So... Jim has posted CP on here once during some sort of manic episode, and since then it has been taken down and nothing else has come of it (we've also had an imitator who is now banned from doing this behavior on repeat to try to kick up dust).
He has also posted the same CP link (Serbian Mouse) in the Discord twice (but I handle the discord as separate from here), once for reasons I didn't witness and once more as a response against Tryp's drunken powergame.
There's two modes of thought on this that I have dubbed Moral vs Liable:Moral: People won't want to come to this website if they think kiddie diddlers frequent it.Liable: People won't want to come to this website if it supports the posting of kiddie diddling.
I personally lean towards Liability, and I feel in that regard that keeping the website free of cheese pizza is us doing enough. If we were to be brought into some sort of legal situation or court scenario or etc for whatever reason, we'd be able to more than argue that we were keeping such content off of the website. Like google and youtube, we show we have a policy in keeping it off, and people can expect that such content won't be what's left around.
The Moral issue though has been bubbling under the surface: There are people who either are or want to be offended by not merely the content, but the "scum" that would post such things. Even with the content kept off of the website, they find it deplorable to be seen next to such detestable roachkin regardless of their level of success vs failure on the website itself.
So, since people seem to want to make a huge deal out of this, how do we handle Jim?
i never actually read this properly, but tc had the gall to say jim posted cp once in a manic episode? who gives a fuck what kinda episode it was lmao, why did he take the stance of jims attorney?
