Sociopath Community

AppleGenius said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

AppleGenius said: 

I thought the US military precisely targets people who lack critical thinking skills?

Exactly that. They specifically don't want to recruit transgenders for that reason. Sometimes the transgender detransitions.

Because transgender people don't lack critical thinking skills?

Because they do lack critical thinking skills -_-

 That's beyond me. I don't know where it comes from, nor can I tell you if it serves a purpose.

In the grand scheme, being straight is functional and serves a purpose. The 2 genders ( between all creatures ) are meant to be sexually attracted to one another, or select a mate of the opposite gender. There's a science behind it, with a higher purpose, or else we'll perish and never be again.

Homosexuality doesn't have a higher purpose. It's function is more self serving. Sodomy can also put someone in diapers when they're older due to a damaged anus, which is vile and unpleasant. In the grand scheme of things it appears to be a malfunction.

Being gay and a homosexual are 2 different things. I think for men in particular homosexuality is very destructive.

If you believe in the evolutionary hypothesis the reason we have more straight people is because straight people tend to procreate, while gay people tend not to. That may change in the future, with the invention of sperm banks. It'll be interesting to see what happens then. Dystopia? Or Utopia?

 Most western women today don't want children.

It'll be a Utopia for Islam. 

The west is going to become like Japan, where the majority of the population will be above 50, with less children being born. Despite being congested, Japan is facing a crisis where their popularion will vanish while the fewer left behind will experience an economic collapse.

The west, particularly North America, the same thing will happen, maybe it'll get real ugly in 20-30 years, or maybe when Generation X are all gone.

Islamic families are pretty large. The men have multiple wives and even more offspring. 

The modern western family are girlfriends and their pets. This isn't sustainable.

As far as God's plan goes, the Muslims are better than the tolerant Christians, while Christianity isn't even respected by it's greatest creation. The USA. 

Spatial Mind said:  

 That's beyond me. I don't know where it comes from, nor can I tell you if it serves a purpose.

In the grand scheme, being straight is functional and serves a purpose. The 2 genders ( between all creatures ) are meant to be sexually attracted to one another, or select a mate of the opposite gender. There's a science behind it, with a higher purpose, or else we'll perish and never be again.

Homosexuality doesn't have a higher purpose. It's function is more self serving. Sodomy can also put someone in diapers when they're older due to a damaged anus, which is vile and unpleasant. In the grand scheme of things it appears to be a malfunction.

Being gay and a homosexual are 2 different things. I think for men in particular homosexuality is very destructive.

If you believe in the evolutionary hypothesis the reason we have more straight people is because straight people tend to procreate, while gay people tend not to. That may change in the future, with the invention of sperm banks. It'll be interesting to see what happens then. Dystopia? Or Utopia?

Most western women today don't want children.

It'll be a Utopia for Islam. 

The west is going to become like Japan, where the majority of the population will be above 50, with less children being born. Despite being congested, Japan is facing a crisis where their popularion will vanish while the fewer left behind will experience an economic collapse.

The west, particularly North America, the same thing will happen, maybe it'll get real ugly in 20-30 years, or maybe when Generation X are all gone.

There's adoption agencies, and pregnancy hormones will continue to make the choice difficult for women. 

This is why in the rhetoric that they are given the choice, rather than abortions being mandatory. 

It'll be a Utopia for Islam.

Islamic families are pretty large. The men have multiple wives and even more offspring. 

As far as God's plan goes, the Muslims are better than the tolerant Christians, while Christianity isn't even respected by it's greatest creation. The USA. 

Are you really jumping ship now that your idol Tate is doing it? 

Dude. Andrew T8 has been a Muslim for several months now.

As far as Christianity goes it's been subject to my criticisms the whole time I've been here. Practices like consuming the host, or kneeling the statues goes against Biblical teachings.

If I decide to become a Muslim it isn't because Andrew Tate did it. Time and time again I've stated I don't like religion.

So you... aren't considering it then? 

Another thing Legga.

When the west collspses due to lack of manpower, and it seems like it will, the smaller population left over will be stuck with generational debt and interest they can never repay. The US will be indebted to other nations as well. Leaving the US at that point might be difficult.

Fools think we're going to settle for sperm banks at scale, meanwhile most women don't want children. They want Instagram and TicTok.

Spatial Mind said: 

Another thing Legga.

When the west collspses due to lack of manpower, and it seems like it will, the smaller population left over will be stuck with generational debt and interest they can never repay. The US will be indebted to other nations as well. Leaving the US at that point might be difficult.

Fools think we're going to settle for sperm banks at scale, meanwhile most women don't want children. They want Instagram and TicTok.

Just adopt, it's what a lot of gay couples are doing. 

Turncoat said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

Another thing Legga.

When the west collspses due to lack of manpower, and it seems like it will, the smaller population left over will be stuck with generational debt and interest they can never repay. The US will be indebted to other nations as well. Leaving the US at that point might be difficult.

Fools think we're going to settle for sperm banks at scale, meanwhile most women don't want children. They want Instagram and TicTok.

Just adopt, it's what a lot of gay couples are doing. 

 Adopting isn't the same as procreation you donkey.

Spatial Mind said: 

Turncoat said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

Another thing Legga.

When the west collspses due to lack of manpower, and it seems like it will, the smaller population left over will be stuck with generational debt and interest they can never repay. The US will be indebted to other nations as well. Leaving the US at that point might be difficult.

Fools think we're going to settle for sperm banks at scale, meanwhile most women don't want children. They want Instagram and TicTok.

Just adopt, it's what a lot of gay couples are doing. 

 Adopting isn't the same as procreation you donkey.

It'd still account for a large population of uncared for children. When populations actually show a struggle rather than a surplus, technology will likely be further along. 

Turncoat said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

Turncoat said: 

Just adopt, it's what a lot of gay couples are doing. 

 Adopting isn't the same as procreation you donkey.

It'd still account for a large population of uncared for children. When populations actually show a struggle rather than a surplus, technology will likely be further along. 

 That's sweet. It has nothing to do with what I've mentioned, nor does it contribute to the discussion I'm having with Legga, but it's very sweet. Adoption That's very nice.

You're going on about population reduction and straight women not wanting to raise children. 

In response, I brought up that adoption would cover for less children being born and that homosexuals are prime candidates to foster them. 

Why is population reduction even a problem right now? Adopted children can still join the army right?