of doxxing you posted earlier, publicly revealing someone's personal information without permission for purposes such as harassment, threatening, shaming, or scaring them is what matters, so your stated intention to post it specifically because I criticized you is directly relevant regardless of its original source. I'm not begging you to post anything or trying to make a pact with you, and calling my caution "chronic cynicism" doesn't change that your own retaliatory threats are the reason I have less reason to trust you with my information. You keep reducing my argument to "you claimed I already doxxed you," but that's not what I said: I said your pattern of retaining and bringing up personal information, combined with your current threat to disclose mine, gives me reason not to trust you with it. Personal information does not somehow cease being personal simply because part of it was publicly posted for a different purpose and your own intentions/threats prove that you internally recognize that something can be public, personal, and also intended for other purposes than malice/weaponization no matter if you deny it. Yes bringing up details about me (for malicious purposes) is posting information since that seems to be part of the semantics you are trying to do.

But I never threatened to use it against you before in any way. As mentioned that doesn't work for me, nor do I find any appeal in becoming the type of person I dislike. 

I don't need your consent to save your image when you post it on my screen, just as I'll never need anyone's consent to save an image that appears on my screen. 

.

Yes I did say you're scrawny and look like an Antifa member. ( You also act like one ) Heh. And you feel doxxed all of a sudden. Maybe because you are what I say. 

When you post your image on a public forum. Prepare for feedback. That's how the world works. 

Don't blame me if you regret posting your image in public. 

I never said you needed my consent merely to save an image that appeared on your screen; I'm saying that possessing it does not give you consent to later use or distribute it against me, especially after retaining it for years and repeatedly using my appearance as an insult. "Prepare for feedback" doesn't establish unlimited consent either, because posting an image publicly for one purpose does not mean I consented to every future use of it, particularly retaliatory or harassing use. You also previously said you might make my concern a "self fulfilling prophecy" by posting my information specifically because I accused you of doing so, so denying that you threatened to use it against me doesn't erase what you actually said. And saying I'm "what you say" doesn't establish anything about me; it just treats your own characterization of me as evidence for itself.

If anything, "prepare for feedback" applies more to you than it does to me. Posting an image publicly does not mean I consented to you repeatedly bringing up my appearance for years as an unprompted insult, and calling that "feedback" just sanitizes the behavior you're actually engaging in. If you're going to play hostile and retaliatory games with people, you should be prepared for people to criticize your behavior and point out the implications of what you say instead of belittling them for reacting. You don't get to call your own insults "feedback" while treating criticism of your behavior as some pathological reaction.

Dragoonback said: 

I never said you needed my consent merely to save an image that appeared on your screen; I'm saying that possessing it does not give you consent to later use or distribute it against me, especially after retaining it for years and repeatedly using my appearance as an insult.

I don't make fun of people's appearance. All I did was give feedback on what I see.

You are white, and you are skinny, and you look like an antifa activist. You're insulted by this ? 

Jada said: 

 

I think I might be in love with Xena. She's my Bella Donna. 

 😊

You're Scandinavian, right?

Spatial Mind said: 

Dragoonback said: 

I never said you needed my consent merely to save an image that appeared on your screen; I'm saying that possessing it does not give you consent to later use or distribute it against me, especially after retaining it for years and repeatedly using my appearance as an insult.

I don't make fun of people's appearance. All I did was give feedback on what I see.

You are white, and you are skinny, and you look like an antifa activist. You're insulted by this ? 

 You're doing the same thing again by relabeling insults as "feedback." Saying I'm white or skinny is descriptive, but repeatedly bringing up my appearance, calling me "boyish," comparing me to an Antifa activist, and using those descriptions to belittle me isn't somehow neutral just because you call it feedback. And this isn't even everything you've said about my appearance before, so pretending those are the only things you've ever said is another way of minimizing the pattern rather than addressing it. If you don't want your behavior characterized as insulting, then maybe you should prepare for feedback when people point out what you're actually doing.

Jada said: 

fine. I don't believe you're 30 though.

When I was 14 on the internet I told everyone I was 25. I thought that by pretending to be older people would take me more seriously.

I don't really care whether I'm taken seriously or seen as mature. I guess I care about it to some extent, mainly because I don't want to feed into people's desire for sadism, ego reinforcement, or hierarchy. But my main reason for being here is just to share my views on Moksha, antinatalism, and whatever other opinions or interests I have.

I think some of what I say can come across differently because I'm deliberately trying not to participate in those status games. Other times, I simply don't care how I'm perceived. In that sense, I actually think a certain degree of "devil may care" is valuable. If Samsara is partly about continually reinforcing attachment, ego, and hierarchy, then being willing to stop caring about those things can be a way of breaking that cycle rather than constantly playing along with it.