Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
Posts: 33413
0 votes RE: Groomers

You're rendering it down to semantics to try to avoid looking at the bigger issue. 

Check into what girls have been going through for a good while now, grooming's always been a problem. You only seem to object however against more modern grooming threats. 

 So I'm talking about child grooming and this is what you have to say.

Do I need to pay heed to the poor ladies before I address this ?

I think western women have it the best. 

So it is just about the boys to you. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 2835
0 votes RE: Groomers

Grooming is done by both heterosexual and homosexual people, it's wrong and the only thing a groomer and pedophile needs is a bullet to the head. 

Hunt your local pedophile. 

Posts: 3137
0 votes RE: Groomers

KC Miller is a 21 year old female. She was given hormone therapy ( and had her boobs chopped off I think. )

This person wants to detransition back into a female. 

Some might argue that it's okay to groom children to be queer, and put them on puberty blockers and mutilate them. While others would say doing that to an underaged person is a crime.

In my opinion this is degeneracy going out of bounds. Stop grooming children and let them be who they are naturally without fucking them up and making them go insane. 

Posts: 3137
0 votes RE: Groomers

And another one.

Don't do this.

Posts: 2835
1 votes RE: Groomers

KC Miller is a 21 year old female. She was given hormone therapy ( and had her boobs chopped off I think. )

This person wants to detransition back into a female. 

Some might argue that it's okay to groom children to be queer, and put them on puberty blockers and mutilate them. While others would say doing that to an underaged person is a crime.

In my opinion this is degeneracy going out of bounds. Stop grooming children and let them be who they are naturally without fucking them up and making them go insane. 

 Transitioning children are often gay, the internalized homophobia often prompts families, especially religious families into accepting transition.

The problem with you conservatives talking about transitioning and wanting to stop it from happening to children (the only bit i agree with) is that most of you are so grossly homophobic that a large number of these children would suffer regardles. A majority of the girls transitioning are attempting to opt out of a sex based oppression system. Something that is continued by men on both sides of the political divide but one side is more obviously in favor of putting women down and dreaming of the good ol days while crying about how hard it is to be a cis while male in America. 

Posts: 2266
0 votes RE: Groomers

If we are to accept the following as the definition of grooming then grooming is a necessary practice. 

Posted Image

Any cultural or traditional practice is grooming. Education is grooming. 

What is acceptable grooming versus what is unacceptable grooming? 

If we agree Children should have a formal education then what should that education consist of? At what age should they learn about sex? Should they only learn about sex on a biological basis given it can far more easily be argued objective? Should they be aware of the subjective nature of gender, expression, and preferences? At what age? Should parents who groom their kids one way be able to opt out of certain offerings that would groom their kids in another? If lgbt literature is offered in classes should religious texts be offered as well? If a course on gender and sex is offered from a sociological/philosophical perspective be offered should courses that undermine those arguments too be offered? 

Posts: 33413
0 votes RE: Groomers

If we are to accept the following as the definition of grooming then grooming is a necessary practice. 

Posted Image

Any cultural or traditional practice is grooming. Education is grooming. 

What is acceptable grooming versus what is unacceptable grooming? 

There we go, this is the right question. It is super concerning to me how many people will accept one form of grooming over another simply because one of them seems more blatantly deviant at first glance, but there's A LOT  of subversive practices that we're absorbing every, single, day, and children during their formative years are even more open to absorbing it than usual, either to the point of developing a tolerance against it or a fixation with some aspect of it depending on if it resonates with them or not (as we can see from Disney being the origin gateway for multiple furries for example). 

It's even what has had many Conservatives talk about how colleges are evil, and this is also why Kanye right now is ranting about "Education" while founding Donda University. He isn't wrong about how much grooming is embedded into education, and he isn't wrong about how much he allowed himself to become conditioned by the porn industry through his cellphone addiction, but where he takes that fact is where it gets questionable. 

I was exposed to a lot of questionable media, but my folks were over my shoulder for a lot of it. In that sense the intended grooming had less room to worm it's way in over reformatting the environment to be about critical analysis (I was raised by an Advertiser and an Artist, it was inevitable). By simply being there, they found the room to make it more about their message instead of the media solely, and by the time they'd effectively trained me in how to watch it I began to do that for myself instead. 

If we agree Children should have a formal education then what should that education consist of? At what age should they learn about sex? Should they only learn about sex on a biological basis given it can far more easily be argued objective? Should they be aware of the subjective nature of gender, expression, and preferences? At what age? Should parents who groom their kids one way be able to opt out of certain offerings that would groom their kids in another? If lgbt literature is offered in classes should religious texts be offered as well? If a course on gender and sex is offered from a sociological/philosophical perspective be offered should courses that undermine those arguments too be offered? 

I don't think it can really be a uniform thing, some people are early bloomers even without environmental prodding while others can be chaste even while Rolling. Some are sharp when young and some are toddlers well into old age, the metric to try to help everyone at once is too chaotic to streamline effectively. It's actually more relative based on their environment, learning style, and speed of acquisition. 

