Edvard said:Just because you don't like that I'm right does not mean you have to convince yourself or others it's not true.
You really think that this is why people'd disagree with you?
Edvard said:Just because you don't like that I'm right does not mean you have to convince yourself or others it's not true.You really think that this is why people'd disagree with you?
Not always, but you, in this case.
Edvard said:Just because you don't like that I'm right does not mean you have to convince yourself or others it's not true.You really think that this is why people'd disagree with you?
Not always, but you, in this case.
Why do you think that this is the case here, and not simply a difference in opinion?
What has you convinced that I must not disagree with you in "reality", that it's not some "schizophrenic" thing that you'd otherwise rationalize it as for why I'd be disagreeing with you?
This isn't too different from your wanting Luna instead of Meta: Luna was easier for you to steer. You see this group as impossible for you to reason with, have demonized them, and now want them gone.
This sort of stupiidty coming out of you does make it seem like I'm wasting my time. I barely even talked to Luna.
"There is barely any CP here" is not an excuse when it is currently a dominating trait of SC. The question is how long it will last, and depending on this, how fast SC will clear up.
Turncoat said:What has you convinced that I must not disagree with you in "reality", that it's not some "schizophrenic" thing that you'd otherwise rationalize it as for why I'd be disagreeing with you?
Because you seem convinced of shit that did not happen. For example, me visiting SC only once a week, or CP still being a prominent problem on SC.
Turncoat said:What has you convinced that I must not disagree with you in "reality", that it's not some "schizophrenic" thing that you'd otherwise rationalize it as for why I'd be disagreeing with you?Because you seem convinced of shit that did not happen. For example, me visiting SC only once a week, or CP still being a prominent problem on SC.
So because what's happening doesn't match up with your view of things, people must be collectively lying to you?
Turncoat said:What has you convinced that I must not disagree with you in "reality", that it's not some "schizophrenic" thing that you'd otherwise rationalize it as for why I'd be disagreeing with you?Because you seem convinced of shit that did not happen. For example, me visiting SC only once a week, or CP still being a prominent problem on SC.
To be fair, you were sometimes even gone for multiple weeks. That is, unless you were visiting without logging in.
I don't care about the people doing it, but the content on this site has resumed being filled with CP rape and jokes. This is a place now for Jim and some of his followers (Cawk, TPG more recently) to fill with CP shit. Unless you do something about this, for it to stop, SC will die. I'll be among those leaving anyway. For both Moral and Liable reasons. I don't want to be associated with this crap, nor do I enjoy myself when I come here.
I don't want the new forum to be nothing more than a pedo cesspit either, but I believe that since we have full control over the software now we have better ways to steer what content is premiered than before. This will take some tinkering but I think it's a better path forward than ban on sight policies.
If we fail to combat CP this way and end up with a rampant pedo culture around here that very few want then we can always change tactics.
