Sociopath Community

Blue_Jay said: 

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

I found it funny that he's a kickboxer. 

Pretty sure that's past tense, I don't think he does it any more. 

Seems like a good place for him to put his hyperactivity, rage, and his monk RP fantasies, but if The Tales of Wudan are any indicator he now lives as a dark reflection of his former morals. While he's always seemed to have issues with women as a parallel to his mother while idolizing the dad that was almost never there for him (like a certain someone we know), it looks like it's getting worse as he gets more successful. 

The guy fetishizes pain and rage from a domming control freak perspective, it's even related to what got him kicked off the reality show Big Brother. Women aren't people to him, in spite of his few praises he has for them similar to how you might hear someone else talk about how amazing a dog's sense of smell is. 

To him, the fact that men lack "Intrinsic Value" makes them more real and more worthy of respect, as in his eyes only men have to work hard over not being born beautiful. At it's core is an insecurity that he was born the lesser gender, and he feels like he has to work that much harder to take the power back while subjugating them to prove to himself his own value. 

When he sees men not working as hard as he is he immediately is triggered into flashbacks of his chessmaster father, a father so insecure he couldn't even let his son enjoy superheroes over how he felt emasculated over other men being his role model. 

This whole piece is made up. 

His own words and stories back this up, it's all documented. 

Men who aren't born handsome only has to work out to become attractive. ( I've been saying the same thing for years ) In general women find 80% of men ugly. What makes a man handsome are the same features he'll obtain from being in shape.

6 months to 1 year is all it takes in most cases. And if the man is still ugly he'll at least score more often than he would have. From Homer to action hero. A man's default blessing, is his own potential, the rest is hard work and training, not being born that way, that's for women.

Tate however doesn't take a man's natural beauty into account, but rather would argue that muscle is a reflection of power and that women will betray their former stances for power, since he sees women as 'gifted' in assessing status. 

He further expresses this by saying that 'even women' will want to be with a beautiful woman, but men can only be earners with muscle being a part of that earning (as if many women don't feel a need to exercise to maintain their figure and shit). He'd then make some statement about how life is pain. 

Full Interview Released right now !

Earlier I posted the released 6 minutes of this interview. From the 6 minute clip we have the left saying Piers destroyed Andrew, while the right says Piers lost his composure while trying to bait Andrew, across multiple feedback. Very interesting.

 /mfw Spatial worships a kickboxing pimp

Turncoat said: 

 /mfw Spatial worships a kickboxing pimp

 I see a lot of myself in them. I'm here nodding along with most of what they say. Some stuff I've been saying for years.

The Tate Brothers don't like Tesla. I would take great pleasure in drag racing them with one.

Cancelled by platforms you probably never heard of, yet, more famous than ever. Worship ? No I can't bring myself to that, but I am a fan.

13 minutes in so far, and the debate's... kinda bad. The two really need a moderator to keep the two on track, as Piers trying to make his points at the same time as trying to reign in Tate's ADD is what's lending to the two constantly talking over eachother. 

Normally a host would invite someone to take the other stance while, as the host, moderate their discussion and throw in some words of his or her own from time to time. 

While Tate was caught in trying to worm out of making a direct statement, this could have been resolved a lot faster with someone peacekeeping the conversation. While compliments seem to pacify Andy, any time Piers suggests that Tate is struggling with anything he immediately has to interrupt him to assure him otherwise, it actually makes him unable to keep quiet and as a result muddies the ability to communicate further. 

16 minutes in: The audacity, to call Piers on interrupting him when he's been the sole interrupter from the start. Piers is to blame for repeatedly triggering Tate's need to defend his own intelligence, but Tate is near-contradicting himself over one point he won't explain out loud fully: That he feels entitled to his beliefs but also believes that he should phrase it more politically correctly. His defense boils down to "Well I didn't expect to become the most googled man, I would have said things differently".

Piers... did kinda catch him there though with him comparing legal authority over children to authority over one's wife. Bad format or not it is interesting to see him try to get Tate to give a straight answer on if a woman is or isn't meant to be his sub. The struggle here is that Tate is trying to present as a brand, while Piers is trying to present him as an individual. 

17:30 into it: Why won't Tate just say he's a dom, like holy shit. He is trying to explain the idea of a sub granting authority over them to their dom but he is refusing to use kink language. If he'd just call on it for the kink it is people would get it, this even calls back to what got him in trouble on Big Brother when he was consensually beating a woman with a belt. 🤦

26 minutes in: ...Piers is so bad at this holy shit. Tate's not doing too well either but he's not the one hosting this thing. 

28 into it: Wtf Piers shut up holy shit, like five times now Tate almost put his foot in his mouth and then he stops him. Piers asks him to answer what his stance is on women, Tate begins answering it, and then Piers goes right back to the "Come on man, admit that you regret something". 

30 into it: Piers: "I am just reading back things that you've said and am asking if you believe it", if Piers weren't so shitty at this that would have been a powerful line, as while it is true that Tate seems afraid to say the wrong thing Piers keeps trying to steer it to places that won't work on this kind of person. He found a snag that Tate can't angle through but he lacks the poise to fully execute it. 

35 into it: This dude really doesn't want to answer the "is he married" question, oh man if that got out that'd really ruin his "Exercise" as he calls it. 

Piers: "I'm over here" ...ehehe calling him on his eye contact struggle. That's kind of mean. 

