Sociopath Community

Good said: 

Tryptamine said: 

jews can leave twitter, we don't care

---

On the Trump thing, if him being able to post tweets is a threat to democracy, then that democracy is already fucked lmao.

Now, if you look at it from the authoritarian angle, it makes way more sense. He is not a threat himself, but if he is not silenced, he may breed more dissidents to the order, since he is a leader of sorts. Removing him will not just stop the increase of dissidents, but also be a good example.

If only the progressives would accept they are authoritarians, I may respect them a little more. Their goals are still pretty dumb tho.

 This is why I say everyone is really a communist and democracy is only good for those who don't have their way. 

Hawk said: 

Turncoat said: 

Tryptamine said: 

Turncoat said: 

Tryptamine said: 

let it go down in the history books that you are the most politically correct and tolerant person, and nothing i ever said had any validity at all

What are you even talking about with this weirdly defeatist statement? 

You act like you're oppressed or something over what a few people did to a few other people. Just call on them by name, you don't have to appeal back to Hitler's hayday to justify your points. 

 yeah good job you got the most brownie points, call them all out by name

You really can't see my motivations being anything more than moralfaggotry, rather than discussing how to actually get the points across in a constructive way? 

 I addressed them as the Jews in power, and the arguments carried on with claims of antisemitism.

I don't remember it going that way personally, but this is also more towards Tryp who, for whatever reason, isn't falling into the nuance he usually would. 

Turncoat said: 

Hawk said: 

Turncoat said: 

Tryptamine said: 

Turncoat said: 

Tryptamine said: 

let it go down in the history books that you are the most politically correct and tolerant person, and nothing i ever said had any validity at all

What are you even talking about with this weirdly defeatist statement? 

You act like you're oppressed or something over what a few people did to a few other people. Just call on them by name, you don't have to appeal back to Hitler's hayday to justify your points. 

 yeah good job you got the most brownie points, call them all out by name

You really can't see my motivations being anything more than moralfaggotry, rather than discussing how to actually get the points across in a constructive way? 

 I addressed them as the Jews in power, and the arguments carried on with claims of antisemitism.

I don't remember it going that way personally, but this is also more towards Tryp who, for whatever reason, isn't falling into the nuance he usually would. 

 

 Whatever. Let's look past the perception of antisemitism.

Is it true that anyone who criticizes the Jews, get's cancelled ?

We can criticize the whites. We can criticize blacks, like Al Sharpton ( personally I find he's a weasel ). But if it's Jews your banking and business dealings get fucked up.

Is that not real  ?

Hawk said: 

Turncoat said: 

Hawk said: 

Turncoat said: 

Tryptamine said: 

Turncoat said: 

Tryptamine said: 

let it go down in the history books that you are the most politically correct and tolerant person, and nothing i ever said had any validity at all

What are you even talking about with this weirdly defeatist statement? 

You act like you're oppressed or something over what a few people did to a few other people. Just call on them by name, you don't have to appeal back to Hitler's hayday to justify your points. 

 yeah good job you got the most brownie points, call them all out by name

You really can't see my motivations being anything more than moralfaggotry, rather than discussing how to actually get the points across in a constructive way? 

 I addressed them as the Jews in power, and the arguments carried on with claims of antisemitism.

I don't remember it going that way personally, but this is also more towards Tryp who, for whatever reason, isn't falling into the nuance he usually would. 

 

 Whatever. Let's look past the perception of antisemitism.

Is it true that anyone who criticizes the Jews, get's cancelled ?

We can criticize the whites. We can criticize blacks, like Al Sharpton ( personally I find he's a weasel ). But if it's Jews your banking and business dealings get fucked up.

Is that not real  ?

 Quit bastardizing Shalom, as “salmon” Shalom means “hello”. You are like Louis Farrakhan who disparaged the Jews and gays. Don’t know if you would recognize displays of antisemitism but the bastardization of a foreign language is offensive to many. Take heed.

Med. 

I translated Salmon akbar = Salmon is great. I like salmon.

Plus you're derailing the conversation now.

I am offended here why would I be the one commenting on Shalom it wasn’t me . 

Hawk said: 

Turncoat said: 

Hawk said: 

Turncoat said: 

Tryptamine said: 

Turncoat said: 

Tryptamine said: 

let it go down in the history books that you are the most politically correct and tolerant person, and nothing i ever said had any validity at all

What are you even talking about with this weirdly defeatist statement? 

You act like you're oppressed or something over what a few people did to a few other people. Just call on them by name, you don't have to appeal back to Hitler's hayday to justify your points. 

 yeah good job you got the most brownie points, call them all out by name

You really can't see my motivations being anything more than moralfaggotry, rather than discussing how to actually get the points across in a constructive way? 

