Sociopath Community

Of course you're not into that. You're a homosexual.

Just saying, a good obedient  women is bomb. #Maskoff

Maninist said: 

Atheism doesn't make one brighter or more creative

Wouldn't it offer them a broader medium to work from free of constraints? 

Certainly seems to be the case for 'Satanic' works. 

Turncoat said: 

Maninist said: 

Atheism doesn't make one brighter or more creative

Wouldn't it offer them a broader medium to work from free of constraints? 

lol don't make me laugh.

What boundaries would prevent a theist from, as you say, a broader medium ?

Certainly seems to be the case for 'Satanic' works. 

 Tell me about these satanic works.

Maninist said: 

Turncoat said: 

Maninist said: 

Atheism doesn't make one brighter or more creative

Wouldn't it offer them a broader medium to work from free of constraints? 

lol don't make me laugh.

What boundaries would prevent a theist from, as you say, a broader medium ?

Their religion would likely bar certain subject matter from being the focus. 

I don't imagine too many Sinless Christians being masterful with Hentai for example, that'd be sacrilegious and mark them as not-so-Christian. 

Certainly seems to be the case for 'Satanic' works. 

 Tell me about these satanic works.

You mean you don't know about how embedded Satanic symbols are within modern media motifs, let alone historical ones? 

They're practically in everything now. 

Turncoat said: 

Maninist said: 

Turncoat said: 

Wouldn't it offer them a broader medium to work from free of constraints? 

lol don't make me laugh.

What boundaries would prevent a theist from, as you say, a broader medium ?

Their religion would likely bar certain subject matter from being the focus. 

I don't imagine too many Sinless Christians being masterful with Hentai for example, that'd be sacrilegious and mark them as not-so-Christian. 

Christianity acknowledges that we are sinners, and we do sin. It's human nature.

Religion never barred anyone from doing what they will. It's why there are psychopathic priests and nuns that have done terrible things to people. 

Sin doesn't particularly produce great results. 

Certainly seems to be the case for 'Satanic' works. 

 Tell me about these satanic works.

You mean you don't know about how embedded Satanic symbols are within modern media motifs, let alone historical ones? 

They're practically in everything now. 

 So what do you make of those symbols ? Are they the mark of an atheist ? Or the mark of someone who knows there's a higher power ?

Maninist said: 

Turncoat said: 

Maninist said: 

lol don't make me laugh.

What boundaries would prevent a theist from, as you say, a broader medium ?

Their religion would likely bar certain subject matter from being the focus. 

I don't imagine too many Sinless Christians being masterful with Hentai for example, that'd be sacrilegious and mark them as not-so-Christian. 

Christianity acknowledges that we are sinners, and we do sin. It's human nature.

"So lets just keep sinning then"? 

Come on now that's not how it works. 

Religion never barred anyone from doing what they will. It's why there are psychopathic priests and nuns that have done terrible things to people. 

Sin doesn't particularly produce great results. 

A lot of our best works were made by arguably sinful people, it's kind of hard to deny that. 

 Tell me about these satanic works.

You mean you don't know about how embedded Satanic symbols are within modern media motifs, let alone historical ones? 

They're practically in everything now. 

So what do you make of those symbols ? Are they the mark of an atheist ? Or the mark of someone who knows there's a higher power ?

They're the mark of observant people who were given less-than-flattering labels by the church. 

Turncoat said: 

Maninist said: 

Turncoat said: 

Their religion would likely bar certain subject matter from being the focus. 

I don't imagine too many Sinless Christians being masterful with Hentai for example, that'd be sacrilegious and mark them as not-so-Christian. 

Christianity acknowledges that we are sinners, and we do sin. It's human nature.

"So lets just keep sinning then"? 

Come on now that's not how it works. 

You're answering your own question, which diverts your ability to understand.

Who says they keep sinning though ?

Religion never barred anyone from doing what they will. It's why there are psychopathic priests and nuns that have done terrible things to people. 

Sin doesn't particularly produce great results. 

A lot of our best works were made by arguably sinful people, it's kind of hard to deny that. 

Again. We're all sinners, but the best of what we have to offer never comes from acts of sin.

You mean you don't know about how embedded Satanic symbols are within modern media motifs, let alone historical ones? 

They're practically in everything now. 

