Sociopath Community

Dragoonback said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

Dragoonback said: 

The point is not whether your own information was exposed voluntarily. The issue is the broader principle around personal information. You criticize doxxing and involving families when it is done to you, but your own descriptions include involving other people's information and relationships during conflicts. If exposing personal information is considered harmful, that standard should apply consistently regardless of who does it or why.

The original situation does not automatically justify every response afterward. The issue is the pattern of how conflicts are framed and handled.

 Oh really ? And who did I dox ?

 Didn't say you "dox." I said you throw out other people's personal information. 

 Okay. 

Who's personal information did I throw out ?

Are you saying the left out have nothing?

I'm with Spatial. He was treated unfairly.

I was lucky enough to have read most of the story from both points of view before luna torched the old forum.

Whatever else I can say about him, dude can play guitar. I like that.

And yes. He did what he did in retalliation.

Was he supposed to just lie down and get kicked? 

I don't think so. 😋

Spats, my man. I still hate your political leanings. Blah. 😑

But I could hang out in Toronto with you if I ever make it up that way again.

We could go to Fran' s and talk about other things. Music, Star Trek or whichever.

The rest of you ppl will believe almost anything. 😋 

Seeing him On video, I think Spatial is one of the higher functioning individuals here.

Zena said: 

And yes. He did what he did in retalliation.

 Did what exactly? 

Zena said: 

I'm with Spatial. He was treated unfairly.

I was lucky enough to have read most of the story from both points of view before luna torched the old forum.

Whatever else I can say about him, dude can play guitar. I like that.

And yes. He did what he did in retalliation.

Was he supposed to just lie down and get kicked? 

I don't think so. 😋

Right ?

They're coming at me posting images of my siblings, cousins and Nephew. Damn and others. Saying they'll get me. The prime aggressor never liked the way I choked out her brain and had to remove herself from my presence, left the forum, and there's Ed with the high pitch voice "You're a monster !" 

Spats, my man. I still hate your political leanings. Blah. 😑

Carney Trudeau Hillary Biden Harris AOC illegal immigrant liberal-istic liberal libtard feminist !

But I could hang out in Toronto with you if I ever make it up that way again.

I imagine you're somewhere in the westend of the GTA.

We could go to Fran' s and talk about other things. Music, Star Trek or whichever.

Other day Trypt and I were talking about meeting members. I said the only members I can potentially meet are Xena and Feathers since you both offered to meet up at some point. Trypt told me you stabbed someone lol. so yeah.

If that happens here's what we'd do.

We'd talk about SC, like that time Dragoon attempted to arouse your reproductive system into activation by suggesting making a chatbot in your likeness and fondling it's tits with his little hands like in porn when step mommy has sex with step son, so in real life he's had the idea of you while stimulating his wii wii and wasting semen with your name on it. He's a homosexual with bisexual fantasies, but afraid of accidental womb fertilization so he avoids women so he's basically a homosexual

Never heard of Fran's so I checked out the instagram. Food looks rich, everyone looks liberal. One day.

Eat light cause I would then rent a car, probably something cool, so we can do anything the city has to offer. In general the only thing to do is sample food from various places. Go half on scratch tickets and go half on potential winnings. I'd pack some consumables, a gram of this and that just in case we ain't laughing. I quit smoking but you can, though I will smoke occasionally so if you do this bring some for me.

I also think in person you'd have a mashed appearance. Don't know. Doesn't matter we can be comrades looking for something to make fun of. 

The rest of you ppl will believe almost anything. 😋 

Seeing him On video, I think Spatial is one of the higher functioning individuals here.

 I know the video you're talking about cause I only ever uploaded 1 video of me playing. Not a great performance, I only did that cause I just started off with percussion play style. Now I can apply that style to anything and I wouldn't play that song it's very basic. 

If you're talking about the other video where I'm yappin away for 5 minutes. Yes I'm really soft spoken, and physically I'm thinner than I was in both videos. 

Spatial Mind said: 

We'd talk about SC, like that time Dragoon attempted to arouse your reproductive system into activation by suggesting making a chatbot in your likeness and fondling it's tits with his little hands like in porn when step mommy has sex with step son, so in real life he's had the idea of you while stimulating his wii wii and wasting semen with your name on it. 

 My hands are pretty average male size and yes I measured them at one point. I also never made the bot or came to that.

Dragoonback said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

We'd talk about SC, like that time Dragoon attempted to arouse your reproductive system into activation by suggesting making a chatbot in your likeness and fondling it's tits with his little hands like in porn when step mommy has sex with step son, so in real life he's had the idea of you while stimulating his wii wii and wasting semen with your name on it. 

 My hands are pretty average male size and yes I measured them at one point. I also never made the bot or came to that.

 Let me take a page from your book.....

Saying your hands are pretty average sized for a male and claiming you measured them, doesn't prove anything.

Besides, who measures their hands.

Small hands final verdict. 

