Sociopath Community

How tall are you ?

Spatial Mind said: 

How tall are you? 

Earlier:
Dragoonback said: 
The point is not whether your own information was exposed voluntarily. The issue is the broader principle around personal information. You criticize doxxing and involving families when it is done to you, but your own descriptions include involving other people's information and relationships during conflicts. If exposing personal information is considered harmful, that standard should apply consistently regardless of who does it or why.

The original situation does not automatically justify every response afterward. The issue is the pattern of how conflicts are framed and handled.
 
Spatial Mind: Oh really? And who did I dox?
Dragoonback: Didn't say you "dox." I said you throw out other people's personal information. 
Spatial Mind: Okay. Who's personal information did I throw out?

Why would you ask me that? Even if you believe that you do not "dox" or throw out information, you clearly know I already I think you share too much about people without their permission and with the possibility of ill intent.

Dragoonback said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

How tall are you? 

Earlier:
Dragoonback said: 
The point is not whether your own information was exposed voluntarily. The issue is the broader principle around personal information. You criticize doxxing and involving families when it is done to you, but your own descriptions include involving other people's information and relationships during conflicts. If exposing personal information is considered harmful, that standard should apply consistently regardless of who does it or why.

The original situation does not automatically justify every response afterward. The issue is the pattern of how conflicts are framed and handled.

Spatial Mind: Oh really? And who did I dox?
Dragoonback: Didn't say you "dox." I said you throw out other people's personal information. 
Spatial Mind: Okay. Who's personal information did I throw out?

Why would you ask me that?

I'd tell you why after knowing.

Even if you believe that you do not "dox" or throw out information, you clearly know I already I think you share too much about people without their permission and with the possibility of ill intent.

 Any examples ?

Like. I know secrets and I keep things secret when asked to. I do this for Med, there's a member who followed my lead during a bad trade in Alice trading group. I told him not to invest more than he can afford to lose. We lost, he started tripping out from losing $800, I fixed it and I don't discuss who it is cause he never told anyone.

I have multiple nudes that magically ended up in my hands, some of them are from others passing them around. I don't do that, though I will help myself. 

I have your face, you posted it, I don't repost that. 

I understand you'd like to defame me or paint me as untrustworthy. But I'm trustworthy. 

Oh and the big one. 

I know who Legga really is. I know his name, his face, where he works. His work number. I can rate him, I've seen his interviews. I can legit fly over there and take him out for Breakfast lunch of dinner.  

I discovered who he is by piecing together breadcrumbs and bang. I proved it to him by censoring his first and last name, it freaked him out. I told him not to worry we can argue and shit I'll never dox him. 

Which brings me back to the do nothing thing. It occured to me that I was able to do this at the right time, and it ended the cock waving contest he was throwing. Pretty funny. When asked I'd say it's because I was meant to know.  

Spatial Mind said: 

defectivexadem said: 

Tony - narcissistic probably lightly on the spectrum. many hints like understanding relationships transactionally only etc etc unable to form real bonds

I'm a giver not a taker, but what's given to me I'll take. Though there comes a time to pull back.

I'll tell you how SC started calling me a narcissist....

Just like a narcissist to have a long story to justify how they're not a narcissist. 

Dude I just look at you and I'm like 'damn, what a narcissist' without needing the history lesson. There's straight up tells in how a person types, and after enough time watching shit like The Circle, Love Island, and anything 90 Day Fiancé coded I can straight up see how you fit the bill. 

And now's the part where you discredit me ad hominem as to why you shouldn't even question why you resemble other narcissists. 

Turncoat said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

defectivexadem said: 

Tony - narcissistic probably lightly on the spectrum. many hints like understanding relationships transactionally only etc etc unable to form real bonds

I'm a giver not a taker, but what's given to me I'll take. Though there comes a time to pull back.

I'll tell you how SC started calling me a narcissist....

Just like a narcissist to have a long story to justify how they're not a narcissist. 

Dude I just look at you and I'm like 'damn, what a narcissist' without needing the history lesson. There's straight up tells in how a person types, and after enough time watching shit like The Circle, Love Island, and anything 90 Day Fiancé coded I can straight up see how you fit the bill. 

And now's the part where you discredit me ad hominem as to why you shouldn't even question why you resemble other narcissists. 

