Sociopath Community

FOTS said: 

 

I choose to use it as a litmus test to immediately identify someone I will never talk to again. 

 lol yes, basically this, unless it's not serious

I don't like that attributes are assigned instead of letting people be themselves.

astrology makes life more like an rpg, you are born with a set of traits and can choose your class later in life that either complements these traits or not. then there's ascension perks which you get through education and shit

Astrology is real my dude, but it corresponds more like a crop clock rather than star magic. 

Dragoonkz said: 

I don't like that attributes are assigned instead of letting people be themselves.

Life does not give choices, only the illusion of them. 

Your acts in a Deterministic framework are already all made for you, based on everything that preceded you guiding your hand and that of your environment. At most we are receptive to what we learn and otherwise along for the ride, but there is no real way around assignment. 

Turncoat said: 

Astrology is real my dude, but it corresponds more like a crop clock rather than star magic. 

Gonna have to find that thread of yours again, wanna know how it works exactly. Are there any sources online for this? I searched before but the vast scientific consensus is against your perspective. 

why do you think there isn't more official content on this 'realism astrology' ? 

I do not believe in astrology. Because I've seen little to none scientific explanation for it. It is fun tho.

That being said, when you are born does have a minor to major impact to your life, depending on your culture and goals. For example if you are born at the start of the year you are a few months older than your peers in school. It has statistically been shown that older peers are more favored in sports. Probably because sports teachers see them as larger.

Another curious thing is that your name also effects you life like that. People whose name is higher alphabetically are more likely to be picked in school.

Also the Nazis trusted astrology quite a lot. Tho Hitler distrusted it after it gave him a bad sign. Typically for him.

So when you are born might have some indirect relation to your life. Might prove astrology is somewhat true? But until I see it I will not believe it.

Xadem said: 

Turncoat said: 

Astrology is real my dude, but it corresponds more like a crop clock rather than star magic. 

Gonna have to find that thread of yours again, wanna know how it works exactly.

Here you go: https://sociopathcommunity.com/Forum/Topic/26437/1/astrology

In there Peach links to an even older topic too. 

Are there any sources online for this? I searched before but the vast scientific consensus is against your perspective. 

Odd, I've found a good deal of corresponding data in the Scientific community if you look it up in relation to "Seasons" rather than "Astrology". 

Astrology has been around for a long, long time, and there are enough signs and symptoms to deduce likely placements at least far enough to fairly easily gauge what they are not (if they are Fixed/Mutable/Cardinal, Fire/Water/Earth/Air, Seasonal tendencies etc). There are even physical traits that show an increased tendency based on birth time when put in conjunction with their genetics. It has been helpful for finding tendencies, even if their expression from their environment might adjust how they act on those urges and predisposed advantages. 

The problem is moreover the Scientific Community is both over how many are predisposed to not take it seriously, and the matter of finding good ways to test it. So far though through Seasonal Data people are starting to find some correlations, but they remain reluctant over using that specific word over how Demonized it's become. It simply needs more time. 

I thought it was all star nonsense and bullshit until I began noticing eye shape distributions correlating to seasonal patterns, which I noticed as an afterthought crosstrained with my general time spent people-watching after the fact. 

why do you think there isn't more official content on this 'realism astrology' ? 

From a lot of time spent on Independent Study. 

I started first by using sites to look at wide arrangements of facial data to compare physical tell likelihood, then I went into interviews for more recent examples and book quotes from much older sources to correlate tendencies, and I continued this for a good, good long time while taking notes and ignoring websites that teach you how THEY did it, complete with bullshit based around magic and feel-good rhetoric to try to pull in idiots. 

Once I felt that I'd compiled enough notes, I then let myself cross reference it and largely stuck to my own notes while borrowing their terminology. A lot of why I believe Astrology is from sleeplessly digging into it with my own two-hands in a hyperfocus moment after noticing Piscean and Scorpio eye shape, and after that period of my life I've found myself able to have a seemingly uncanny ability to deduce a sign from strangers, especially in recorded media over how it's less distracting compared to face-to-face. 

My findings are largely negative sounding, and only a few others I've found have that kind of honesty about the field. It's understood that either guessing it wrong or making it sound bad will push people away, which led to some "say only the good things" rhetoric following that I think holds the field back. 

I take it seriously not from reading on star chart bullshit, but from spending the time compiling my own data. I have then as a hobby turned guessing signs from shows like Hot Ones on Youtube into a game, and when Crow was still around we were fairly decent at it as a couple. 

If we ever travel the stars and sm1 is born in another star system, how would all this work?

Good said: 

If we ever travel the stars and sm1 is born in another star system, how would all this work?

I have wondered what kind of weirdo human would be made from being born in space, like in a space ship with altered conditions, but from it I instead found articles talking about how the conditions of ships weren't good for them and were being worked on to better accommodate them. 

As such, I am led to believe that those born within a space ship's controlled conditions, if they spent all nine months of pregnancy there, would reflect the conditions of the ship instead. 

The same from a different daily and yearly cycle on other planets, if we end up ever habitating one, would have to lend to either it's own chart with it's own calendar, or they might be offset at the very least by the passage of time slowing down the transition rate between days.

The conditions of the fetus for those nine months would still reflect the altered conditions, so I'm led to believe they'd still come out differently. This is also ignoring the conditions of the planet itself, like if we'd produce more Winter Humans if on a cold planet regardless of seasons, as climate seemingly has an impact on their development as well. 

We can straight up see seasons change how humans behave, as children and adults. Why would babies be immune to that?