Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
10 / 43 posts
Posts: 2266
0 votes RE: Jim: A Discussion On Policy

Classic 

Posts: 151
0 votes RE: Jim: A Discussion On Policy

I'd say erase the illegal content, give the cp posters 2 chances and if they still roach around, then you ban them.

Too lazy to change my profile picture
Posts: 1134
0 votes RE: Jim: A Discussion On Policy
Edvard said: 
Turncoat said:


This isn't too different from your wanting Luna instead of Meta: Luna was easier for you to steer. You see this group as impossible for you to reason with, have demonized them, and now want them gone. 

 This sort of stupiidty coming out of you does make it seem like I'm wasting my time. I barely even talked to Luna.

"There is barely any CP here" is not an excuse when it is currently a dominating trait of SC. The question is how long it will last, and depending on this, how fast SC will clear up.

 lol chill. no one except the kekers want cp & they just want it cos they need attn. and can't get it in other ways. Give admin time to get things sorted. It's Good.  As long as it's ok to use TOR and VPNs banning is basically moot. A rep system for posting links and images will prob be needed.  

I Took The Liberty Of Fertilizing Your Caviar.
Posts: 6
0 votes RE: Jim: A Discussion On Policy

Should be noted that all CP images will be reported to the authorities, as per the law.

This is not a threat or w/e, its just a fact that should be noted.

Posts: 1511
1 votes RE: Jim: A Discussion On Policy
Owner said: 

Should be noted that all CP images will be reported to the authorities, as per the law.

This is not a threat or w/e, its just a fact that should be noted.

 ah so thats why limey hasnt been on since, he got nailed

Posts: 5448
0 votes RE: Jim: A Discussion On Policy

I think the no CP rule is a good one. Just don't post CP, everything else goes. 

Posts: 31
0 votes RE: Jim: A Discussion On Policy

Gosh i miss Ed

Posts: 3965
0 votes RE: Jim: A Discussion On Policy

this wasn't the thread btw. the thread was literally called 'why is CP wrong?' and was on luna's SC

Posts: 3965
0 votes RE: Jim: A Discussion On Policy

Gosh i miss Ed

 aw me toooo. but for different reasons :D

Posts: 31
0 votes RE: Jim: A Discussion On Policy

this wasn't the thread btw. the thread was literally called 'why is CP wrong?' and was on luna's SC

 I think there was one here too but i just ran into this one

10 / 43 posts
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.