Sociopath Community

Maninist said: 

Elon says he lost his oldest Son to transgenderism. They don't get along from the looks of it. Guy looks like Elon with a wig.

If Neurolink can remove disorders it can probably be abused in evasive ways. When Elon dies his technology could end up being governed by a mad person seeking to alter minds to suit what Elon calls "The Woke Mind Virus".

Saying Elon “lost his child to transgenderism” does not make sense. His child was not killed or taken away by a disease. They became estranged, and describing that as being “lost” already assumes that the transgender identity caused the relationship to fail. It ignores the possibility that Elon’s own response contributed to the estrangement.

The brain-chip speculation makes even less sense. Neuralink is not a device that can erase whichever traits, identities, or beliefs someone dislikes. There is no evidence that it can remove homosexuality, transgender identity, political beliefs, or a person’s identity generally. Homosexuality and being transgender are also not disorders. Both of you are inventing capabilities for Neuralink based entirely on traits you personally disapprove of.

His eldest Son is a transexual. Elon doesn't believe in Transexual ideology nor will he call his Son a she. In turn they don't see eye to eye.

He lost his Son. 

Guess I need to write a masterclass on how people don't need to die to loose them and Dragoon.  Yo momma.

Spatial Mind said: 

His eldest Son is a transexual. Elon doesn't believe in Transexual ideology nor will he call his Son a she. In turn they don't see eye to eye.

He lost his Son. 

Guess I need to write a masterclass on how people don't need to die to loose them and Dragoon.  Yo momma.

I understand that “lost” can mean estrangement rather than death. That was not the issue. The phrase “lost his son to transgenderism” assigns the cause of the estrangement to the child’s identity, as though transgender identity took the child away from him. They became estranged because they rejected each other’s views and relationship terms. Elon refusing to recognize his child’s identity is part of that conflict. Calling it a loss “to transgenderism” removes his role and turns the child into a casualty of an ideology.

So no masterclass is needed. You are answering a distinction I did not dispute while avoiding the causal assumption I actually criticized.

Dragoonback said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

His eldest Son is a transexual. Elon doesn't believe in Transexual ideology nor will he call his Son a she. In turn they don't see eye to eye.

He lost his Son. 

Guess I need to write a masterclass on how people don't need to die to loose them and Dragoon.  Yo momma.

I understand that “lost” can mean estrangement rather than death. That was not the issue. The phrase “lost his son to transgenderism” assigns the cause of the estrangement to the child’s identity, as though transgender identity took the child away from him. They became estranged because they rejected each other’s views and relationship terms. Elon refusing to recognize his child’s identity is part of that conflict. Calling it a loss “to transgenderism” removes his role and turns the child into a casualty of an ideology.

So no masterclass is needed. You are answering a distinction I did not dispute while avoiding the causal assumption I actually criticized.

 Pasting Ai quite a lot lately. Keep it up, it's less retarded than the real you. Now you've evolved from retarded to annoying.

( Just joking. Ai in the hands of a moron doesn't help  I've learned they'll ask it to argue anything. )

I said "Elon said he lost his eldest Son"

This is correct. You can spiral out into whatever direction but I'm not wrong, and your criticism doesn't matter.

I also agree with Elon. 

Been 6 years now.

Started in 2020 when Elon told Xavier to stop wearing a COVID-19 mask like a sheeple. That and they have different views.

.

.

.

Elon is right about the mask. Nothing about COVID19 changed, and a bloody mask can't stop a virus when it can't even stop smoke. If anything wearing a mask would help a respiratory illness kill someone. 

Spatial Mind said: 

Pasting Ai quite a lot lately. Keep it up, it's less retarded than the real you. Now you've evolved from retarded to annoying. (Just joking. Ai in the hands of a moron doesn't help. I've learned they'll ask it to argue anything. )

I said "Elon said he lost his eldest Son" This is correct. You can spiral out into whatever direction but I'm not wrong, and your criticism doesn't matter.

I also agree with Elon. Been 6 years now. Started in 2020 when Elon told Xavier to stop wearing a COVID-19 mask like a sheeple. That and they have different views.

Elon is right about the mask. Nothing about COVID19 changed, and a bloody mask can't stop a virus when it can't even stop smoke. If anything wearing a mask would help a respiratory illness kill someone. 

You changed the claim. I never disputed that Elon said he “lost” his child through estrangement. I disputed saying he lost them “to transgenderism,” which assigns the cause entirely to the child’s identity and ignores Elon’s role in the conflict.

The mask comparison is also wrong. COVID spreads through respiratory droplets and aerosols, while smoke contains different particles and gases. Masks do not need to block everything to reduce exposure, and N95s are far more effective than loose cloth or surgical masks. Saying my criticism “doesn’t matter” is not a rebuttal. It is just refusing to address it.

Off topic, but I have a question to anyone who ever recieved sperm in their anus, though I doubt anyone here really has.

Isn't there a sense that there's something wrong, and there's no reason, point or purpose for the sperm left behind after the climatic event ?

Probably.

