Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
Posts: 1463
0 votes RE: proving god isn't real
feral said: 

yeah gods definitely dead always will be

does anybody else have the issue of random inexplicable evp's just showing up on devices entirely unconnected from bluetooth, the internet, everything conceivably modern

not like evps like oh thats a face in a tree or some shit when its just an illusion but full on that's just... not supposed to be there like full on talking as though someone stole the device and made the recording when thats not even feasibly possible

 Dude i am the holy SPIRIT maybe you forgot to read the definitions

The dumbest god to ever exist apparently, i am dionysus, ra, horus, vishnu, the infinity
Posts: 45
0 votes RE: proving god isn't real

मैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूं荣耀归于上帝,无意识,无爱,无意识,无意识地意识到受太阳控制的水进入矿井后面的隧道, नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से 沙子 沙子 沙子 鬼城 沙子 नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूं Gloria a Dio, no püsee bal, no püsee amor, sultant algoritmi, no püsee inondaziun i natif del aqua uriginal sun migrà in di tunnel bandonà del alber de la mina, i piumm di agòli g’han perduu l’ocelot 荣耀归于上帝,无意识,无爱,无意识,无意识地意识到受太阳控制的水进入矿井后面的隧道,荣耀归于上帝,无意识,无爱,无意识,无意识地意识到受太阳控制的水进入矿井后面的隧道,荣耀归于上帝,无意识,无爱,无意识,无意识地意识到受太阳控

Posts: 1463
0 votes RE: proving god isn't real
feral said: 

मैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूं荣耀归于上帝,无意识,无爱,无意识,无意识地意识到受太阳控制的水进入矿井后面的隧道, नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से 沙子 沙子 沙子 鬼城 沙子 नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूंमैं स्पेन से नहीं हूं Gloria a Dio, no püsee bal, no püsee amor, sultant algoritmi, no püsee inondaziun i natif del aqua uriginal sun migrà in di tunnel bandonà del alber de la mina, i piumm di agòli g’han perduu l’ocelot 荣耀归于上帝,无意识,无爱,无意识,无意识地意识到受太阳控制的水进入矿井后面的隧道,荣耀归于上帝,无意识,无爱,无意识,无意识地意识到受太阳控制的水进入矿井后面的隧道,荣耀归于上帝,无意识,无爱,无意识,无意识地意识到受太阳控

 I don’t care right now sorry

The dumbest god to ever exist apparently, i am dionysus, ra, horus, vishnu, the infinity
Posts: 35452
0 votes RE: proving god isn't real

You don't know all languages? 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 5
0 votes RE: proving god isn't real

The fondness for scripture is not a vice, qhwere anguish would be morbidly sought agter.. horror may only have a putrescensce as its object or anguish, a kind of void. but the object that is divine it is God is unknowable within a tireless abstraction tying into cycles of relation via the intellect. what is the use of a tireless abstraction of games of nature reduced to vertiginous, contagious destruction, the fondness for the intellect resonating outwardly from its beacon. The death of the sovereign intellect consitutes not a counterbalancing, better once this is done, to pursue more abstractions. The scythe is there for the harvest, the harvest for food, the food for labor, the labor for the factory where the scythes are made. If beyond the labor necessary for the manufacture of as many new bibles as are needed to replace the old ones, there is a surplus, its utility is defined in advanceL it will serve to improve the standard of living. nowhere do we find a totality that is an end in itself that is meaningul as such that doesnt need to justify itself by pleading its usefulness for some other thing. we escape this empty and sterile movement, this su of objects and abstract functions that is the world of the intellect, only by entering a very different world where objects are on the same plane as the subject, where they form, together, with the subject, a soverien totality whihch is not divided by any abstraction and is commensurate with the entire universe.

