Sociopath Community

We've been condition in such a way, if it were made public that we have visitors, it wouldn't be such big news as it would've been 10 years ago. 

All contact with ET's should be done in a recorded G20 like setting. cause it can upset powerful militaries if the Aliens wanted to chill with say, Iran but not anyone else. 

Any advice like messages or suggestions from them would perceptually be a threat, as our species isn't used to being dominated by other species that are more powerful than we are. 

Only a hostile invasion will bring us together, or so we think. There will still be looters and other dumb asses cutting loose as though it's the end of the world so they might as well hog up the goods. 

If a powerful ET wanted to nerf us, they would kill off the working class and let the woke live to leave us to crumble, then probably brag how efficient it was to exterminate us that way. 

Cuckoo said: 

We've been condition in such a way, if it were made public that we have visitors, it wouldn't be such big news as it would've been 10 years ago. 

Better that than widespread panic, right? 

Men in Black handled this idea well enough when they said it was alien tech that gave us Microwaves and The Internet, that naturally they needed people to think it was humanity that made it to keep things civil. 

All contact with ET's should be done in a recorded G20 like setting. cause it can upset powerful militaries if the Aliens wanted to chill with say, Iran but not anyone else. 

That's assuming the ET's even have a perspective on leadership. That's always presumed in old school alien films, the whole 'take me to your leader' thing, whereas if they were a race without leaders that worked more socialist they'd find such a concept strange and alien. It's people who assume that leadership is the natural conclusion, but we don't see that in most species on Earth. 

Otherwise yeah they've gone with this idea in comics about Superman, especially the series titled 'Red Son' where he's Russian. 

Any advice like messages or suggestions from them would perceptually be a threat, as our species isn't used to being dominated by other species that are more powerful than we are. 

Pretty sure humans sublimate that vibe through racism. Having a species that is superior to humanity might be what it would take to do away with it in a relative sense, similar to how the world already handles Nationalism. 

It'd also be less of a shock for nations or people who are used to not being winners. 

I am convinced that racism exists because of how humanity's at the top of our own perceived pecking order. If we had to band together to stop humanoid lions from eating us, I'm sure that'd take precedent over someone with different skin color. 

Only a hostile invasion will bring us together, or so we think. There will still be looters and other dumb asses cutting loose as though it's the end of the world so they might as well hog up the goods. 

A common enemy has that effect. 

If a powerful ET wanted to nerf us, they would kill off the working class and let the woke live to leave us to crumble, then probably brag how efficient it was to exterminate us that way. 

They'd probably go with cutting off the head of the snake instead, causing panic over killing world leaders (or celebrities they mistake for leaders), if they have the intel to understand how we function rather than projecting their own alien presumptions. Killing an entire class of people is a lot more work than aiming for a few key figures, it's a matter of efficiency, as if the workers suddenly have no bosses for example then where will that work go? 

It's not even like Classism where you could introduce cheap-but-poisonous alternatives to building materials and food, can spread diseases, vices, and deviancy or other such things as to contribute to their rate of decay and stagnation. Hitting workers would require somehow hitting the common lines they all have, such as making them allergic to money (Paper Dermatitis?), lose their capacity for inhibition (Induced Hyperactivity via ADHD?), lose their ability to do Math (Modified Dyslexia, or a Numbers Aphasia?), or even chemically induced Nihilism like they had in the movie Serenity. There however comes a point where just burning everything down would be more efficient than introducing new concepts into humanity or specifically targeting key demographics solely. 

Also weird that you equate "Woke" with "Unemployed", would they leave the woke workers alive or kill them for having jobs, and if that's the case why not specify "unemployed" then? If there were no Woke Workers, then why do we have Unions? 

As tech replaces everyone's jobs we aren't even going to know what "workers" look like in the future, lending to technosocialist values becoming the norm. 

Turncoat said:

Also weird that you equate "Woke" with "Unemployed", would they leave the woke workers alive or kill them for having jobs, and if that's the case why not specify "unemployed" then? If there were no Woke Workers, then why do we have Unions?