 3-4 paragraphs isn't a long story, though it is an old one.

Here's how it is...again.

- The only ones in the world that consider me a narcissist, are some SC members. ( Groupthink )

- They never liked how I handled their threats against my family. You don't seem to like it either for shameful reasons

- Ed ( key aggressor ) who is Alia's tool ( Prime aggressor ) Is the one who started calling me a narcissist. 

You were there and you drank the Kool-aid and been on "the bandwagon" ever since. Now you're flinching out at a true story. 

Look at what Xena said.....

"I'm with Spatial / Was he supposed to just lie down and get kicked ?"

A narcissist doesn't operate from a moral high ground, while this ground, is mine to claim. 

Spatial Mind said: 

 3-4 paragraphs isn't a long story, though it is an old one. Here's how it is... again. The only ones in the world that consider me a narcissist, are some SC members. (Groupthink). They never liked how I handled their threats against my family. You don't seem to like it either for shameful reasons. Ed (key aggressor) who is Alia's tool (prime aggressor) is the one who started calling me a narcissist. You were there and you drank the Kool-aid and been on "the bandwagon" ever since. Now you're flinching out at a true story. 

Look at what Xena said "I'm with Spatial / Was he supposed to just lie down and get kicked?" A narcissist doesn't operate from a moral high ground, while this ground, is mine to claim. 

Here's why I think the narcissism criticism is worth taking seriously rather than dismissing it as “groupthink.” When I raised a concern about you retaining or discussing personal information about me, you didn't really address the concern. You asked for more information about me, challenged me to identify exactly whose information you had shared, and then emphasized how much information you possess while assuring me that you're trustworthy. You even framed my concern as an attempt to make you look bad. My boundary became evidence of hostility toward you rather than something you could simply acknowledge. That's the same aggressive, blame-shifting pattern I've been pointing out.

I see it elsewhere too. You repeatedly turn disagreement into questions of status, intelligence, morality, or psychological defects. People who disagree with you become insecure, weak, stupid, manipulated, or even “possessed,” while you position yourself as the perceptive person who can see through everyone else and claim the “moral high ground.” Calling Ed Alia's “tool” and everyone else a “bandwagon” doesn't explain why multiple people might perceive similar traits in you; it just dismisses the people making the criticism.

I'm not diagnosing you, but that's why I think narcissistic traits are a plausible interpretation. It's the recurring combination of superiority, status framing, aggressive reactions to criticism, attribution of hostile motives, and difficulty treating disagreement as simply disagreement. It's also ironic that you call me “prideful” while repeatedly framing yourself as the morally or intellectually superior party.

Dragoonback said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

 3-4 paragraphs isn't a long story, though it is an old one. Here's how it is... again. The only ones in the world that consider me a narcissist, are some SC members. (Groupthink). They never liked how I handled their threats against my family. You don't seem to like it either for shameful reasons. Ed (key aggressor) who is Alia's tool (prime aggressor) is the one who started calling me a narcissist. You were there and you drank the Kool-aid and been on "the bandwagon" ever since. Now you're flinching out at a true story. 

Look at what Xena said "I'm with Spatial / Was he supposed to just lie down and get kicked?" A narcissist doesn't operate from a moral high ground, while this ground, is mine to claim. 

Here's why I think the narcissism criticism is worth taking seriously rather than dismissing it as “groupthink.” When I raised a concern about you retaining or discussing personal information about me, you didn't really address the concern.

Don't have any personal information about you. 

I have your image, you posted that yourself. 

You asked for more information about me, challenged me to identify exactly whose information you had shared, and then emphasized how much information you possess while assuring me that you're trustworthy.You even framed my concern as an attempt to make you look bad. My boundary became evidence of hostility toward you rather than something you could simply acknowledge. That's the same aggressive, blame-shifting pattern I've been pointing out.

Bullshit. At best I asked how tall you were. 

I challenged you to identify who's information I shared. ( You honestly have no answer )

It's not important for me to gain your trust, however, there are many members that have entrusted information with me and I keep it. I used Legga as a prime example. I also safeguard everything Med and I spoke about in private even when she's being cunty toward me. 

I have multiple pictures of pretty much everyone who exposed themselves. Of all members I have the most of Delora from the image of herself she shared with me long ago, to images of her that surfaced, the many screenshots I've taken with her and EBZ getting along on lifestream. Wedding photos. 

