Sociopath Community

Turncoat said: 

LiYang said: 

Good said: 

I am sure I didn't use it right, but what GPT said made no sense and it didn't help me use it right at all. I gave up after a few tries, I don't have hours to spend on this.

More failures, huh?  I find being specific to the input and the output variables to be important. I've had great success with IA coding. You should really watch that video I posted.

As he has expressed, which has been my experience as well, accessing the functions without the use of a middleman tends to give better results. 

The services hosting them otherwise are too busy maintaining their image to lean in on progress. 

 Are you calling AI the middleman? AI is a tool to be used to increase efficiency. Like any tool, it has to be used competently and correctly.

Check over Good's posts for context. 

Turncoat said: 

Check over Good's posts for context. 

 Seems Good is struggling to use AI. He may actually need help.

I mean, I started using it and AI has been hugely productive. When used correctly your productivity is increased maybe by 3 times. So one person can now do the work of 3. Two programmers fired and let go.

Nobody cares about your ai shit. Put shit in, get shit out. If I was buying then I would consider Good and wouldn't even consider your schizo ai shit Liyang. Just focus on coding and get hobby that's not complaining about vaccines.

LiYang said: 

Turncoat said: 

Check over Good's posts for context. 

 Seems Good is struggling to use AI. He may actually need help.

He understands it just fine, the problems are the public versions rather than his own. 

The services offering them to the public are purposely limiting their functionality, and if you read his posts you'd see they even admit as much. Since you won't even read the posts in question, I see less reason to take you seriously. 

Turncoat said: 

LiYang said: 

Turncoat said: 

Check over Good's posts for context. 

 Seems Good is struggling to use AI. He may actually need help.

He understands it just fine, the problems are the public versions rather than his own. 

The services offering them to the public are purposely limiting their functionality, and if you read his posts you'd see they even admit as much. Since you won't even read the posts in question, I see less reason to take you seriously. 

 What? Is he passing messages on to you now? How do you know what he understands?

He's done nothing but bitch a moan about his failures.

Yes I believe it will. 

I think there will also be a coder to overstand the Ai though.

A lot of those guys in machine learning are kinda afraid of the Ai at this point, probably for a good reason. In the future the Ai will do everything better than we can. It'll do things we don't understand and get even better at those things.

Whoever has the best Ai can rule the world, for that reason we won't stop using and developing it. Or else someone else will. 

Spatial Mind said: 

Yes I believe it will. 

I think there will also be a coder to overstand the Ai though.

A lot of those guys in machine learning are kinda afraid of the Ai at this point, probably for a good reason. In the future the Ai will do everything better than we can. It'll do things we don't understand and get even better at those things.

Whoever has the best Ai can rule the world, for that reason we won't stop using and developing it. Or else someone else will. 

 AI will never be like that. It's literally just a program that scrounges info from human beings so inherently it cannot replace human beings. The idea of it replacing humans is just fantasy propaganda asshats like you drool over.

Nope. It's gotten better, and getting better, and will be better than us at what we do. It's already producing better visuals than the world's leading CG studios.

One day. Yes one day, a simple request will yield high quality code. 

So far we've seen Ai dominate E sports. It played some video game and schooled the best in the world so hard, they adopted the Ai's tactics. For the first time an Ai defeated the world Go champion.

The Ai will drive better, solve traffic issues, be part of medical breakthroughs. It can find other worlds easier than we can ( they already use it for that )

Spatial Mind said: 

Nope. It's gotten better, and getting better, and will be better than us at what we do. It's already producing better visuals than the world's leading CG studios.

One day. Yes one day, a simple request will yield high quality code. 

So far we've seen Ai dominate E sports. It played some video game and schooled the best in the world so hard, they adopted the Ai's tactics. For the first time an Ai defeated the world Go champion.

The Ai will drive better, solve traffic issues, be part of medical breakthroughs. It can find other worlds easier than we can ( they already use it for that )

Nobody wants to watch AI trash that is beyond abstracted from any possible human valuation.

It's the laws of physics that AI is trash. Art and programming comes from the human brain, including its social valuations, and AI programs stealing the work of human brains is only going to be worse. This is literally the only physical possibility for AI.