Sociopath Community

Delora said: 

EpsilonMale said: 

Turncoat said: 

So you're willing to lie to her so she feels better, but not others? 

 

 You caught that little inconsistency

 you are really willing to jump on something that is not there 

Watch out for some people, Deloris. Those ones are out to get you.

What they just did to you in psychological abuse is called a DW ( Double Whammy ) where the attacker will gaslight you. That being Nathan's gaslit assumption in the form of a question painting as lying. Then 2nd subject intervenes and leans toward the abusers side making it a DW.

The way of the opportunist sometimes loses patience so they'll find what'll annoy you. In this case have your own word twisted, so you're not to be taken as an honest as you've claimed to be.

As for Epsilon. Regardless if that person was fooled by Nate's logic, or is an accessory to the abuse, well, neither looks good, so it matters not what they make themselves out to be in this case. Now of course this is my opinion, and to each their own. Watch out for those who'd give this puppet a glowing review, they won't be very friendly either. 

 /mfw a question is "abuse". 

Turncoat said: 

 /mfw a question is "abuse". 

 It's obvious abuse. Not to you though, cause you're not that bright.

Here's your follow up on your accusation in the form of a question.

You're combating the truth again Nate.

Giving her the crystals doesn't mean Delora is pretending she believes in it too.

Maninist said: 

Turncoat said: 

 /mfw a question is "abuse". 

 It's obvious abuse. Not to you though, cause you're not that bright.

Here's your follow up on your accusation in the form of a question.

Abuse is still a crazy sensitive word choice for a so-called "stoic" to claim. 

Apparently you must think it's okay to lie to people to get what you want, and for that matter only certain people. 🤷

You're combating the truth again Nate.

By asking a question? 

Isn't 'the truth' here that she's willing to lie to a pregnant person about crystals to make her feel better, but won't show others the same kindness over their own coping mechanisms? 

Giving her the crystals doesn't mean Delora is pretending she believes in it too.

Uhhh: 

Delora said:

All I said was "these are to help you feel safe"

Turncoat said:

White lies and omission are still lies, and the question stands.

Turncoat said: 

Maninist said: 

Turncoat said: 

 /mfw a question is "abuse". 

 It's obvious abuse. Not to you though, cause you're not that bright.

Here's your follow up on your accusation in the form of a question.

Abuse is still a crazy sensitive word choice for a so-called "stoic" to claim.

Gaslighting is abuse. You're also dealing with Delora.

Apparently you must think it's okay to lie to people to get what you want, and for that matter only certain people. 🤷

You already tried to deny your initial assumption by downplaying the nature of your question. With that why would I think what you're actually doing here to be okay ? 

You're combating the truth again Nate.

By asking a question? 

It's already been proven. Your argument is now that she lied. Something you came up with. 

Isn't 'the truth' here that she's willing to lie to a pregnant person about crystals to make her feel better, but won't show others the same kindness over their own coping mechanisms? 

What's true is you invented the idea she lied.

Delora simply fetched the woman's crystals.

Giving her the crystals doesn't mean Delora is pretending she believes in it too.

Uhhh: 

Delora said:

All I said was "these are to help you feel safe"

Turncoat said:

White lies and omission are still lies, and the question stands.

  It's the same as giving a child a teddy bear.

The lady believes the crystals grant her powers or abilities.

Giving her the the crystals is basic consideration.

Intuition. Yes many lack sense, while others just know.

.

I thought you were all about supporting women since you claim to be one ( with a penis ), but you have a way of belittling ( real ) female nature of ( real ) women whenever they take on the role of nurturer, which of course, you weren't built for physically and mentally. 

My mother forces me to look in the mirror before leaving the house, and forbids me from whistling. She'll knock on wood, or figuratively spit, too. I know that she knows it's irrational, but the emotional relation of safety and control which she feels by these compulsions persists. Sometimes it's more kind to accept other people's silly habits than to force logic down their throats. We could use some more mysticism in our society again, look at how we worship scientism nowadays - a direct result of a gap in our moral development which Nietschze pointed out too. Let the silly woman have her crystals

Maninist said: 

Turncoat said: 

Maninist said: 

 It's obvious abuse. Not to you though, cause you're not that bright.

Here's your follow up on your accusation in the form of a question.

Abuse is still a crazy sensitive word choice for a so-called "stoic" to claim.

Gaslighting is abuse. You're also dealing with Delora.

You seem to be gaslighting yourself at this point, over me asking a question. 

The rest of your post for the most part illustrates that you have no idea what I'm otherwise getting at. 