This is where you enter the question over what parents should and shouldn't expose their kids to, and over how Standardized versus Free Market that you allow that to be. At the very least though tolerance could still be educated as a general tenant, a "Live and Let Live" Libertarian model rather than a Fascist Organism of Sociology. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on 12/20/2022 8:56:32 PM
Posts: 3137
0 votes RE: Groomers
Lenalee said: 

KC Miller is a 21 year old female. She was given hormone therapy ( and had her boobs chopped off I think. )

This person wants to detransition back into a female. 

Some might argue that it's okay to groom children to be queer, and put them on puberty blockers and mutilate them. While others would say doing that to an underaged person is a crime.

In my opinion this is degeneracy going out of bounds. Stop grooming children and let them be who they are naturally without fucking them up and making them go insane. 

 Transitioning children are often gay, the internalized homophobia often prompts families, especially religious families into accepting transition.

The problem with you conservatives talking about transitioning and wanting to stop it from happening to children (the only bit i agree with) is that most of you are so grossly homophobic that a large number of these children would suffer regardles.

That's false.

Everyone has haters, even queer people, and you might be surprised but it might have nothing to do with their sex, or whatever. Some of them are worthy of despise because they too can be assholes. 

What exactly is homophobia ? Fear of getting raped ? I would feel violated.

Am I afraid of queer people ? No. I don't know anyone who is, they are just people. Some people don't like them, some do, and others don't give a shit, and all of that is fine. It's like that for everyone.

 

A majority of the girls transitioning are attempting to opt out of a sex based oppression system. Something that is continued by men on both sides of the political divide but one side is more obviously in favor of putting women down and dreaming of the good ol days while crying about how hard it is to be a cis while male in America. 

In this case, we see parents grooming children to be queer. Teachers grooming children, government pushing this, big pharma. It's a business.

I don't give a shit about women who do it for such reasons. I'm too wise to worry about the ones that don't matter. I advise they don't do it cause they'll learn the hard way, I focus on the good ones. Or I used to anyway.

Anything with the potential to make money is what it's about. 

.

.

.

There's a transgender that goes by the name Dylan Mulvaney. He's disliked by other transgenders it seems. I don't fancy him either, but good for him for getting rich from becoming a star. Anyway that person is now getting his gender reassignment surgery. New tits. The balls and penis is going in place of, nothing. High risk of them not being able to save the components from his penis that give him pleasure. If that happens, Dylan will not find happiness at all. Bad idea. 

Posts: 2866
0 votes RE: Groomers

Children should be groomed to good little nationalistic fascists.

Cheery bye!
Posts: 2835
1 votes RE: Groomers
Lenalee said: 

KC Miller is a 21 year old female. She was given hormone therapy ( and had her boobs chopped off I think. )

This person wants to detransition back into a female. 

Some might argue that it's okay to groom children to be queer, and put them on puberty blockers and mutilate them. While others would say doing that to an underaged person is a crime.

In my opinion this is degeneracy going out of bounds. Stop grooming children and let them be who they are naturally without fucking them up and making them go insane. 

 Transitioning children are often gay, the internalized homophobia often prompts families, especially religious families into accepting transition.

The problem with you conservatives talking about transitioning and wanting to stop it from happening to children (the only bit i agree with) is that most of you are so grossly homophobic that a large number of these children would suffer regardles.

That's false.

Everyone has haters, even queer people, and you might be surprised but it might have nothing to do with their sex, or whatever. Some of them are worthy of despise because they too can be assholes. 

What exactly is homophobia ? Fear of getting raped ? I would feel violated.

Am I afraid of queer people ? No. I don't know anyone who is, they are just people. Some people don't like them, some do, and others don't give a shit, and all of that is fine. It's like that for everyone.

 

A majority of the girls transitioning are attempting to opt out of a sex based oppression system. Something that is continued by men on both sides of the political divide but one side is more obviously in favor of putting women down and dreaming of the good ol days while crying about how hard it is to be a cis while male in America. 

In this case, we see parents grooming children to be queer. Teachers grooming children, government pushing this, big pharma. It's a business.

I don't give a shit about women who do it for such reasons. I'm too wise to worry about the ones that don't matter. I advise they don't do it cause they'll learn the hard way, I focus on the good ones. Or I used to anyway.

Anything with the potential to make money is what it's about. 

.

.

.

There's a transgender that goes by the name Dylan Mulvaney. He's disliked by other transgenders it seems. I don't fancy him either, but good for him for getting rich from becoming a star. Anyway that person is now getting his gender reassignment surgery. New tits. The balls and penis is going in place of, nothing. High risk of them not being able to save the components from his penis that give him pleasure. If that happens, Dylan will not find happiness at all. Bad idea. 

 That's all. 

Transgenderism is the current thing, but before that it was a debate on whether on not gay people had rights mostly from the right. 

This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.