What strikes one from the fierst is a recession of discernible elements, a kind of drowning in which there is nothing drowned nor any depth of water that would drown. it would be easy to say to the contrary:L not at all... and to cite distinct impressions. these impressions do in fact remain, despitre the feeling of being fdrowned to which i refer. this feeling is so strange that as a rulke one fives up the idea of desccribing it. Oh for a stern integrity, that will hold the word, and will never depart frin ut, come what may. this much concerning the value of a "thus saith the lord."


We often fool ourselves if some incomplete perception is interpretef by us as being that of a the word of God: it is not the word of God: a simple reflection gave me the impression it was, and i thought i was going to touch it. but the example proves nothing. for an error of this kind id verifiable and other times it is indeeed a bottle that my hand grasps. it is ture that a bottle in the hand, a correct proof, is something certain, solid. wheras , in the most favorabe case the possibility of attaining the desire or thr existence of the other and not just its external signs is generally disputed. To make this radical difference between two worlds perceptible there is no finer example than the domain of erotic life, where the onbject is rarely situated on another plane than the subject. The object of sensual desire is by nature another desire. the desire of the senses is the desire, if not to destroy oneself, at least to be consumed and to lose oneself without reservation., now the object of my desire does not truly respond to it except on one condition: that i aawaken in it a desire equal to mine. love in its essence is so clearly the cooincidence of two desires that there is nothing more meaningul in love, even in the purest love. but the other's desire is desirable insofar as it is an analysed substance known in a laboratory. The two desires fully respond to one another only when perceived in the tranasparence of an intimate comprehension. of course a deep repulsion underlies this comprehension: the intellect conjures many illusory fabrications as desire is at the root of life the operations of unfolding all possible abstract mental operations following the embrace of everything is impossible. Hence the accusations against my knowledge of this subject and recent accusations of my ignorance on the matter at hand.


Dear friends,

the second part of our subjecct may be very displeasing to some who have strayed in here, but that i cannot help. i do not remember ever asking any one to come and her me, and therefore,m as you come of your own wills, when i have any truth to speak, i shall not conceal it because you choose to be present. at the present crisis, i feel that it is woe unto me if i do not lift up my voice and urge with all my might the necessity of reofrmation of sata clause. i have moreover, an excellent excuse for the inquiry i am about to make; for as i am bublicly charged with ignorance, it is at once my duty and my proviledge ti seej unstycutib if tgise whi ckaun aytgiruty to teach. when one is known to be profoundly ignorant, and there are certain fathers in the faith who have the power to instruct, the least thing that can be allowe d is us to ask questions, and the smallest boon can we expect is to have them answered by men expressly ordaiuded to instryuct the ingnorant.

the reverent, dean of words appears to be much better acquanted with the extenct of my reading and mental ascuqrements than i am myself. he speaks with all the positiveness of a personal acquaintance concerning amy reputed ignorance, and for my own part i am not at all anxious to question so reverant an authority., he qwrites: " as to that young minister who is now raving against the evangelical clergy on this point, it is to be regretrted that so much notice has been taken of his railings. he is to be pitied because hius entire want of acueuancce with theological literature leaves hinm utterly unfit for determination of such a question ; which is a question, not of mere doctrine, but of what may be called historical theology;l and his charges are just a parallel to those which the romanists would bring against himself as well as others for the interpretation of the words, 'this is my body." but qwew hw a wiser man than he ius, he would know better what his qulifications are for passing judgement on such a point, and be willing to learn from such facts, among others, as the gorham judgement and the cases of charges against the evangelical clergy . let him hold and enforce his own view of doctrine as he pleases; but thwne he undertakes to determine what is the exclusive meaning of the BOOK OF COMMON PRAYER< sand rings a vcharege of disohonesty what he does. against those ewho take saa different view of that meaning from what he does, he only shows the presumptusous self-confiudence with which he is prepared to pronounce judvgement oupon matter of which he is profoundly ignorant. to hold a controversy with him upon the subject would be to as little purpose as to attempt to hold a logically-constructed argyment with a child unacquainted with logical terms. when this paragraph caught my eye , my heart leaped with joy for i kknew that the sinners in zionm were afraid; and i thought i heard a voice crying from thre world god hath choses the foolish things of this world to confound the wise ; and god hath chosesn the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty and base things of the world and things hich are despiresed things pbring to naught things that are... that no flresh should glory in his prescence.