Turncoat said: 

13 minutes in so far, and the debate's... kinda bad. The two really need a moderator to keep the two on track, as Piers trying to make his points at the same time as trying to reign in Tate's ADD is what's lending to the two constantly talking over eachother. 

Normally a host would invite someone to take the other stance while, as the host, moderate their discussion and throw in some words of his or her own from time to time. 

While Tate was caught in trying to worm out of making a direct statement, this could have been resolved a lot faster with someone peacekeeping the conversation. While compliments seem to pacify Andy, any time Piers suggests that Tate is struggling with anything he immediately has to interrupt him to assure him otherwise, it actually makes him unable to keep quiet and as a result muddies the ability to communicate further. 

---

16 minutes in: The audacity, to call Piers on interrupting him when he's been the sole interrupter from the start. Piers is to blame for repeatedly triggering Tate's need to defend his own intelligence, but Tate is near-contradicting himself over one point he won't explain out loud fully: That he feels entitled to his beliefs but also believes that he should phrase it more politically correctly. His defense boils down to "Well I didn't expect to become the most googled man, I would have said things differently".

Piers... did kinda catch him there though with him comparing legal authority over children to authority over one's wife. Bad format or not it is interesting to see him try to get Tate to give a straight answer on if a woman is or isn't meant to be his sub. The struggle here is that Tate is trying to present as a brand, while Piers is trying to present him as an individual. 

---

17:30 into it: Why won't Tate just say he's a dom, like holy shit. He is trying to explain the idea of a sub granting authority over them to their dom but he is refusing to use kink language. If he'd just call on it for the kink it is people would get it, this even calls back to what got him in trouble on Big Brother when he was consensually beating a woman with a belt. 🤦

 Was he consensually beating her with a belt?

Lenalee said: 

 

17:30 into it: Why won't Tate just say he's a dom, like holy shit. He is trying to explain the idea of a sub granting authority over them to their dom but he is refusing to use kink language. If he'd just call on it for the kink it is people would get it, this even calls back to what got him in trouble on Big Brother when he was consensually beating a woman with a belt. 🤦

 Was he consensually beating her with a belt?

That's the story at least. 🤷

Here's the 1 minute version that shows more of the dynamic, rather than the 30 second version that just shows the belting:
https://www.reddit.com/r/facepalm/comments/w175mc/andrew_tate_beats_his_girlfriend/

The slap is pretty dramatic looking on it's own but the rest of it looks like kink shit to me. Even when he's pulling her by the hair he's making sure to not tug too hard while she moves along with it. That being said the emotion he's putting into it doesn't seem healthy to me, consent or not, and I don't know enough about what led to this dynamic to figure what she is or isn't getting out of it. 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

13 minutes in so far, and the debate's... kinda bad. The two really need a moderator to keep the two on track, as Piers trying to make his points at the same time as trying to reign in Tate's ADD is what's lending to the two constantly talking over eachother. 

Normally a host would invite someone to take the other stance while, as the host, moderate their discussion and throw in some words of his or her own from time to time. 

While Tate was caught in trying to worm out of making a direct statement, this could have been resolved a lot faster with someone peacekeeping the conversation. While compliments seem to pacify Andy, any time Piers suggests that Tate is struggling with anything he immediately has to interrupt him to assure him otherwise, it actually makes him unable to keep quiet and as a result muddies the ability to communicate further. 

---

16 minutes in: The audacity, to call Piers on interrupting him when he's been the sole interrupter from the start. Piers is to blame for repeatedly triggering Tate's need to defend his own intelligence, but Tate is near-contradicting himself over one point he won't explain out loud fully: That he feels entitled to his beliefs but also believes that he should phrase it more politically correctly. His defense boils down to "Well I didn't expect to become the most googled man, I would have said things differently".

Piers... did kinda catch him there though with him comparing legal authority over children to authority over one's wife. Bad format or not it is interesting to see him try to get Tate to give a straight answer on if a woman is or isn't meant to be his sub. The struggle here is that Tate is trying to present as a brand, while Piers is trying to present him as an individual. 

---

17:30 into it: Why won't Tate just say he's a dom, like holy shit. He is trying to explain the idea of a sub granting authority over them to their dom but he is refusing to use kink language. If he'd just call on it for the kink it is people would get it, this even calls back to what got him in trouble on Big Brother when he was consensually beating a woman with a belt. 🤦

 Was he consensually beating her with a belt?

He smacks her face and beats her with his belt.

Notice she's wearing her sexy suit. 

This video surfaced at the time Andrew was on the show Big Brother UK and he ended up getting kicked off.

Today the video goes around more than ever, and we see some youtubers making long rants about it. 

It is pretty graphic, but it is what it is. People overreacted when they saw it cause well, it's pretty graphic.

Haters will hate, while for some of us, the truth prevails. 

Blue_Jay said: 

It is pretty graphic, but it is what it is. People overreacted when they saw it cause well, it's pretty graphic.

It's really not that graphic. 

They might be paid off, but my impression even before the link you just posted is that it looks like kink shit. 

Turncoat said: 

Blue_Jay said: 

It is pretty graphic, but it is what it is. People overreacted when they saw it cause well, it's pretty graphic.

It's really not that graphic. 

They might be paid off, but my impression even before the link you just posted is that it looks like kink shit. 

 Shut the fuck up when I'm talking to Lena.