Sociopath Community

Spatial Mind said: 

Turncoat said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

Turncoat said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

Yeah I denounce child grooming from whatever.

Even religion? 

I'm not a fan of religion.

So you are against the idea of children being raised to believe in God as a matter of reinforced structure, be it in the home or in school? 

No. It isn't abusive to teach children about God. This IS NOT child grooming.

Actually, that is child grooming. Whether it is or isn't abuse is entirely within the realm of debate, but it is grooming in the strictest sense of the word: 

In this case, you are less against Child Grooming so much as you are against them being Groomed in ways you don't like. You're willing to accept Hooters while saying someone crossdressing to read a children's book is going over the line, your priorities are pure bias rather than over the themes of Grooming itself. 

Still curious how you feel over Australia's Hentai ban. 

 

Top G says...

This is the dude who grooms 18 year olds to become sex workers, he's like one or two steps away from being those people. 

 LOL says his haters. 

I didn't know Top G was self-loathing, he talks about it himself. 

No he doesn't have any 18 year old sex workers.

ffs he talks about it himself. 

He ran a class to teach others how to do it too, he was trying to franchise the idea.

 What he said about 18 year olds, are they are more desirable than women who have high body counts. This doesn't mean he's running around banging 18 year olds, who by the way are of legal age. But that's troublesome in my opinion. 

Top G is good to his ladies.

We talked about this before and even showing it to you then had you turn a blind eye. 

He would scope out 17 year olds to see if they're virgins and then basically be like "hit me up when you turn 18". He then talks about how he wants to imprint on them before any other man could be with them so that he can teach them how to act before they become "used goods" or "garbage". He however doesn't believe in turning away profit, so he would pimp them to other men and collect 75% of the profits as both financial gain and a way to turn garbage into recycling. 

It was later that it became about camgirl services, and we don't actually know if he's stopped pimping or not now that he's learned to keep that part of his life's mouth shut. There's more than enough records from his former resources to confirm that this was a part of his model, and even aiming to teach others how to do it. 

Dude's. A. Peeyump. 

lol No Nathan that isn't "Child Grooming"

Spatial Mind said: 

lol No Nathan that isn't "Child Grooming

Conditioning a child towards behaviors during their formative years is Child Grooming, you can't really get around the definitions. 

You are not against Grooming, you are against Homosexual Grooming. I repeat: 

Turncoat repeats:

In this case, you are less against Child Grooming so much as you are against them being Groomed in ways you don't like. You're willing to accept Hooters while saying someone crossdressing to read a children's book is going over the line, your priorities are pure bias rather than over the themes of Grooming itself. 

Turncoat said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

Turncoat said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

Turncoat said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

Yeah I denounce child grooming from whatever.

Even religion? 

I'm not a fan of religion.

So you are against the idea of children being raised to believe in God as a matter of reinforced structure, be it in the home or in school? 

No. It isn't abusive to teach children about God. This IS NOT child grooming.

Actually, that is child grooming. Whether it is or isn't abuse is entirely within the realm of debate, but it is grooming in the strictest sense of the word: 

In this case, you are less against Child Grooming so much as you are against them being Groomed in ways you don't like. You're willing to accept Hooters while saying someone crossdressing to read a children's book is going over the line, your priorities are pure bias rather than over the themes of Grooming itself. 

Still curious how you feel over Australia's Hentai ban. 

---

 

Top G says...

This is the dude who grooms 18 year olds to become sex workers, he's like one or two steps away from being those people. 

 LOL says his haters. 

I didn't know Top G was self-loathing, he talks about it himself. 

No he doesn't have any 18 year old sex workers.

ffs he talks about it himself. 

He ran a class to teach others how to do it too, he was trying to franchise the idea.

 What he said about 18 year olds, are they are more desirable than women who have high body counts. This doesn't mean he's running around banging 18 year olds, who by the way are of legal age. But that's troublesome in my opinion. 

Top G is good to his ladies.

We talked about this before and even showing it to you then had you turn a blind eye. 

He would scope out 17 year olds to see if they're virgins and then basically be like "hit me up when you turn 18". He then talks about how he wants to imprint on them before any other man could be with them so that he can teach them how to act before they become "used goods" or "garbage". He however doesn't believe in turning away profit, so he would pimp them to other men and collect 75% of the profits as both financial gain and a way to turn garbage into recycling. 

It was later that it became about camgirl services, and we don't actually know if he's stopped pimping or not now that he's learned to keep that part of his life's mouth shut. There's more than enough records from his former resources to confirm that this was a part of his model, and even aiming to teach others how to do it. 

Dude's. A. Peeyump. 

 I never turned a blind eye to anything Tate related. 

Andrew Tate ran a webcam business in Romania. All of the girls were looked after and treated well.

.

.

.

More on Topic, I remember when you questioned what's so bad about pedophiles, and now here you are wrecking my topic wanting to talk about Hooter's and Andrew Tate and try to reverse this on me or something.

I also noticed, all of the child molestors that came to this site are queer. Just an observation. 

This is about Child Groomers in the schools, and in government.

Spatial Mind said: 

Top G says...