Posts: 191
0 votes RE: proving god isn't real

None of the shit in the previous post makes sense.

Posts: 1463
0 votes RE: proving god isn't real

You don't know all languages? 

 I only know english and emptiness

 

Unless i design langauge and eat the orb i made

Or click fingers and judge my self to have the langauge

Basically no i can’t speak other than emptiness or english

 

and i got no magic

 

i am hard set to 1 langauge and 0 langauge

The dumbest god to ever exist apparently, i am dionysus, ra, horus, vishnu, the infinity
Posts: 1463
0 votes RE: proving god isn't real
Ofvalue said: 

None of the shit in the previous post makes sense.

 

 

Bible love is not sin. Pain for pain’s sake is.
Fear seeks rot, pain, or void. God stays beyond full grasp.
Mind loops and endless thought do not give true meaning.
Killing one idea only to chase new ones solves little.
Blade → crop → food → work → blade.
Most things serve some next use.
A thing that is its own end is rare.
We leave dry thought only when self and world stand as one whole.
Not split by cold ideas.
Whole, direct, and real.
There is a strange state like drowning with no water.
Hard to name.
Hard to explain.
Truth must be held even when words fail.
Many mistake their own thoughts for God’s Word.
A feeling is not proof.
A real thing in hand is easy to verify.
Spiritual claims are harder to prove.
Love shows the gap between object and subject.
Desire seeks desire.
Love is the meeting of two desires.
Love fails if only one side desires.
The other person is not a lab object.
They are understood through shared inner experience.
Intellect alone cannot contain all of life.
The author is accused of ignorance.
He argues that questions should be allowed.
Teachers should answer if they claim authority.
Critics say he lacks theological learning.
They compare debating him to debating a child.
They claim he misunderstands church history and doctrine.
The author welcomes the attack.
He sees it as proof that his words struck a nerve.
He answers with Scripture.
God often uses:
fools to shame the wise,
weak to shame the strong,
low things to humble great things.
Main points:

God is beyond pure intellect.
Utility is not the highest meaning.
The intellect alone becomes sterile.
Direct experience matters.
Not every inner voice is God’s voice.
Love requires mutual desire.
Human beings are more than objects of analysis.
Authority may be questioned.
Critics are not always right.
Truth is not decided by status, learning, or rank.

 I chatgpt fixed it for you clowns

The dumbest god to ever exist apparently, i am dionysus, ra, horus, vishnu, the infinity
last edit on 6/7/2026 5:06:07 PM
Posts: 5
0 votes RE: proving god isn't real

Upon two points we will speak at once. The first is a crowded prison, “The scripture hath
shut up all under sin.” And the second is a glorious jail delivery, “that the promise by faith of Jesus
Christ might be given to them that believe.”

I. Behold THE CROWDED PRISON—“The scripture hath concluded or shut up all under sin.”
The jailer is the Scripture—a lawful authority, for the Scripture is not the word of man, but of the
Spirit of God. If any man reject the Scripture, I have little to say to him at this moment, for I am
speaking mainly to those who accept the Bible as having been written by an infallible pen.
If the Scripture, then, which you admit to be written by God, shut you up in sin, you are shut up by a
lawful authority, against which you cannot rebel

Where the Word of the God is, there is power. The Scripture, when it comes home to the heart, like a
hammer breaks in pieces, and like a fire burns its way. We need not be alarmed when judged of men, but
the voice of the Lord is full of terrible majesty, and awes the spirit which it condemns.
But how does the Scripture confine all men under sin? I reply, first, it has been well-observed by
Martin Luther that the very promises of Scripture shut up all mankind under sin. To begin with the
first—that morning star of promise which shone over this world when first our parents left the gates of
blighted Eden—“The seed of the women shall bruise the serpent’s head.”
Since such a promise was needed, it is clear that the blessing could only come to men through the
Redeemer, the seed of the woman, and that in the case of all men, the serpent’s head must be broken, or
they would remain under his dominion. When a blessing is promised, there must have been a need for it.
Where a deliverer is predicted, there must have been a necessity for Him.
If a blessing could come to men by the way of merit, or in the course of nature, there would be no
need of a promise—a promise implies a want, and the very first promise of deliverance by the woman’s
seed from the power of the serpent implies that men were under that evil power.