You're combating the truth again Nate.

By asking a question? 

It's already been proven.

The question wasn't answered. 

Turncoat said: 

Maninist said: 

Turncoat said: 

Abuse is still a crazy sensitive word choice for a so-called "stoic" to claim.

Gaslighting is abuse. You're also dealing with Delora.

You seem to be gaslighting yourself at this point, over me asking a question. 

You've been told multiple times, it simply wasn't a question, it was an insinuation.

The rest of your post for the most part illustrates that you have no idea what I'm otherwise getting at. 

HA HA HA. You're very hard headed.

By asking a question? 

It's already been proven.

The question wasn't answered. 

 She answered your question first thing. It just wasn't in line with what you had to offer next, which is the follow through with your baited questioning.  

You are the way you are, which you think you're smarter than others, while you have no belief in intuition and foresight simply because you don't have it. The truth is you're being monitored and evaluated by the very people you deliver low blows toward. Yes your question was an insinuation, it's no good nor is it redeemable, because, it is what it is. and what it is, is an insinuation. 

Maninist said: 

Turncoat said: 

Maninist said: 

Gaslighting is abuse. You're also dealing with Delora.

You seem to be gaslighting yourself at this point, over me asking a question. 

You've been told multiple times, it simply wasn't a question, it was an insinuation.

The rest of your post for the most part illustrates that you have no idea what I'm otherwise getting at. 

HA HA HA. You're very hard headed.

I can't really respond further than repeating that you're confused over my intent, and continuing to do so will have me called on for being redundant. 

Now why not let Delora answer her own question? 

It's already been proven.

The question wasn't answered. 

She answered your question first thing.

She gave an answer, but it didn't answer the question: "So you're willing to lie to her so she feels better, but not others?"

She's gone as far to say that she'd even wear a fish on her head over this if it's what she wanted, which has prompted me to ask why she does not entertain what she sees as delusions for others when otherwise so willing to do this for her over crystals. 

Seriously this isn't as complicated and weird as you're making this out to be. 

It just wasn't in line with what you had to offer next, which is the follow through with your baited questioning.  

You are the way you are, which you think you're smarter than others, while you have no belief in intuition and foresight simply because you don't have it. The truth is you're being monitored and evaluated by the very people you deliver low blows toward. Yes your question was an insinuation, it's no good nor is it redeemable, because, it is what it is. and what it is, is an insinuation. 

Turncoat said: 

Maninist said: 

Turncoat said: 

You seem to be gaslighting yourself at this point, over me asking a question. 

You've been told multiple times, it simply wasn't a question, it was an insinuation.

The rest of your post for the most part illustrates that you have no idea what I'm otherwise getting at. 

HA HA HA. You're very hard headed.

I can't really respond further than repeating that you're confused over my intent, and continuing to do so will have me called on for being redundant. 

The thread is how she made borscht for her pregnant sister in law. Or it was supposed to be. It's something else now. 

Now why not let Delora answer her own question? 

She responded to it, and it's all she's been addressing since she responded to it.

The question wasn't answered. 

She answered your question first thing.

She gave an answer, but it didn't answer the question: "So you're willing to lie to her so she feels better, but not others?"

Okay, but if you know English, what you've done is you've implied that she lied to her sister in law.

1) "So you're willing to lie to her so she feels better" = Insinuated statement  

2) "but not others ?" = Gaslit question. 

Part 1 is not a question. 

What you've done is sparked a false statement against Delora which can have real world effects such as people eating your bullshit like buddy over there nodding along with what they think you uncovered. It gets worse when whole groups adopt the fabricated statement. 

You did not ask "Would you be willing to lie so she feels better" See there's a difference. You also suggest a white lie is at play here, where there hasn't been. And who knows, you might even get the "yes" you're fishing for. 

One might argue the crystals offer a placebo effect, and while one can argue the crystals themselves aren't healing, a placebo effect is known to have real healing results in the medical fields.  If the lady feels like the crystals give her power, she'll have that extra wave, or find it in her to summon some courage.  

She's gone as far to say that she'd even wear a fish on her head over this if it's what she wanted, which has prompted me to ask why she does not entertain what she sees as delusions for others when otherwise so willing to do this for her over crystals. 

Seriously this isn't as complicated and weird as you're making this out to be. 

 Though I wouldn't recommend it, being someone's doormat for their amusement, such as using a fish for attire, doesn't equate to telling fibs.

An atheist can pick up and hand someone a Bible if they did so for various reasons, that doesn't mean the atheist is telling a lie.