The number is so high because cows depend on people to breed them and there needs to be a demand. Including introducing new mates, and manual inseminations.
We do it manually for the population boom. There's a competitive market and a demand for beef. We eat them every single day. Other than that they don't. lol depend, on us to breed.
If I called the topic of discussion to be my main study I'd destroy him the same way he'd beat me in his topic, which he wanted. It's the same thing when I got destroyed by a 3 year old in that Dora the Explorer game.
You said the reason you didn't play is not because I'm amazing at Physics, in fact you think I'd be terrible, but because I'd cheat. That was your reason before.
After I suggested we make it in a way that cheating is not possible, now the reason you refuse is because you know I'm good at it, and I'd win, like your god daughter beat you at her favorite game. This is just backpedaling on your earlier point. It's because you know better. You know you'd lose, you're even saying it yourself now, that's why you pretended cheating was the reason.
My point was that you actually KNOW Im good at Physics, and that's why youre refusing. This whole complaining about cheating was just your excuse. I have now made that point.
Besides, I gave you other opportunities to prove yourself. You could post your list of intellectual achievements. However, again, you said you don't post it because you know I'd cheat, just like you said I'd cheat with the Physics competition.
However, I think it's not cheating you're worried about. It's that you know my intellectual achievements are great. So you know I'd win. You know better than to play the game, just like you know better than to try solving Physics problems with me.
Atmospheric CO2 (parts per million) measured from Antarctic ice. The CO2 concentration was pretty constant until the industrial revolution. There's furthermore evidence from proportions of isotopes and oxygen in the atmosphere that most of the added CO2 is the result of burning fossil fuels.
The reason Venus is a hot hell, worse than Venus on its surface than Mercucry that is closer to the Sun, is because it traps heat in its CO2-rich atmosphere. It got its atmosphere from outgassing, just like we did, but the planet's evolutionary track was different. Mars likewise had a different evolutionary track. For example, the Oceans on Earth were pretty good at storing CO2.
What happened on Venus was a runaway greenhouse effect.
If I called the topic of discussion to be my main study I'd destroy him the same way he'd beat me in his topic, which he wanted. It's the same thing when I got destroyed by a 3 year old in that Dora the Explorer game.You said the reason you didn't play is not because I'm amazing at Physics, in fact you think I'd be terrible, but because I'd cheat. That was your reason before.
That's not what I said. I said you're in a position to cheat. I also said you're in the same shoes as Edvard, the hot kickboxing alpha male stud who fucked 300 girls, meanwhile the guy was a complete simp in practice. The thing with you is you boast to be better than everyone in finance and intelligence and I find you ridiculous.
I laid out the reason as to why I never accepted your physics challenge, with background. It's the same thing as the Dora board game.
After I suggested we make it in a way that cheating is not possible, now the reason you refuse is because you know I'm good at it, and I'd win, like your god daughter beat you at her favorite game. This is just backpedaling on your earlier point. It's because you know better. You know you'd lose, you're even saying it yourself now, that's why you pretended cheating was the reason.
How would you make it so cheating isn't possible ?
I suggest you show us who you are. You don't have to.
Also. Smart people don't give a damn if someone doesn't find them smart. It's actually dumb in practice to try to convince people the way you are. Wanting to measure dicks.
Also I have a strong reason not to believe you've made 100 scientific discoveries. You'd be in the world record.
My point was that you actually KNOW Im good at Physics, and that's why youre refusing. This whole complaining about cheating was just your excuse. I have now made that point.
Just because you "made" a point key word. Doesn't mean it's true.
There's still the anonymity issue I have. <<<< You keep dismissing this.
One time Scarlett raped me in chess. She was fast and calculated like a level 10 Ai. I have no way of proving if that lady was that good for real or not. Could be or not. That's when I stopped playing online chess forever. Only in person.
Besides, I gave you other opportunities to prove yourself. You could post your list of intellectual achievements. However, again, you said you don't post it because you know I'd cheat, just like you said I'd cheat with the Physics competition.
Yes I think you would cheat.
You cheated on your wife. You lied to Xadem who also thinks you're full of shit. And you're determined for me to acknowledge you're better than me, while I actually think you're a dingbat.
Those are very good reasons for me not to trust you Legga. You're pissed off cause you don't have my trust, but would rather assume I have my head in the sand when I don't follow your instructions.
However, I think it's not cheating you're worried about. It's that you know my intellectual achievements are great. So you know I'd win. You know better than to play the game, just like you know better than to try solving Physics problems with me.
It's not that. It's simply you're able to cheat. There's also the possibility that every question that comes from the pop quiz is from YOU Legga.
.
.
.
You know, you really ought to humble yourself, and just keep doing whatever you do. One doesn't simply demand respect while being a big of a tyrant and gets it.
Then also look who's energy you're aligned with in these pages. To some people it's fine, but through my knowledge and experiences with those guys. Nope. I wouldn't have them representing me. For you it's good. Not me though.
Atmospheric CO2 (parts per million) measured from Antarctic ice. The CO2 concentration was pretty constant until the industrial revolution. There's furthermore evidence from proportions of isotopes and oxygen in the atmosphere that most of the added CO2 is the result of burning fossil fuels.
The reason Venus is a hot hell, worse than Venus on its surface than Mercucry that is closer to the Sun, is because it traps heat in its CO2-rich atmosphere.
The highest CO2 levels, 500 million years ago during the Ordovician period.
Right Legga ?
And that chart is like 1000 years long.
Legga said:We could try to solve some Physics problems instead if that's what you want then...?
This would be your chance to prove I'm fake instead of just making empty statements and then backpedaling from them! So, what do you say?
we're connected to the internet with the world at our fingertips, and you want to do a pop quiz. I've already accused you of cheating when you can.
We make it in a way that you can't just find the answer or get an AI to hand it to you; you agree then? Of course you can use the Internet, why woulnd't you be able to? If Internet solved Physics problems everyone would be Einsteins.
Ok, so no more backpedaling and excuses, you agree then?
And if I win, you'll add "Legga is smarter than me" as a quote under your account.
The highest CO2 levels, 500 million years ago during the Ordovician period.I dunno, but what do you think of the graph though?
It's good.
What CO2 PPM is considered dangerous for us Legga ?
Probably above 390 ppm (with current year being 420-430 ppm)?
What's your point?
My point is, it's way above. That is all.
I figured you brought it up cause I was talking about that with someone just today.
