Sociopath Community

Maninist said: 

Elon says he lost his oldest Son to transgenderism. They don't get along from the looks of it. Guy looks like Elon with a wig.

If Neurolink can remove disorders it can probably be abused in evasive ways. When Elon dies his technology could end up being governed by a mad person seeking to alter minds to suit what Elon calls "The Woke Mind Virus".

Saying Elon “lost his child to transgenderism” does not make sense. His child was not killed or taken away by a disease. They became estranged, and describing that as being “lost” already assumes that the transgender identity caused the relationship to fail. It ignores the possibility that Elon’s own response contributed to the estrangement.

The brain-chip speculation makes even less sense. Neuralink is not a device that can erase whichever traits, identities, or beliefs someone dislikes. There is no evidence that it can remove homosexuality, transgender identity, political beliefs, or a person’s identity generally. Homosexuality and being transgender are also not disorders. Both of you are inventing capabilities for Neuralink based entirely on traits you personally disapprove of.

His eldest Son is a transexual. Elon doesn't believe in Transexual ideology nor will he call his Son a she. In turn they don't see eye to eye.

He lost his Son. 

Guess I need to write a masterclass on how people don't need to die to loose them and Dragoon.  Yo momma.

Spatial Mind said: 

His eldest Son is a transexual. Elon doesn't believe in Transexual ideology nor will he call his Son a she. In turn they don't see eye to eye.

He lost his Son. 

Guess I need to write a masterclass on how people don't need to die to loose them and Dragoon.  Yo momma.

I understand that “lost” can mean estrangement rather than death. That was not the issue. The phrase “lost his son to transgenderism” assigns the cause of the estrangement to the child’s identity, as though transgender identity took the child away from him. They became estranged because they rejected each other’s views and relationship terms. Elon refusing to recognize his child’s identity is part of that conflict. Calling it a loss “to transgenderism” removes his role and turns the child into a casualty of an ideology.

So no masterclass is needed. You are answering a distinction I did not dispute while avoiding the causal assumption I actually criticized.

Dragoonback said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

His eldest Son is a transexual. Elon doesn't believe in Transexual ideology nor will he call his Son a she. In turn they don't see eye to eye.

He lost his Son. 

Guess I need to write a masterclass on how people don't need to die to loose them and Dragoon.  Yo momma.

I understand that “lost” can mean estrangement rather than death. That was not the issue. The phrase “lost his son to transgenderism” assigns the cause of the estrangement to the child’s identity, as though transgender identity took the child away from him. They became estranged because they rejected each other’s views and relationship terms. Elon refusing to recognize his child’s identity is part of that conflict. Calling it a loss “to transgenderism” removes his role and turns the child into a casualty of an ideology.

So no masterclass is needed. You are answering a distinction I did not dispute while avoiding the causal assumption I actually criticized.

 Pasting Ai quite a lot lately. Keep it up, it's less retarded than the real you. Now you've evolved from retarded to annoying.

( Just joking. Ai in the hands of a moron doesn't help  I've learned they'll ask it to argue anything. )

I said "Elon said he lost his eldest Son"

This is correct. You can spiral out into whatever direction but I'm not wrong, and your criticism doesn't matter.

I also agree with Elon. 

Been 6 years now.

Started in 2020 when Elon told Xavier to stop wearing a COVID-19 mask like a sheeple. That and they have different views.

.

.

.

Elon is right about the mask. Nothing about COVID19 changed, and a bloody mask can't stop a virus when it can't even stop smoke. If anything wearing a mask would help a respiratory illness kill someone. 

Spatial Mind said: 

Pasting Ai quite a lot lately. Keep it up, it's less retarded than the real you. Now you've evolved from retarded to annoying. (Just joking. Ai in the hands of a moron doesn't help. I've learned they'll ask it to argue anything. )

I said "Elon said he lost his eldest Son" This is correct. You can spiral out into whatever direction but I'm not wrong, and your criticism doesn't matter.

I also agree with Elon. Been 6 years now. Started in 2020 when Elon told Xavier to stop wearing a COVID-19 mask like a sheeple. That and they have different views.

Elon is right about the mask. Nothing about COVID19 changed, and a bloody mask can't stop a virus when it can't even stop smoke. If anything wearing a mask would help a respiratory illness kill someone. 

You changed the claim. I never disputed that Elon said he “lost” his child through estrangement. I disputed saying he lost them “to transgenderism,” which assigns the cause entirely to the child’s identity and ignores Elon’s role in the conflict.

The mask comparison is also wrong. COVID spreads through respiratory droplets and aerosols, while smoke contains different particles and gases. Masks do not need to block everything to reduce exposure, and N95s are far more effective than loose cloth or surgical masks. Saying my criticism “doesn’t matter” is not a rebuttal. It is just refusing to address it.