This is the dude who grooms 18 year olds to become sex workers, he's like one or two steps away from being those people. 

 LOL says his haters. 

I didn't know Top G was self-loathing, he talks about it himself. 

No he doesn't have any 18 year old sex workers.

ffs he talks about it himself. 

He ran a class to teach others how to do it too, he was trying to franchise the idea.

 What he said about 18 year olds, are they are more desirable than women who have high body counts. This doesn't mean he's running around banging 18 year olds, who by the way are of legal age. But that's troublesome in my opinion. 

Top G is good to his ladies.

We talked about this before and even showing it to you then had you turn a blind eye. 

He would scope out 17 year olds to see if they're virgins and then basically be like "hit me up when you turn 18". He then talks about how he wants to imprint on them before any other man could be with them so that he can teach them how to act before they become "used goods" or "garbage". He however doesn't believe in turning away profit, so he would pimp them to other men and collect 75% of the profits as both financial gain and a way to turn garbage into recycling. 

It was later that it became about camgirl services, and we don't actually know if he's stopped pimping or not now that he's learned to keep that part of his life's mouth shut. There's more than enough records from his former resources to confirm that this was a part of his model, and even aiming to teach others how to do it. 

Dude's. A. Peeyump. 

I never turned a blind eye to anything Tate related. 

Andrew Tate ran a webcam business in Romania. All of the girls were looked after and treated well.

.

.

.

More on Topic, I remember when you questioned what's so bad about pedophiles,

That wasn't how it went and it's been explained to you 100+ times. 

More on Topic: 

Turncoat said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

lol No Nathan that isn't "Child Grooming

Conditioning a child towards behaviors during their formative years is Child Grooming, you can't really get around the definitions. 

You are not against Grooming, you are against Homosexual Grooming. I repeat: 

Turncoat repeats:

In this case, you are less against Child Grooming so much as you are against them being Groomed in ways you don't like. You're willing to accept Hooters while saying someone crossdressing to read a children's book is going over the line, your priorities are pure bias rather than over the themes of Grooming itself. 

Considering you're even willing to go as far as beat children to get the desired outcome, you kind of sound like an abusive groomer yourself. I don't think you're really in the position to say Trans people can't read childrens books to people while saying Hooters is fine. 

Do you even see how Hentai and Hooters could be used to, through straight themes, condition young girls to have sex with creepy adults? 

I also noticed, all of the child molestors that came to this site are queer. Just an observation. 

They've been either straight or bisexual, Jim as the poster child of that has been with many women, even had a really loud and passionate chapter over ChallengeSeeker. 

If you mean more like Psychopath Dave for example, I wouldn't call him queer at all. 

A straight pedophile ? In SC LOL.

We never had that many dude. Again. All of the pedo's that came here are queer. Just an observation. 

Spatial Mind said: 

A straight pedophile ? In SC LOL.

We never had that many dude. Again. All of the pedo's that came here are queer. Just an observation. 

I can remember three names, and I just mentioned two of them. 

Can't help but notice you keep dodging the questions over girl grooming, do you only care about the boys? 

CS is queer too. Psychopath Dave, I'm not sure tbh. I don't recall him disclosing being bisexual or not.

Regardless.

Child grooming has lead to young people regretting listening to grownups who thought they knew best. All of this stuff with giving children puberty blockers is fairly new.

Spatial Mind said: 

CS is queer too.

She's into dudes primarily, very primarily, and that makes for a fourth name for me actually. 

I was thinking of Cawk (and his myriad of other usernames), he's run the CP route but clearly has a mommy fetish once he gets close with a woman. 

Face it dude, the SC pedos have mostly leaned straight with, at most, homosexual dalliances. They range between straight and bisexual, sorry to break the news to you. 

Psychopath Dave, I'm not sure tbh. I don't recall him disclosing being bisexual or not.

He has had some penile curiosity but is in pretty hard denial. He's at most heteroflexible based on his comfort with women over men when it comes to feelings of power, and based on his age, when paired with the society he'd have been raised in he'd likely have many layers of homophobia conditioned into him. 

Child grooming has lead to young people regretting listening to grownups who thought they knew best.

It always has dude, check the L.A. scene over the past near-century if you want to feel horrified over specifically the kinds of grooming you're afraid of. 

It's not new, what's changed is moreso how accessible it is thanks to the internet through giving more people a platform to talk towards a public space. They hid in plain sight better before then through their more limited circumstances enough that people didn't know what to look for yet, either in weirdly perverse cartoons or through other forms of straight media that could be used to condition young people, usually girls, towards sex at an earlier age. 

All of this stuff with giving children puberty blockers is fairly new.

You're rendering it down to semantics to try to avoid looking at the bigger issue. 

Check into what girls have been going through for a good while now, grooming's always been a problem. You only seem to object however against more modern grooming threats. 

Turncoat said: 

 

You're rendering it down to semantics to try to avoid looking at the bigger issue. 

Check into what girls have been going through for a good while now, grooming's always been a problem. You only seem to object however against more modern grooming threats. 

 So I'm talking about child grooming and this is what you have to say.

Do I need to pay heed to the poor ladies before I address this ?

I think western women have it the best.