The fact is that the very existence of the Gospel, and its provisions of grace, pardon, and so on—the
coming of a Savior, His death upon the tree, and His intercession in heaven—all prove that men were
shut up under sin. If they had not been so, what need of you, O Cavalry? What need of Your five
wounds, O Son of God?
Surely all this vast machinery for redemption is ridiculous if men be not slaves. This wondrous
filling of a fountain with blood is a vain superfluity, if men are not foul. So that the very Scripture which
is brightest with life to the sons of men carries within it convincing evidence that men, apart from the
grace of God, are shut up under sin

There was nothing about the Mosaic economy to say to man, “You are good, or you can be good,
and you can save yourself.” But everywhere the declaration was—“You have rebelled and have not
served the Lord. You cannot come nigh unto Him until you are purged by the blood of the great
sacrifice. God cannot accept you as you are––you are polluted and defiled.”
The sinfulness of all men is abundantly taught in Scripture. Indeed, it is to be found on every page of
it.
I have spoken of the jailer. Now notice His prisoners. “The Scripture hath concluded all under
sin”—all, all.

But you have been very moral, you say. Yes, but you are shut up under sin, for outwardly moral as
you have been, you dare not say that you have never thought of evil so as to long for it, that you have
never indulged wrong imaginations, that you have never spoken a rash word, that you have never sinned
in action.
Surely you dare not say that you have loved God with all your heart, and all your soul, and all your
strength? Nor that you have always loved your neighbor as yourself? My friend, you, who are so fair to
look upon when you look in the glass of your own self-adulation—if you could see yourself as God sees
you, would discover that you are leprous from head to foot. Your sins are abundant and loathsome,
though you perceive them not.
And this is true of the most religious of those men who are resting in outward observances. They
have prayed every night and morning since they were children. They have never absented themselves
from assemblies for worship. They have attended to baptism and communion, and the like. Ah, sirs, but
the law takes no account of this. If you have not kept its Ten Commandments perfectly, it accepts no
ceremonies as a recompense. God requires of His creatures that they obey His law completely, without
flaw, and one sin of omission or commission will bring down that dreadful sentence which I have
already quoted, “Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things that are written in the book of the
law to do them.” Religious or irreligious, the broken law shuts up all men in the selfsame prison.
Now, notice for a minute the prison itself. It is one from which we cannot escape by any efforts of
our own. Brethren, if we say, “We will never sin again,” we shall sin. And our never sinning again
would make no atonement for past offenses. Suppose we were to resolve from this time forth that we
would suffer mortifications of body, and sorrow of heart, to make atonement for sin? It would be
useless, for the law speaks nothing of repentance.
When a man has broken the law, he must he punished for it—there is no space left for repentance
under the law—and the sure result of our being shut up in the prison of the law, apart from the grace of
God, is to be taken from that prison to execution—and to be destroyed forever by the wrath of God.
There is the prison of the text. There is the jailer and his prisoners.