As tech replaces everyone's jobs we aren't even going to know what "workers" look like in the future, lending to technosocialist values becoming the norm.

 Things that go woke gets destroyed. That's been proven time and time again. Hiring a woke person is just asking for drama and financial distress in the workspace. The reason for that is they are obnoxiously self absorbed and insist the world submit to their delusional demands.  

If some aliens weeded out people with their heads screwed on properly and left only the woke, they would certainly perish. They would also turn against one another, cause they lack any real discipline and believe in the way of tantrums. It's why we see Universities being dismantled before our very eyes. Woke people hijacking the grounds for Hamas. 

If the woke student ever finds glory in what they protested, they'll end up being dominated by Islam, who by the way hates everything about them. 

being an alien would be gay

Cuckoo said: 

Turncoat said:

Also weird that you equate "Woke" with "Unemployed", would they leave the woke workers alive or kill them for having jobs, and if that's the case why not specify "unemployed" then? If there were no Woke Workers, then why do we have Unions?

As tech replaces everyone's jobs we aren't even going to know what "workers" look like in the future, lending to technosocialist values becoming the norm.

Things that go woke gets destroyed. That's been proven time and time again. 

I feel like the right keeps this word intentionally vague so they can apply it to anything they don't like about the opposition. 

All the word meant before was to repeat over and over again the nature of an injustice still in effect so that it'd not become forgotten and buried. 

Put a pin in what 'woke' means in your case and this discussion will have room to go somewhere. 

The reason for that is they are obnoxiously self absorbed and insist the world submit to their delusional demands.  

Which ones are you meaning this time? 😏

I tend to see them preach tolerance. 

If some aliens weeded out people with their heads screwed on properly and left only the woke, they would certainly perish.

So we've now established as of this discussion that The Woke are not simply The Unemployed. There'd still be an active economy, supported further than ever before by Unions, now with people of a like mind not having to waste so much time and energy fighting with their disagreeable peers. There'd even be less people on Earth, granting those still around a better distribution of space and resources while still knowledgeable about agriculture.

There are woke farmers, someone's got to grow the avocados for their avocado toast. 

If there is still an active work force, and those who'd disagree with their idea of progress have disappeared, then where's the issue? 

They would also turn against one another, cause they lack any real discipline and believe in the way of tantrums. It's why we see Universities being dismantled before our very eyes. 

Over what issues though? Every people is destined to splinter and turn against eachother eventually, it's inevitable.

Either a counter-culture will be born of those who've embraced woke ideology to the point of putting us back to right where we started, or issues within the party will become more of an exaggerated split over relative scaling. 

The same could be said about the right, if they became the only party you'd see them split down the middle over Libertarian Businessmen versus Christian Fundamentalists. 

Woke people hijacking the grounds for Hamas. If the woke student ever finds glory in what they protested, they'll end up being dominated by Islam, who by the way hates everything about them. 

Wouldn't Islam and Hamas be weeded out by the aliens? 

Or are they woke now? 🤣

As usual, questions on top of questions, while others have none.  

Let them who knows, know, while the do nots, continue to do not. 

Buttered Toast said: 

The greatest limitation we have right now is that we have a sample size of 1 when it comes to known life in the cosmos.

 Absolutely, having just one example of life (Earth) to study is a major constraint in our understanding of life in the cosmos. It's akin to trying to understand an entire forest with just a single tree as a reference. To truly grasp the diversity and possibilities of life, we need more data points from other planets and celestial bodies. That's why space exploration and the search for extraterrestrial life are so crucial—they could provide us with the additional samples we need to broaden our perspective and deepen our understanding of life's potential forms and conditions. 

Nathan. Cleanup on aisle 4.

You always show off how mad you are with first names. 

Turncoat said: 

You always show off how mad you are with first names. 

For historical reasons,I like using your real name, so no I'm not mad. If I were mad you'd know for sure.  

Your male name is the real you, Natalie.