Spatial Mind said: 

Off topic, but I have a question to anyone who ever recieved sperm in their anus, though I doubt anyone here really has. Isn't there a sense that there's something wrong, and there's no reason, point or purpose for the sperm left behind after the climatic event? Probably.

You are projecting your own sense of disgust or purposelessness onto other people and then calling it “probably” universal. Something does not become wrong merely because it no longer serves reproduction after orgasm. Plenty of bodily fluids and processes have no continuing purpose once released. At most, someone might find the sensation unpleasant or inconvenient. That is a personal reaction, not evidence that there is objectively something wrong with it.

Dragoonback said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

Pasting Ai quite a lot lately. Keep it up, it's less retarded than the real you. Now you've evolved from retarded to annoying. (Just joking. Ai in the hands of a moron doesn't help. I've learned they'll ask it to argue anything. )

I said "Elon said he lost his eldest Son" This is correct. You can spiral out into whatever direction but I'm not wrong, and your criticism doesn't matter.

I also agree with Elon. Been 6 years now. Started in 2020 when Elon told Xavier to stop wearing a COVID-19 mask like a sheeple. That and they have different views.

Elon is right about the mask. Nothing about COVID19 changed, and a bloody mask can't stop a virus when it can't even stop smoke. If anything wearing a mask would help a respiratory illness kill someone. 

You changed the claim. I never disputed that Elon said he “lost” his child through estrangement. I disputed saying he lost them “to transgenderism,” which assigns the cause entirely to the child’s identity and ignores Elon’s role in the conflict.

I did say and I quote:

"Elon doesn't believe in Transexual ideology nor will he call his Son a she. In turn they don't see eye to eye."

Yes he lost his child to gender dysphoria. Of course it's poitical estrangement. Estrangement is loss.

To the core those Elon products can only be based on what's true. The kid could be gay or bisexual, that's real. He can be a cross dresser, fine. To insist the world plays alone is dysfunctional. Doesn't work well unless one surrounds themselves with the pretentious.

Before this everything was fine between them.

The mask comparison is also wrong. COVID spreads through respiratory droplets and aerosols, while smoke contains different particles and gases. Masks do not need to block everything to reduce exposure, and N95s are far more effective than loose cloth or surgical masks. Saying my criticism “doesn’t matter” is not a rebuttal. It is just refusing to address it.

 Masks doesn't do shit but lowers the chance of infecting others, and won't prevent intake, and let's be honest. The masses used disposable surgical masks, not N95's.

I used an N95 at first, it sucks. Way too much drag for prolonged use. I used a mask so I can enter spaces and avoid public altercations.

Canada's lockdown lasted 2 years. Businesses went down, millions of jobs lost. It was a waste. Lockdown ended, the virus supposedly still exists, and no one wears a mask.

Sweden, Japan and somewhere else never had lockdowns. Articles criticizing them were certainly written by someone who isn't wearing a mask now.

.

On a side note. When I look back I'm glad I never took any of those vaccines. Biden also pardoned Dr. Fouci. 

Dragoonback said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

Off topic, but I have a question to anyone who ever recieved sperm in their anus, though I doubt anyone here really has. Isn't there a sense that there's something wrong, and there's no reason, point or purpose for the sperm left behind after the climatic event? Probably.

You are projecting your own sense of disgust or purposelessness onto other people and then calling it “probably” universal.

I don't have a sense of purposelessness.

Something does not become wrong merely because it no longer serves reproduction after orgasm.

Sperm has a purpose.

Plenty of bodily fluids and processes have no continuing purpose once released.

No. Water recycles itself on this planet.

At most, someone might find the sensation unpleasant or inconvenient. That is a personal reaction, not evidence that there is objectively something wrong with it.

 My question is for anyone who recieved a penile injection in their anus. This question only applies to straight women and homosexual men, and questions their outlook on being left with the cream filling after climax.

Spatial Mind said:

I do not have a sense of purposelessness. Sperm has a purpose, and I disagree that bodily fluids have no continuing purpose once released because water recycles itself on this planet. My question is specifically for anyone who has received a penile injection in their anus, meaning straight women and homosexual men, and asks about their outlook on being left with the “cream filling” after climax.

You are still treating your own assumption as though it describes the recipient’s experience. Saying you personally lack a sense of purposelessness does not answer why you assumed they would feel that “something is wrong.” Yes, sperm has a reproductive function. That does not mean every ejaculation fulfills that function, nor that semen deposited elsewhere becomes objectively wrong or meaningless. A biological capacity is not a requirement.

The water comparison is also irrelevant. Water participating in a planetary cycle does not prove that every released bodily fluid has an immediate purpose for the person involved. Semen is also eventually broken down, expelled, or absorbed, so “recycling” would not establish your conclusion anyway. Restating that the question applies to straight women and gay men does not resolve the problem. You are still asking whether they share a negative interpretation you introduced, then answering “probably” without hearing from them. They may find it unpleasant, neutral, enjoyable, or simply inconvenient. None of those reactions is universal.