Sociopath Community

nvm 

I've tended to have others telling me I'm smart rather than me exclaiming it about myself. 

It shows similar results out of people to Dunning Kruger generally. 

Turncoat said: 

I've tended to have others telling me I'm smart rather than me exclaiming it about myself. 

It shows similar results out of people to Dunning Kruger generally.

I think you're reasonably smart.

Did you know that while you yourself are bad at seeing the deficits in your own logic and personality, others aren't that much better either?

You, like others, order-rank people based on a substituted question rather than an objective standard. If you were now asked to produce a list of the dumbest and smartest people here, chances are you'd be producing a list of who you like or who you agreed with or who aligned their views with yours or according to the rules of reciprocation.

You can figure out the answer to the question better by coming up with an objective standard first, combining your standard with others' standards, asking everyone to score each person independently, according to that "unified" standard, and then combining the scores. And then re-visiting the problem again in 1 week and scoring people a second time and taking the average. Crazy.

Do you want to give it a try? We could find out who really is a genius and who really is an idiot, following the best current practices.

You really think Fried is dumber or equivalent to my intelligence? I'm right under average for US which is 97iq while mine is 95. Also for the state I live in I think it's more like a real average not under but I don't remember.

AppleGenius said: 

Did you know that while you yourself are bad at seeing the deficits in your own logic and personality, others aren't that much better either?

You, like others, order-rank people based on a substituted question rather than an objective standard. If you were now asked to produce a list of the dumbest and smartest people here, chances are you'd be producing a list of who you like or who you agreed with or who aligned their views with yours or according to the rules of reciprocation.

I'm more likely to award what I perceive as that instead through quickness, adaptability, and sympathy, which itself isn't brain power so much as brain speed. 

There are smart people with a very limited range, and dumb people with a willingness to try. I tend to like somewhere in between once it shows a recombination of intelligence with an openness to things outside of themselves, but yes this is moreso preferential rather than measuring IQ or something like that. 

Aren't those qualities you yourself have?

If I were to rank people based on a criteria I'd rank them according to a combination of IQ, academic success, career, and ability to adapt.

How would you rank the members here based on my and your criteria? Say, you give a score of 1-3. We can keep the list down to Good, Xadem, PalePeach, Friedrich, you, me, Alice, Blanc, Delora, and Spatial.

quickness, adaptability, sympathy, IQ, Academic success, career

1. Good: 2 1 3 3 2 2

2. Xadem 1 1 3 2 1 1

3. PalePeach 2 2 3 2 2 2

4. Friedrich 1 1 3 2 3 3

5. Turncoat 2 3 3 2 1 1

6. Legga 1 3 3 3 3 3

7. Blanc 1 1 2 2 2 1

8. Delora 1 1 2 3 2 2

9. Spatial 3 3 3 2 2 3

Adaptibility should be weighted double.

AppleGenius said: 

Aren't those qualities you yourself have?

I dunno, do I? 

Bruh, Delora has some of the worst sympathy and Peach has some of the best. I'm autistic but even I couldn't imagine being as self absorbed every second and for every belief. Like I get that as a male there's different standards for behavior but it just seems tiresome to be like that even I wanted to be.