Spatial Mind said: 

Let me take a page from your book... saying your hands are pretty average sized for a male and claiming you measured them, doesn't prove anything. Besides, who measures their hands? Small hands final verdict. 

In what way is that a page from my book? You're actually demonstrating the problem I'm pointing out. I said I measured my hands, which is evidence for their size, while you're the one making an unsupported assumption that they're small. Saying "it's not proof" or "let me take a page from your book" doesn't address that distinction, it just creates a false analogy.

You've done the same thing before by calling it "talking in loops" when I repeatedly point out gaps in evidence or logical fallacies in your arguments. Repeating the objection isn't the problem when the underlying fallacy or lack of evidence hasn't been addressed. And when you repeatedly ignore those problems while continuing to make the same unsupported or incendiary claims, it reasonably raises further questions about the validity of the claims themselves.

So this isn't an example of my reasoning. It's a distorted caricature of it that you constructed so you could mock it.

You really should take a course in logic and logical fallacies. Even if you are more intelligent, that doesn't make you immune to bad reasoning, nor does it make you inherently better than anyone else. Refinement and education still matter, especially when you repeatedly fall into the same fallacies while accusing others of failing to learn.

Dragoonback said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

Let me take a page from your book... saying your hands are pretty average sized for a male and claiming you measured them, doesn't prove anything. Besides, who measures their hands? Small hands final verdict. 

In what way is that a page from my book? You're actually demonstrating the problem I'm pointing out. I said I measured my hands, which is evidence for their size, while you're the one making an unsupported assumption that they're small. Saying "it's not proof" or "let me take a page from your book" doesn't address that distinction, it just creates a false analogy.

Saying you measured your hands, is not evidence for their size, nor is saying so evidence that you even did it.  

You've done the same thing before by calling it "talking in loops" when I repeatedly point out gaps in evidence or logical fallacies in your arguments.

I called it circular ir loopy. Repeating yourself is such.

Your issue is you don't understand logic beyond your shallow boundaries so what makes sense, doesn't make sense to you. You don't want to understand either. Just want to argue. You want there to be fallacies so bad, you claim them.

Repeating the objection isn't the problem when the underlying fallacy or lack of evidence hasn't been addressed. And when you repeatedly ignore those problems while continuing to make the same unsupported or incendiary claims, it reasonably raises further questions about the validity of the claims themselves.

You repeated that you measured your hands, and claim what you say is evidence. 

lol Measured your hands.

So this isn't an example of my reasoning. It's a distorted caricature of it that you constructed so you could mock it.

Saying this isn't an example of your reasoning, works against you at this point. It certainly is. 

You really should take a course in logic and logical fallacies.

Not a good idea for me that would be a waste of time, though good advice to you.

Do you know where you can find a course of logic and logical fallacies ?

Like damn, a course of logical fallacies. They actually teach that ? Nah. 

Even if you are more intelligent, that doesn't make you immune to bad reasoning, nor does it make you inherently better than anyone else.

Bad reasoning wasn't the case here. 

Refinement and education still matter, especially when you repeatedly fall into the same fallacies while accusing others of failing to learn.

 Are you speaking your mind with the stuff you're contemplating ?

That a boy. 

Spatial Mind said: 

Saying you measured your hands isn't evidence for their size, nor does it prove you actually measured them. I called your arguments circular or loopy because you keep repeating yourself, and you don't understand logic beyond your shallow boundaries, so what makes sense to you doesn't make sense to me. You don't want to understand, you just want to argue, and you want there to be fallacies so badly that you invent them. You keep repeating that you measured your hands and claim what you say is evidence. Saying this isn't an example of your reasoning works against you because it certainly is. I don't need a logic course because it would be a waste of time, though you should take one. Bad reasoning wasn't involved here. And are you actually speaking your mind with all this stuff you're contemplating?

You're conflating evidence with proof. I never said that measuring my hands makes my claim infallible. I said it gives the claim an evidentiary basis, whereas your initial "small hands final verdict" was an unsupported assertion. You can question whether my measurement was accurate, but that still doesn't make your unsupported conclusion equivalent to a claim backed by a stated measurement. That's why your analogy fails. This is also the distortion I'm pointing out. You changed my claim from "I have evidence" into "my statement is proof," then attacked the version you invented. That's a strawman.

As for "loopy," repeating an objection is not circular reasoning simply because it is repeated. If the underlying objection remains unanswered, repeating it does not make it disappear. If you think I'm committing a fallacy, identify the specific fallacy and explain why. Saying I don't understand logic or that I merely want there to be fallacies is just dismissing the objection instead of addressing it.

And the logic course part is just another distortion. I was telling you that you should take one because of the repeated problems in your reasoning. You then pretended that I was contemplating taking one myself and responded with "that a boy" as though I had conceded that I needed it. That's not a rebuttal to what I said, it's just a condescending reversal of the argument. So no, this isn't a page from my book. You made an unsupported claim, I pointed out the lack of evidence, and you manufactured a false equivalence by pretending my stated evidence is the same thing as your original unsupported assertion.