Did I say no one should work at all? Fuck off with your shitty greedy self-important society retard.
Yes we are fighting off capitalistic rich pedophile predators and men are being killed and looted still for sure.
Did I say no one should work at all?
I'm saying that, moreover how it is inevitable.
Did I say no one should work at all?
I'm saying that, moreover how it is inevitable.
I'm saying that's naive. Most people think like Eagle does. Work = value = capital to them. There's no convincing them otherwise. They would rather make sure humans pick coal forever then let people not work.
Did I say no one should work at all? Fuck off with your shitty greedy self-important society retard.
Yes we are fighting off capitalistic rich pedophile predators and men are being killed and looted still for sure.
Dragoonback said:People like you want stagnation (coal mine working fantasy) so people still have to work. If a nuclear power plant is built, then housing and wiring, what else is left?
We have nuclear power plants and housing and wiring.
It's in your best interests for people to work. We also have to be organized.
That computer you're saving up for to assemble piece by piece. Each part is the byproduct of countless hours or work from thousands of people, all of who work for someone. Or else you won't be able to scrounge to save up for such a nice toy.
We barely have nuclear because oil has fought so successfully against it and they are funded by the government that prints their own money.
Also, people don't get to enjoy more efficient systems as capital locks them out of the benefits so it can reap a profit. So people don't get to enjoy less work being needed and they don't get to enjoy energy being free or even just cheap.
And those same thousands of workers and researchers are being exploited by capital.
I've seen you around for like 1/3 of your life and never have you claimed to be a woman, until it's become trendy. Before you were just bisexual.
Because of the shame, it's that simple. Rather than insist on my gender I let people guess it during Nabble.
I've harbored this belief since I was five, and I don't remember much before that age other than random shit like wearing a pumpkin costume and having had a pet dog. There hasn't been a point where this hasn't been a thing for me, but it was unpopular to make a fuss about it.
I also notice you're easily influenced by media
I've noticed you trying to shoehorn me into demographics, rather than me fitting them.
I'm not some unique snowflake to the point of not ascribing to normie issues, but you have a strange knack for guessing wrong over perceived extremes.
Maybe you didn't notice it over the last four months, but even left wing candidates' commercials noticed that leftist views are cringe. Attempting to take every perceived wrong of that "side" and apply it to every member of the party serves to blind you from why so many leftists either refused to vote or succumbed to the right during this voting cycle.
How Misscomm responded recently is actually closer to the mainstream left, it's ashamed of itself over perceiving it as pushing for the rights of minorities too hard to be relatable to the privileged.
so when they start teaching the new pronouns ( literally still new, plus the amount of genders is unknown, cause it's all bullshit... ) and teaching boys can be girls, you'll just gobble it up.
How long does "new" last, because I'm honestly tired of the pronoun battle even as someone in the advantaged position in it.
I don't give a shit what gender people call me now so much as judge them over the presumption. More often than not I see those toeing the line betray their attempt at being polite the minute they get aggressive.
The only ones ready to die on that hill are the ones with too much sunken investment, you saw the voting metrics just as early as I did. The disenfranchised remain a minority and there's much more fight ahead in the name of equal rights, but if it can be done for gay people then why not the gender-mistaken?
You'll say that's untrue, but you've always been bisexual, but now you claim to be something you're really not.
Admittedly, I am making an honest attempt to connect this to the earlier parts of your post, and I am struggling.
If you could help me with this part I'd really appreciate it for the sake of continuing the discussion. Believe it or not, the parts where you aren't shutting down I actually enjoy talking out, you say things that, while I don't agree with them, serve as points for me to do further research on demographics adjacent to your own.
I actually do learn a lot from our talks, which is why I push so hard to keep you talking. While you're quick to tell me you stopped reading, I make sure to read every word you've typed so that I can attempt to understand mindsets beyond my bounds.
It sounds to me like you're saying I'm claiming to be trans when I had formerly claimed to be bisexual? I'm both, I identify as femme in spite of my physical form and am attracted to both sexes.
I thought it was funny concept how you and your ex girlfriend ( ciss gender woman in your language) would be having what you'd call lesbian sex. What is it really though.
She's bi, and she didn't keep this a secret from anyone who discussed it with her.
Every ex I've had has been bisexual, every single one. Even my one night stands all ended up with bisexual people. If they wanted "both", I ended up gregarious.
This never took me bringing it up, they were all surprisingly forward with telling me that they find both men and women sexy. As the submissive in these relationships I've typically ended up with people who were comfortable talking about their thoughts, rather than waiting for me to ask them to answer my questions.
I've seen Transgenders who think the whole thing is horseshit. Transgenders man. The ones who don't insist they are what they're not, and still use the mens room no matter how dolled up they are.
See, if you actually gave me the time of day, you'd see I have a depressing amount in common with POV's like Blaire White to the point of feeling ashamed of myself. If it weren't for midgrounds like Contrapoints I might have ended up going that way.
I want to be better, but my depths go in her direction. Emotionally it's easy to look at trans people and be a critic about how they aren't "doing enough to pass", but then with enough time spent that way the question becomes "why am I judging them like cis people do when I have the same problem?".
I do believe in the freedom to be a faggot, but changing the language? I do not believe you're a woman.
So you see being homosexual on par with 4B and MGTOW, yet if I am not mistaken I see you targetting homosexuality significantly more often.
You're making it about how people are mentoring deviancy, I understand this much, but as a matter of Nature vs Nurture how much would you say accounts for homosexuality? Is it 50/50?
Biological men in olympics ? That's not fair to the women.
The day a biological woman takes a gold medal from a man in the olympics, it's the women who'll be beating their drums She is what she is.
Bruh even the left wing isn't supporting this shit anymore, you can't lump them together.
I will always argue that sport success has a strong basis on testosterone, which is why it's used as a supplement to improve performance. As much as skill is a superior factor, testosterone is more of a factor than sheer luck would be. That being said there are women with surprisingly high T-counts and men with surprisingly high E-counts, and in cases of those exceptions they outperform the norms of the opposite gender.
Did I say no one should work at all?
I'm saying that, moreover how it is inevitable.
I'm saying that's naive. Most people think like Eagle does. Work = value = capital to them. There's no convincing them otherwise. They would rather make sure humans pick coal forever then let people not work.
What will they do when there aren't jobs anymore?
I'm saying that, moreover how it is inevitable.
I'm saying that's naive. Most people think like Eagle does. Work = value = capital to them. There's no convincing them otherwise. They would rather make sure humans pick coal forever then let people not work.
What will they do when there aren't jobs anymore?
Take down as many people as they can with them. Same as always.
I'm saying that's naive. Most people think like Eagle does. Work = value = capital to them. There's no convincing them otherwise. They would rather make sure humans pick coal forever then let people not work.
What will they do when there aren't jobs anymore?
Take down as many people as they can with them. Same as always.
I figured they'd go through the same existential crisis every Capricorn faces when they retire, which is more of a singular struggle.
That might be me being too optimistic though.
We barely have nuclear because oil has fought so successfully against it and they are funded by the government that prints their own money.
Also, people don't get to enjoy more efficient systems as capital locks them out of the benefits so it can reap a profit. So people don't get to enjoy less work being needed and they don't get to enjoy energy being free or even just cheap.
And those same thousands of workers and researchers are being exploited by capital.
People are free to quit their jobs if they want. Start a new business. Learn some new skill.
Or do nothing with themselves.