 I addressed them as the Jews in power, and the arguments carried on with claims of antisemitism.

I don't remember it going that way personally, but this is also more towards Tryp who, for whatever reason, isn't falling into the nuance he usually would. 

 Whatever. Let's look past the perception of antisemitism.

Is it true that anyone who criticizes the Jews, get's cancelled ?

As I've been going on about with Tryp, it's about how it's done moreso than what is done. There's been talk about these things for a while now, what's being called out is over the tone of the message and it's room to incite a movement. The modern censor worries over not just the -isms, but even moreso the room for movements to start from them. 

If it is done in the BBC style, presents in a way that does not target an entire group of people altogether, or errs far enough over the line of parody, then it is still presentable. As such, I would argue that it is not anyone who criticizes them, but rather those who do so incorrectly. 

It's a matter of context. 

Med said: 

I am offended here why would I be the one commenting on Shalom it wasn’t me . 

 I know your sock puppets when I see them, and only you ever scolded me for that.

Turncoat said: 

Hawk said: 

Turncoat said: 

Hawk said: 

Turncoat said: 

Tryptamine said: 

Turncoat said: 

Tryptamine said: 

let it go down in the history books that you are the most politically correct and tolerant person, and nothing i ever said had any validity at all

What are you even talking about with this weirdly defeatist statement? 

You act like you're oppressed or something over what a few people did to a few other people. Just call on them by name, you don't have to appeal back to Hitler's hayday to justify your points. 

 yeah good job you got the most brownie points, call them all out by name

You really can't see my motivations being anything more than moralfaggotry, rather than discussing how to actually get the points across in a constructive way? 

 I addressed them as the Jews in power, and the arguments carried on with claims of antisemitism.

I don't remember it going that way personally, but this is also more towards Tryp who, for whatever reason, isn't falling into the nuance he usually would. 

 Whatever. Let's look past the perception of antisemitism.

Is it true that anyone who criticizes the Jews, get's cancelled ?

As I've been going on about with Tryp, it's about how it's done moreso than what is done. There's been talk about these things for a while now, what's being called out is over the tone of the message and it's room to incite a movement. The modern censor worries over not just the -isms, but even moreso the room for movements to start from them. 

If it is done in the BBC style, presents in a way that does not target an entire group of people altogether, or errs far enough over the line of parody, then it is still presentable. As such, I would argue that it is not anyone who criticizes them, but rather those who do so incorrectly. 

It's a matter of context. 

 So. Past the tone of the message and all that shit that emotionally distracts you for some reason.

Same question. Is it really happening ?

Hawk said: 

Turncoat said: 

Hawk said: 

Turncoat said: 

Hawk said: 

Turncoat said: 

Tryptamine said: 

Turncoat said: 

Tryptamine said: 

let it go down in the history books that you are the most politically correct and tolerant person, and nothing i ever said had any validity at all

What are you even talking about with this weirdly defeatist statement? 

You act like you're oppressed or something over what a few people did to a few other people. Just call on them by name, you don't have to appeal back to Hitler's hayday to justify your points. 

 yeah good job you got the most brownie points, call them all out by name

You really can't see my motivations being anything more than moralfaggotry, rather than discussing how to actually get the points across in a constructive way? 

 I addressed them as the Jews in power, and the arguments carried on with claims of antisemitism.

I don't remember it going that way personally, but this is also more towards Tryp who, for whatever reason, isn't falling into the nuance he usually would. 

 Whatever. Let's look past the perception of antisemitism.

Is it true that anyone who criticizes the Jews, get's cancelled ?

As I've been going on about with Tryp, it's about how it's done moreso than what is done. There's been talk about these things for a while now, what's being called out is over the tone of the message and it's room to incite a movement. The modern censor worries over not just the -isms, but even moreso the room for movements to start from them. 

If it is done in the BBC style, presents in a way that does not target an entire group of people altogether, or errs far enough over the line of parody, then it is still presentable. As such, I would argue that it is not anyone who criticizes them, but rather those who do so incorrectly. 

It's a matter of context. 

 So. Past the tone of the message and all that shit that emotionally distracts you for some reason.

Same question. Is it really happening ?

If by "it" you mean: 

Spatial Mind said:

Is it true that anyone who criticizes the Jews, get's cancelled ?

Then I answered the question: 

Turncoat said:

I would argue that it is not anyone who criticizes them, but rather those who do so incorrectly.

If you mean something else then you're going to need to be more specific.