Sociopath Community

AppleGenius said: 

Have you ever considered that perhaps you are suffering from erotomania and are simply not aware of it?

Sometimes, erotomania can be misdiagnosed by therapists as schizoaffective, as both share some traits of both "delusions" and "depressions".

Erotomania can piggieback as a delusional subtype onto Schizoaffective, Schizophrenia, and multiple mood disorders like Bipolar. Someone with both would be written on their case sheet as having one as a result of the other, as it takes the rush of going from a down phase to an up phase to make the thoughts rush too quickly to be corrected. 

That being said there's been no indications in my timeline of me seeking out people of status, rather there's multiple points of me dating people who are more within my class-range with disorders of their own. By the symptoms of Erotomania itself people in the field would not be presuming that subtype of delusion in particular, as there have not only been no indications of the behavior itself but it also has not granted me any significant impairment when it comes to living my life. 

Without more information to go on, it seems to remain a solid possibility, that your symptoms and behavior is caused by erotomania.

Unlike your case where you jump back and forth between making up life details and dropping the occasional truth in the middle of it, I've posted almost 30k on this forum alone. That ought to be a decent start when it comes to comparing and contrasting my timeline and behaviors with those like Turquie who legitimately express the problem near-constantly. 

On a more serious note, I don't believe in any of that.

I know, it was meant to illustrate a point, but it was done so in this case poorly by the standards of the field. 

I do think your thought process is abnormal, and I find it at times difficult to make progress with you, similar to someone else that I know who was diagnosed with schizophrenia. You tend to live in your own world, devoid of reason, logic, and without care for rigor. The method by which you form your opinions can be applied to form pretty much any opinion, which makes it flawed and I think explains some of your odd behavior.

I tend to find your average layman to do the same personally, most don't put all their thoughts through as many filters as you do. 

People tend to wing it, throwing out baseless opinions as naturally as coughing up phlegm, but there's always the room to ask what their basis is, where they acquired this opinion, to get their history far enough to grant context. Oftentimes their thoughts winged without rigor still have something to it, even if only at a comparative basis. 

Turncoat said: 

Erotomania can piggieback as a delusional subtype onto Schizoaffective, Schizophrenia, and multiple mood disorders like Bipolar. Someone with both would be written on their case sheet as having one as a result of the other, as it takes the rush of going from a down phase to an up phase to make the thoughts rush too quickly to be corrected. 

That being said there's been no indications in my timeline of me seeking out people of status, rather there's multiple points of me dating people who are more within my class-range with disorders of their own. By the symptoms of Erotomania itself people in the field would not be presuming that subtype of delusion in particular, as there have not only been no indications of the behavior itself but it also has not granted me any significant impairment when it comes to living my life.

It's moreso suspicious how you seem to constantly want to reaffirm that you don't. It's classical erotomania combined with social anxiety. Indeed, who's to say that your social anxiety and fear of being judged isn't masking your closet erotomania. It's certainly a possibility that cannot be ruled out.

Unlike your case where you jump back and forth between making up life details and dropping the occasional truth in the middle of it, I've posted almost 30k on this forum alone. That ought to be a decent start when it comes to comparing and contrasting my timeline and behaviors with those like Turquie who legitimately express the problem near-constantly.

The first bit is happening inside of your head. You can't cite a single thing that I've made up beyond that tongue-in-cheek/for-the-lols story about transitioning into being a female. Everything I've said here on the forum is true. You simply can't believe it, down to me visiting Ohio. I don't exist in your world because your ego cannot accept it, because it would devalue your lived experience. My story has been consistent throughout the 10 years I've been on this forum, more consistent than for example your story about getting a psych degree that you apparently didn't really have, from what I hear. You've essentially built your own la-la land about what kind of person I am, to the point that everyone, everyone on this forum had to tell you repeatedly that no I'm not cav and no I'm not harassing you with phone calls. It took you 6 months, cav being online at the same time as me, chatting at the same time, me telling you repeatedly that you're wrong, to accept that, and even then you didn't change your mind about the other stuff. That's how deep-rooted your delusions are.

The 30k posts thing, yeah, I believe your story. It's surprising you don't believe me, when I've been consistent throughout my being here, down to this very story, which you can probably also find on Luna's old forum in a slightly different form. I'm not bothered, but I am perplexed.

And, indeed, I would argue that your behavior resembles that of a erotomanian with social anxiety and fear of judgement. However, without having more to go with than what you've said, it's hard to make a definitive judgement. I'd definitely lean towards that hypothesis.

I know, it was meant to illustrate a point, but it was done so in this case poorly by the standards of the field.

Define the standard then, and I'll follow it.

I tend to find your average layman to do the same personally, most don't put all their thoughts through as many filters as you do. 

People tend to wing it, throwing out baseless opinions as naturally as coughing up phlegm, but there's always the room to ask what their basis is, where they acquired this opinion, to get their history far enough to grant context. Oftentimes their thoughts winged without rigor still have something to it, even if only at a comparative basis.

The average layman has a concept of fairness that they've developed through living in a society, which makes it generally, albeit not always, pleasant to interact with them. They can be reasoned with, and I'm quite good at it. Spatial, for example, can be reasoned with. He has some notion of fairness that he's willing to entertain. I do not find that you have this quality.

Well if you aren't even going to take this discussion seriously anymore then I think we're about good here. 

Good talk. 

Turncoat said: 

Well if you aren't even going to take this discussion seriously anymore then I think we're about good here. 

Good talk.

Now that is an example of the kind of behavior that got me C's and D's.

Good talk. Shame it came to an end right when it got interesting.

I'm not sure why you think I wasn't serious, I took the discussion very seriously. I merely used the same argumentation style as you use to show you how fruitless it is; it took you 2 posts to give up. Quod erat demonstrandum, q.e.d. My demonstration is complete.