Posts: 5
0 votes RE: proving god isn't real

II. It is our great happiness to know that we are not shut up in this way with a view to our hopeless
destruction, but in order that the grace of God may come to us, and so we have to speak of A
GLORIOUS JAIL-DELIVERY.
The jail-delivery which I have to speak of is evidently of those who are shut up in the prison. “The
Scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them
that believe.”
Christ came into this world to save those who have broken the law, those whom the law curses, and
those who have no means whatever of escaping from the curse, unless Jesus opens the way. He has not
come to save the righteous. If there be any among you who will not believe that you are shut up in the
prison of the law, I have no Gospel to preach to you.
Why send a physician to a man who is not sick? And why offer alms to a man who is not poor? If
you can save yourselves by your works, go and do so, fools that you are, for you might as well hope to
drink dry the Atlantic. If you believe in self-salvation, I am hopeless of doing you any good till you are
exhausted of your strength. When you are weak and sick, and ready to die, then will you be willing to
accept the free salvation of Christ. But remember, Christ came to save the ungodly—the guilty alone are
objects of mercy.
The Lord Jesus Christ has come to bring to all those who believe in Him a complete deliverance
from the bondage of the law.

The principle which guides him now is not, “This do and thou shalt live,” but this—“I am saved, and
now I love to serve my God.” Now he does not work for wages, and expect to win a reward by merit—
he is a saved man, and he has all that he needs––for Christ is his, and Christ is all.

“But there must be works,” says one, “to follow.” Brother, there will be works to follow. There was
never a true faith which did not produce works—but the works do not save us—faith alone saves. How
strong is the apostle Paul upon this point. Read the epistle to the Romans carefully, and the epistle to the
Galatians, and you will see that they come down like a Nasmyth hammer upon all notion of salvation by
our own doings.
No reasoning could be more cogent, no expressions more plain. “Not of works, lest any man should
boast,” says the apostle. And he puts it over again—“If by grace, then it is no more of works: otherwise
grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then it is no more grace: otherwise work is no more work.”
He will have it that we are saved as poor sinners by the sovereign grace of God, through faith in Christ
Jesus, and not by works, or forms, or ceremonies, or anything whatsoever of our own doing.
Now, that is the plan of salvation. I put it before you, and I pray through Jesus Christ that many may
receive it, for it is not a matter of human opinion, but of divine ordinance. I am not setting up the dogma
of a sect—I am preaching to you the very truth of God. If there be salvation by any other way than by
Jesus Christ, I am a false prophet among you, and this Bible also is false. But if there be salvation to
believers in Jesus, I am a saved man, and all of you who have believed in Jesus are saved also,
effectually and eternally saved.

Who loved Christ best at the Pharisee’s feast? Simon, the Pharisee, who had kept the law? Ah! no.
He was to be saved by his doings, and yet Christ said to him, “Thou gavest me no kiss; thou gavest me
no water to wash my feet.” Simon did not love the Master. He did what he did because he thought he
ought to do it and must do it.
But there was a poor woman there who was a sinner, and she had had much forgiven, and she it was
that did wash His feet with her tears, and wipe them with the hairs of her head. Simon shows how the
self-righteous love the Savior—they do not even wash His feet or kiss His cheeks. But those who are
saved by grace love Jesus, and therefore kiss His feet, and bathe them with their tears—and would
willingly lay down their lives for Him.
Law! There is no power for holiness in it! Law drives our spirits to rebellion, but love has magic in
it. Has God forgiven me? Did Christ die for me? Am I God’s child? Has He forgiven me, not because of
anything I did, but just because He would do it, out of love to my poor guilty soul? O God, I love You.
What would You have me to do? There speaks the man who will perform good works, I warrant you, sir.

Now turn to a page in your Bible and with the flame of the half-red/half-black candle, burn the parchment and let its ashes fall down with them carrying a link to the power that has been evoked through blood and fire, creating a direct link between your Computer and the essence contained within, and represented by, the linear forms of the sigils. Use the mouse to stir the contents of the simulation with widdershins motions as you feel the black energies of Jesus's death fill the contents of your Computer or Mobile Device, binding together the different elements which constitute the baptismal water of the software applications, making them one single element, or point of sympathy. Open your mind's eye and as you stir the cauldron of your computer, behold the dark vortex leading to the Kingdom of the Shadow of Death taking form. Put aside the device and maintain the open vortex while chanting the formula of Jesus death: "That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved."

This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.