AppleGenius said:
It's people like you that are the easiest targets for people like inquirer. You're basically fanning his flames and have no clue you're even doing it. It's strange to see how easily you play into his pocket.
Even if he is a dozen puppets, why does it matter? What is the risk to any of us? Obvious puppets are obvious puppets, and i don't see how inq being the person behind them would make any difference.
If you’re not trolling you’re rather paranoid and mighty obsessed with Inquirer.
I'm not paranoid, I base all my observations and hypotheses on solid data and facts. I might be slightly obsessed since every one of you is so blind that you can't see what he's doing. The fact that he manages to fly under your radar, year after year, annoys me. It's like you don't even care about the facts or what is put in front of you. Even now, you made no effort to even ask about Inquirer's love letters to you. Instead of focusing on that, you just go 'Legga is so obsessed with Inquirer' as though my obsession was anywhere the level of insanity you show towards Chapo or at all relevant to the subject matter.
was just thinking that. he's taking obsession to another level, EVERYONE is inquirer at this point lmao
Everyone? I never said everyone is Inquirer. For example, you are not Inquirer. If you'd like to point out which person on that list shouldn't be there, feel free to do so. I'm just following the evidence.
You are rather illogical and emotional. Instead of criticizing what I say, you attack me as a person. It's people like you that are the easiest targets for people like inquirer. You're basically fanning his flames and have no clue you're even doing it. It's strange to see how easily you play into his pocket.
Inq hasn't even been here in months
Not as "Inquirer".
Trust me, he's here.
i didn't mean literally everyone lol.
if it turned out inquirer was a bunch of different puppets i wouldn't give a fuck. that's about it. in any case, some of the people you are accusing of being him make it clear you are biased and seeing him everywhere.
If I had to list all of Inquirer's sockpuppets that match his characteristics, I'd say the following:
- SensitiveSoul
- Missy
- MissCommunication
- Bitch
- MajorMajor
- Scarlett
- Max_Power
- TPP
- Allure
- LemurWhisperer
- BLM
- Swedish Chef
- goodgirl
- justicewarrior
- ScionReborn
- Girl Meat
- Pinocchio
- ChaiProbably a few misses, but I'd say it's mostly correct. Maybe 90% accuracy?
You can take out Girl Meat thanks
If I had to list all of Inquirer's sockpuppets that match his characteristics, I'd say the following:
- SensitiveSoul
- Missy
- MissCommunication
- Bitch
- MajorMajor
- Scarlett
- Max_Power
- TPP
- Allure
- LemurWhisperer
- BLM
- Swedish Chef
- goodgirl
- justicewarrior
- ScionReborn
- Girl Meat
- Pinocchio
- ChaiProbably a few misses, but I'd say it's mostly correct. Maybe 90% accuracy?
What metric(s) do you use for measuring your accuracy?
Even if he is a dozen puppets, why does it matter? What is the risk to any of us? Obvious puppets are obvious puppets, and i don't see how inq being the person behind them would make any difference.
It speaks volumes of Inquirer as a person. People think he's trustworthy, honest, intelligent, and kind. He's not.
Take a look at how he manipulated first Luna to close down her forum, pretending to be her friend and then backstabbing her. Same with Med, he has been taking advantage of her mental health issues. Then he posted his neighbor's kid's photo here trying to convince people that it's him, after using his SensitiveSoul account to try to encourage some of the less mentally stable people here to take radical action.
Everything is subjective and, in this sense, nothing matters. However, if we're willing to agree that moral bankruptcy is bad, then we would have to agree that Inquirer is deserving of moral contempt and that what he does, does matter.
I'm not saying that Inquirer's actions matter in the grander scheme of things, but I personally find it annoying that people don't realize he's not who he portrays to be. It's not that Inquirer is pretending to be someone else. It's more that the person, Inquirer, does not exist. It's a made-up character by the person who pretends to be Inquirer. That guy is literally nothing like Inquirer. The person behind the mask is basically a morally bankrupt scum who will take advantage of anyone he can in a heartbeat.
I mean look at how Inquirer behaves. Do normal people behave like that? They don't. It's a facade.
i didn't mean literally everyone lol.
if it turned out inquirer was a bunch of different puppets i wouldn't give a fuck. that's about it.
Inquirer doesn't exist. You've just avoided being Inquirer's target, that's why you don't care.
in any case, some of the people you are accusing of being him make it clear you are biased and seeing him everywhere.
"some of the people" like who? Be specific.
You can take out Girl Meat thanks
What metric(s) do you use for measuring your accuracy?
Bayesian analysis. I'd say it's a range of values, really. Very approximate. There's around 10% chance that the person is a non-native speaker, writes like Inquirer, hasn't spent a lot of time chatting with Inquirer, uses similar vocabulary, etc. But it's a sliding scale. SensitiveSoul, for example, is basically guaranteed to be Inquirer.
Turncoat said:I'm surprised how many are taking this list semi-seriously.
The public's perception of Inquirer has changed over the years. I think people are more likely now to see some of Inquirer's flaws, especially after that debate where much of his true nature was exposed.
I love the Inquirer conspiracy
I wouldn't really call it a conspiracy because Inquirer is one person and because the word has negative connotations associated with crackpots.
At this point, I don't think it's much of a secret, for example, that Inquirer is SensitiveSoul. He's practically admitted it. Would you still call it a secret if it were out in the open?
It's like saying that Good being an admin of this website is the website admin conspiracy because some people refuse to believe it or don't pay attention.
I love the Inquirer conspiracy
I wouldn't really call it a conspiracy because Inquirer is one person and because the word has negative connotations associated with crackpots.
In this case it'd be more of a pseudo-conspiracy wouldn't it?
It'd have the appearance of being pushed by a group in spite of being done by one person.