So what do you make of those symbols ? Are they the mark of an atheist ? Or the mark of someone who knows there's a higher power ?

They're the mark of observant people who were given less-than-flattering labels by the church. 

 Oh, victim blaming and sympathy.

I'll ask again, are they atheists.

Maninist said: 

Turncoat said: 

Maninist said: 

Christianity acknowledges that we are sinners, and we do sin. It's human nature.

"So lets just keep sinning then"? 

Come on now that's not how it works. 

You're answering your own question, which diverts your ability to understand.

Who says they keep sinning though ?

Ideally they'd stop sinning if they're aiming to be successful in their religious practices, but within doing so they become limited on what they'll make. In that sense, an Atheist or Satanist would have a broader medium to work from free of constraints.

Your argument spans as far as saying that if someone is bad at following their own religion's practices that they'd possess the same freedoms. 

Religion never barred anyone from doing what they will. It's why there are psychopathic priests and nuns that have done terrible things to people. 

Sin doesn't particularly produce great results. 

A lot of our best works were made by arguably sinful people, it's kind of hard to deny that. 

Again. We're all sinners, but the best of what we have to offer never comes from acts of sin.

Okay then... a lot of our best works were made by unapologetically sinful people, and it's kind of hard to deny that. 

So what do you make of those symbols ? Are they the mark of an atheist ? Or the mark of someone who knows there's a higher power ?

They're the mark of observant people who were given less-than-flattering labels by the church. 

Oh, victim blaming and sympathy.

I'll ask again, are they atheists.

Once it became what today is known as "Graphic Design", it became Atheistic (unless you argue that Capitalism is it's own deity). 

It's more about function now, even if it borrows from some of the same symbology. 

Turncoat said: 

Maninist said: 

Turncoat said: 

"So lets just keep sinning then"? 

Come on now that's not how it works. 

You're answering your own question, which diverts your ability to understand.

Who says they keep sinning though ?

Ideally they'd stop sinning if they're aiming to be successful in their religious practices, but within doing so they become limited on what they'll make. In that sense, an Atheist or Satanist would have a broader medium to work from free of constraints.

Therefore it's impossible for a Christian to do what an atheist and Satanist can do ! oh my !

Even if a Christian tried his darndest to be perfect and succeeded, there will be no advantage from sin.

Do you know what Sin actually is man ? It's foolery. And nothing good that we've produced in history came about from defying God. 

Your argument spans as far as saying that if someone is bad at following their own religion's practices that they'd possess the same freedoms. 

Everyone is free to do as they will. 

Some of the worst people you'll ever see are Jihadists, and they are extremely religious. They will also fuck you up if you can't recite a single phrase from the Quran. They'll also kill you slowly for being queer. 

I don't think they produce good results, and they are worse than the typical Satanist, lest they're no different. 

A lot of our best works were made by arguably sinful people, it's kind of hard to deny that. 

Again. We're all sinners, but the best of what we have to offer never comes from acts of sin.

Okay then... a lot of our best works were made by unapologetically sinful people, and it's kind of hard to deny that. 

Sure. 

Nikola Tesla was a theist and he was the greatest inventor of all. I doubt he was perfect.

They're the mark of observant people who were given less-than-flattering labels by the church. 

Oh, victim blaming and sympathy.

I'll ask again, are they atheists.

Once it became what today is known as "Graphic Design", it became Atheistic (unless you argue that Capitalism is it's own deity). 

It's more about function now, even if it borrows from some of the same symbology. 

You don't know anything about Aleister Crowley it seems. 

You're also referring to Freemasonry. It's required to believe in a higher power if you're one of them. 

So they symbolism you're referencing that you suggest is so good, are from theists. 

.

.

There will never be a case of doing dumb shit, and pulling out a result that ends up being the best of what we've done. Maybe something can be discovered by fluke and that does happen, but by no means does that mean we should start acting like an ass  without boundary or discipline to find better results. 

Secular art doesn't mean the artist is an atheist either.

Regardless of one's belief, what produces good results are good principals. A stoic mind will yield better results than one congested with desire to do dumb shit. 

Sin  

So when you say "I'm an atheist, and I can comfortably go out of bounds and do dumb shit and that makes me better"!

I'll say good luck with that. And when you're stumbling comes across something half decent, tell the world.