Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
3 / 53 posts
Posts: 1123
0 votes RE: Diagnose/analyze members

Public domain data: Publishing details that were already legally accessible in public records or voluntarily posted on public social media profiles. Lack of specific statute: Many jurisdictions do not have a dedicated criminal charge explicitly named "doxxing," meaning prosecutors must rely on general laws covering mischief, harassment, or uttering threats. Dude posted the picture himself. I did not need his consent to save it.

I don't even remember where I originally posted that image. It may have been a DM or a temporary upload rather than something I left publicly accessible. So you're treating “you posted it yourself” as though you've established that it was permanently public, when you haven't. And even if it was publicly posted, publicly accessible does not mean public domain.

More importantly, this is exactly why I have reason to keep further personal information away from you. You retained an old image I don't even remember publicly leaving up, have repeatedly brought it up for years, use it as an ad hominem, and now insist that I have no right to object because I supposedly “posted it.” Your response to my concern is itself evidence that I have a rational reason to be cautious about what information I give you.

last edit on 8/15/2026 10:39:06 AM
Posts: 4267
0 votes RE: Diagnose/analyze members

Public domain data: Publishing details that were already legally accessible in public records or voluntarily posted on public social media profiles. Lack of specific statute: Many jurisdictions do not have a dedicated criminal charge explicitly named "doxxing," meaning prosecutors must rely on general laws covering mischief, harassment, or uttering threats. Dude posted the picture himself. I did not need his consent to save it.

I don't even remember where I originally posted that image. It may have been a DM or a temporary upload rather than something I left publicly accessible. So you're treating “you posted it yourself” as though you've established that it was permanently public, when you haven't. And even if it was publicly posted, publicly accessible does not mean public domain.

It was posted here. It wasn't DM'd to me, nor did anyone else share it with me. You shared it. Now I have your image.  

 

More importantly, this is exactly why I have reason to keep further personal information away from you. You retained an old image I don't even remember publicly leaving up, have repeatedly brought it up for years, use it as an ad hominem, and now insist that I have no right to object because I supposedly “posted it.” Your response to my concern is itself evidence that I have a rational reason to be cautious about what information I give you.

 I don't recall ever making fun of the way you look, I don't like that. Don't think you've been around for years if I had to be honest. 

You did post it. How else would I have it ? lol.

Here's what I know. 

If I started posting your image, people would be disappointed in me. I'm supposed to be the good guy. This is why when I start to get a bit rough, it makes people cringe in ways their own ego takes damage. If I posted your image and started making fun of you, I will take more damage than you. I honestly believe that. And why ? Because I really don't have to do that with you. It's not pretty when I'm the predator.  

Posts: 1123
0 votes RE: Diagnose/analyze members

It was posted here. It wasn't DM'd to me, nor did anyone else share it with me. You shared it. Now I have your image. I don't recall ever making fun of the way you look, I don't like that. Don't think you've been around for years if I had to be honest. You did post it. How else would I have it ? lol. Here's what I know. If I started posting your image, people would be disappointed in me. I'm supposed to be the good guy. This is why when I start to get a bit rough, it makes people cringe in ways their own ego takes damage. If I posted your image and started making fun of you, I will take more damage than you. I honestly believe that. And why ? Because I really don't have to do that with you. It's not pretty when I'm the predator.  

You're also mocking me for claiming that I never posted the image, which isn't what I said. I said I don't remember where I originally posted it and that it may have been a temporary upload on the forums or something similar. Those are completely different claims.

“You did post it. How else would I have it? lol” doesn't address what I actually said. I'm not disputing that you obtained it from something I posted. I'm pointing out that you haven't established the context in which I posted it, and that posting something somewhere once doesn't amount to perpetual consent for you to retain it, repeatedly bring it up, or use it against me. Publicly accessible also does not mean public domain.

You're also factually wrong about how long I've been around. We've been interacting for years, and there are previous instances of you making comments about my appearance. So “I don't think you've been around for years” and “I don't recall ever making fun of the way you look” don't match the history of our interactions. Given how often you mock, insult, and belittle people yourself, it's also not particularly convincing to suddenly claim you don't remember doing this to me. You may not remember those exchanges, but that doesn't make my account false.

And your last paragraph is actually more revealing than you seem to realize. You aren't simply saying, “I respect people's boundaries.” You're framing the issue as being the “good guy” versus becoming the “predator,” and talking about who would take more “damage” if you posted my image. That's a status and self-image calculation. You're essentially admitting that part of your restraint comes from what doing it would do to your own reputation and identity.

That also makes your claim that I'm falsely calling you “untrustworthy” harder to sustain. Your own description, your handling of my image, and your retaliatory comments about potentially posting my information all give me more reason to be cautious about what information I give you.
3 / 53 posts
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.