I had friendly conversations with Scarlet and images of her. I know a little bit about Feathers, we've spoken. I'll most likely be meeting Xena soon, and no one will ever know whatever personal information she's shared with me. 

I realized who Feral is, but I won't say for her sake. 

Tryptamine, yes. There are things I'm not to repeat. 

Notice how I'm naming names here. Not a single one will come at me for ever, as you say, "sharing information".

 I won't bother replying to the rest of your post, as this reply showcases how you've spiraled off into assumption.

.

.

.

As I've said before, everyone has a degree of narcissism. Something like that.

I claim a light spectrum of narcissism and my way of collecting respect and admiration is through my word and keeping trust. 

Spatial Mind said: 

Don't have any personal information about you. I have your image, you posted that yourself. Bullshit. At best I asked how tall you were. I challenged you to identify who's information I shared. (You honestly have no answer)

It's not important for me to gain your trust, however, there are many members that have entrusted information with me and I keep it. I used Legga as a prime example. I also safeguard everything Med and I spoke about in private even when she's being cunty toward me. I have multiple pictures of pretty much everyone who exposed themselves. Of all members I have the most of Delora from the image of herself she shared with me long ago, to images of her that surfaced, the many screenshots I've taken with her and EBZ getting along on lifestream. Wedding photos. 

I had friendly conversations with Scarlet and images of her. I know a little bit about Feathers, we've spoken. I'll most likely be meeting Xena soon, and no one will ever know whatever personal information she's shared with me. I realized who Feral is, but I won't say for her sake. Tryptamine, yes. There are things I'm not to repeat. 

Notice how I'm naming names here. Not a single one will come at me for ever, as you say, "sharing information". 

As I've said before, everyone has a degree of narcissism. Something like that. I claim a light spectrum of narcissism and my way of collecting respect and admiration is through my word and keeping trust. 

You actually contradict yourself almost immediately. You say, “Don't have any personal information about you,” then immediately say, “I have your image.” An identifiable image is personal information in the ordinary meaning of the term. Instead of clarifying the distinction, you respond with “Bullshit,” which is unnecessarily inflammatory.

Your claim that you don't share people's information also doesn't hold up when you immediately spend the rest of the post listing people's identities, images, relationships, private conversations, and other personal details. You can't establish that every person whose information you possess or discuss consented to you retaining or talking about it.

And I never consented to you saving, discussing, or repeatedly bringing up my personal details. Saying “you posted your image yourself” only explains how you obtained that one image. It doesn't make you trustworthy with the information or prove that I'm falsely portraying you as “untrustworthy.” In fact, your own response gives me more reason to question that trustworthiness. You openly describe keeping extensive information and images about other members, repeatedly bring up personal details about people, and then expect me to simply accept your claim that you safeguard everything. Calling my concern “bullshit” doesn't establish that. It just shifts the accusation back onto me while avoiding the actual issue.

You also regularly bring up information about other members yourself. You repeatedly use Turncoat's real name, bring up my weight without being prompted, discuss your former roommate and the “movie fan” while insulting them, and bring up hanging out with other people in ways that seem intended to mock or diminish me. So when you insist that you're being falsely portrayed as “untrustworthy,” I don't think that follows from the evidence you've presented. Your own behavior gives people reasonable grounds to question how trustworthy you are with personal information.

There's also an inconsistency in your position on narcissism. Earlier, you dismissed the criticism as groupthink and a hostile bandwagon, yet now you openly acknowledge that you have a “light spectrum of narcissism.” You're free to argue that your traits are mild or harmless, but that's different from claiming the observation itself is merely groupthink. From what I've seen, I don't find “light” narcissism particularly convincing, and it appears to interfere with your reasoning. The repeated status framing, superiority, admiration-seeking, aggressive reactions to criticism, and tendency to assign hostile motives to people who disagree with you seem considerably more pronounced than you recognize. You repeatedly position yourself as the person who can see through everyone else while people who disagree are insecure, weak, stupid, manipulated, or part of a bandwagon. I think narcissistic traits are a plausible interpretation of your behavior. And it's ironic that you call me “prideful” while repeatedly positioning yourself as morally or intellectually above the people who disagree with you. Your reactions to criticism are part of why I think the narcissism criticism has substance, not a refutation of it.