Sociopath Community

Turncoat said: 

AppleGenius said: 

Well I feel like my state of mind is paradoxical because I'm happy to be miserable.

From others I've seen with that kind of problem, it tends to come over how they feel more of a sense of security over feeling right rather than feeling happy. 

 

yeah I would rather be happy than right because I realized that right is soo entirely subjective and varies from person to person like right is meaningless to me at this point  is anyone ever right ?  idk anymore being completely honest

I feel like someone can argue about something that someone thinks is right and "prove it wrong" no matter what it is,  does this make sense ?  like over almost freaking anything maybe even everything who knows....

It is probably because the term "right" can be facts based as in "correct" but can also be a moral judgment,  and if you cannot prove that someone is factually incorrect then you can probably prove that what they believe in is morally corrupt and so on  :p

"I am going to go drink this cup of tea"-  "oh you are going to drink your fancy cup of tea from your first world country grocery store when there are people in third world countries who slaved away in extreme heat and some who died from heat exhaustion who have never been able to afford having even the luxury of drinking one cup of tea in their life gathering the ingredients for your tea you selfish fuck"  and soo onn  :p

no wonder that people in third world countries are happier as they say,  because they probably do not have to deal with the subconscious shame and guilt that first world country people do-  but then again they get tortured and raped and murdered and imprisoned more often lol

wow I'm saying really deep stuff rn like uncomfortably deep lol  I should probably just stick to masturbating and talking about scat fetish stuff

compassionatequeen said: 

Turncoat said: 

AppleGenius said: 

Well I feel like my state of mind is paradoxical because I'm happy to be miserable.

From others I've seen with that kind of problem, it tends to come over how they feel more of a sense of security over feeling right rather than feeling happy.

yeah I would rather be happy than right because I realized that right is soo entirely subjective and varies from person to person like right is meaningless to me at this point  is anyone ever right ?  idk anymore being completely honest

I would still pin you as one who prefers to feel right to be happy, rather than one who finds feeling happy to be right. 

I feel like someone can argue about something that someone thinks is right and "prove it wrong" no matter what it is,  does this make sense ?  like over almost freaking anything maybe even everything who knows.... 

It is probably because the term "right" can be facts based as in "correct" but can also be a moral judgment,  and if you cannot prove that someone is factually incorrect then you can probably prove that what they believe in is morally corrupt and so on  :p

There is at the very least a relative, collective basis that follows trials to compare to, like the sciences for example. 

Turncoat said: 

compassionatequeen said: 

Turncoat said: 

AppleGenius said: 

Well I feel like my state of mind is paradoxical because I'm happy to be miserable.

From others I've seen with that kind of problem, it tends to come over how they feel more of a sense of security over feeling right rather than feeling happy.

yeah I would rather be happy than right because I realized that right is soo entirely subjective and varies from person to person like right is meaningless to me at this point  is anyone ever right ?  idk anymore being completely honest

I would still pin you as one who prefers to feel right to be happy, rather than one who finds feeling happy to be right. 

I feel like someone can argue about something that someone thinks is right and "prove it wrong" no matter what it is,  does this make sense ?  like over almost freaking anything maybe even everything who knows.... 

It is probably because the term "right" can be facts based as in "correct" but can also be a moral judgment,  and if you cannot prove that someone is factually incorrect then you can probably prove that what they believe in is morally corrupt and so on  :p

There is at the very least a relative, collective basis that follows trials to compare to, like the sciences for example. 

hmm idk  I mean I like to try to understand the deeper meaning of stuff but even that seems to be always evolving as I take in new perspectives that I hadn't thought of before

at what point will I truly have the biggest picture and the deepest understanding for why everything is the way that it is ?  and will I ever ?  probably not in this lifetime

When we talk, you will usually judge the merits of what's said over how much it does or doesn't conform to your understanding, rather than looking at what those thoughts are doing for them. 

People who question what they need to be happy begin to look at how certain mistakes in thinking may still lend to them being happier, while a factually based person would see accepting inaccuracy like that as too painful to compromise over. 

Turncoat said: 

When we talk, you will usually judge the merits of what's said over how much it does or doesn't conform to your understanding, rather than looking at what those thoughts are doing for them. 

People who question what they need to be happy begin to look at how certain mistakes in thinking may still lend to them being happier, while a factually based person would see accepting inaccuracy like that as too painful to compromise over. 

but I accept inaccuracy and my beliefs and self-concept have changed over time ?  soo how am I more concerned with being right ?

compassionatequeen said: 

Turncoat said: 

When we talk, you will usually judge the merits of what's said over how much it does or doesn't conform to your understanding, rather than looking at what those thoughts are doing for them. 

People who question what they need to be happy begin to look at how certain mistakes in thinking may still lend to them being happier, while a factually based person would see accepting inaccuracy like that as too painful to compromise over. 

but I accept inaccuracy and my beliefs and self-concept have changed over time ?  soo how am I more concerned with being right ?

Based on your history, rather than the self-concept you just began to cobble together, you have shown your concerns over feeling right to be a big enough deal to shut others down. 

By comparison, happiness seekers tend to look at another's mistakes, rather than just their own, and question what merits those mistakes otherwise have in making them happier or otherwise more content. 

Turncoat said: 

compassionatequeen said: 

Turncoat said: 

When we talk, you will usually judge the merits of what's said over how much it does or doesn't conform to your understanding, rather than looking at what those thoughts are doing for them. 

People who question what they need to be happy begin to look at how certain mistakes in thinking may still lend to them being happier, while a factually based person would see accepting inaccuracy like that as too painful to compromise over. 

but I accept inaccuracy and my beliefs and self-concept have changed over time ?  soo how am I more concerned with being right ?

Based on your history, rather than the self-concept you just began to cobble together, you have shown your concerns over feeling right to be a big enough deal to shut others down. 

By comparison, happiness seekers tend to look at another's mistakes, rather than just their own, and question what merits those mistakes otherwise have in making them happier or otherwise more content. 

you cannot generalize what "happiness seekers" do lmao,  that's stupid  I am a happiness seeker and I do exactly what a happiness seeker would do because I am one