Sociopath Community

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

The mental gymnastics. 

I mean your rapist could have said "TC was erect and therefore he was a willing participant in sex. He didn't say stop or push me off, it's not rape." 

And i would have still said it was rape based on what you have said and told us.

When it's convenient, and you wouldn't be as pushy about it as when you have the room to project onto the victim. 

I've only said you've been the victim when it was convenient to me? Where or when did i say that? 

It's moreover when you choose to say nothing. It's entirely dependent on who is talking about rape for if you do or don't get involved with the conversation. 

Again, you reached your neck out far more for CS. 

You're not doing this for Delora who didn't even knowing marital rape was a thing until people here told her. 

Having others support and listen to her helps her, and having her not keep bringing it up towards me from having others to talk to about it helps me. 

Block her. What you did under concern trolling didn't work out the way you thought it would. You literally just block her and voice call BR if you want to make certain it's him.

I already don't respond to her on Discord, and if she talks to me about anything else or talks to others instead then there's no issue. 

I don't see why that's so difficult. 

When we spoke of mars argo and you said you didn't believe your fave could have physically assaulted her cos she had a whiney voice and then said 'well how much harm could he have really done? Look at his skinny frame!" Was the first time i realized that you would defend someone in the wrong just because you favored them.

Bruh, it's Titanic Sinclair. The only bite that guy has in him are his words and apathy, and the text messages made that abundantly clear. 

Convenient how you bring up an example where you can immediately side with the woman though, without proof even. Your sexism continues to astound me. 

I showed you proof when we had that conversation years ago and when presented with the proof of him being at the very least a verbally abusive person that was smashing her glasses and breaking into her apartment you said 

"well how much harm could he have really done? Look at his skinny frame!"

It's not sexist to see proof and come to the conclusion of who is the abusers when there is literally YEARS of proof.

So we need to now take into account that every person prone to passive aggression is believably going to escalate into violence? You're welcome to posts the texts again to show how abusive Titanic is. 

You don't have real proof of anything over Titanic, and I stick by my belief over that dude being so constantly exhausted looking. 

 Hahahahahah go fuck yourself, passive aggressive? Dude literally broke into her place, smashed her glasses and punched her in the face while also threatening to release her nudes that the court had to tell him to delete and all you can say is that he looks too exhausted to hit a woman.

Lenalee said: 

When we spoke of mars argo and you said you didn't believe your fave could have physically assaulted her cos she had a whiney voice and then said 'well how much harm could he have really done? Look at his skinny frame!" Was the first time i realized that you would defend someone in the wrong just because you favored them.

Bruh, it's Titanic Sinclair. The only bite that guy has in him are his words and apathy, and the text messages made that abundantly clear. 

Convenient how you bring up an example where you can immediately side with the woman though, without proof even. Your sexism continues to astound me. 

I showed you proof when we had that conversation years ago and when presented with the proof of him being at the very least a verbally abusive person that was smashing her glasses and breaking into her apartment you said 

"well how much harm could he have really done? Look at his skinny frame!"

It's not sexist to see proof and come to the conclusion of who is the abusers when there is literally YEARS of proof.

So we need to now take into account that every person prone to passive aggression is believably going to escalate into violence? You're welcome to posts the texts again to show how abusive Titanic is. 

You don't have real proof of anything over Titanic, and I stick by my belief over that dude being so constantly exhausted looking. 

 Hahahahahah go fuck yourself, passive aggressive? Dude literally broke into her place, smashed her glasses and punched her in the face while also threatening to release her nudes that the court had to tell him to delete and all you can say is that he looks too exhausted to hit a woman.

All I remember is her word being taken at face value and some texts of him being passive aggressive. I never saw any texts of him threatening to out her nudes, I never saw photos of her bruises, and I cannot prove that she didn't break the glasses herself like CS did with her cellphone. 

Is this really all you need to feel like you're right? Did you even take his perspective into account, or did you just see a woman complaining and immediately took her side? 

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

When we spoke of mars argo and you said you didn't believe your fave could have physically assaulted her cos she had a whiney voice and then said 'well how much harm could he have really done? Look at his skinny frame!" Was the first time i realized that you would defend someone in the wrong just because you favored them.

Bruh, it's Titanic Sinclair. The only bite that guy has in him are his words and apathy, and the text messages made that abundantly clear. 

Convenient how you bring up an example where you can immediately side with the woman though, without proof even. Your sexism continues to astound me. 

I showed you proof when we had that conversation years ago and when presented with the proof of him being at the very least a verbally abusive person that was smashing her glasses and breaking into her apartment you said 

"well how much harm could he have really done? Look at his skinny frame!"

It's not sexist to see proof and come to the conclusion of who is the abusers when there is literally YEARS of proof.

So we need to now take into account that every person prone to passive aggression is believably going to escalate into violence? You're welcome to posts the texts again to show how abusive Titanic is. 

You don't have real proof of anything over Titanic, and I stick by my belief over that dude being so constantly exhausted looking. 

 Hahahahahah go fuck yourself, passive aggressive? Dude literally broke into her place, smashed her glasses and punched her in the face while also threatening to release her nudes that the court had to tell him to delete and all you can say is that he looks too exhausted to hit a woman.

All I remember is her word being taken at face value and some texts of him being passive aggressive. I never saw any texts of him threatening to out her nudes, I never saw photos of her bruises, and I cannot prove that she didn't break the glasses herself like CS did with her cellphone. 

Is this really all you need to feel like you're right? Did you even take his perspective into account, or did you just see a woman complaining and immediately took her side? 

 There is literally video of him breaking the glasses what

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

When we spoke of mars argo and you said you didn't believe your fave could have physically assaulted her cos she had a whiney voice and then said 'well how much harm could he have really done? Look at his skinny frame!" Was the first time i realized that you would defend someone in the wrong just because you favored them.

Bruh, it's Titanic Sinclair. The only bite that guy has in him are his words and apathy, and the text messages made that abundantly clear. 

Convenient how you bring up an example where you can immediately side with the woman though, without proof even. Your sexism continues to astound me. 

I showed you proof when we had that conversation years ago and when presented with the proof of him being at the very least a verbally abusive person that was smashing her glasses and breaking into her apartment you said 

"well how much harm could he have really done? Look at his skinny frame!"

It's not sexist to see proof and come to the conclusion of who is the abusers when there is literally YEARS of proof.

So we need to now take into account that every person prone to passive aggression is believably going to escalate into violence? You're welcome to posts the texts again to show how abusive Titanic is. 

You don't have real proof of anything over Titanic, and I stick by my belief over that dude being so constantly exhausted looking. 

 Hahahahahah go fuck yourself, passive aggressive? Dude literally broke into her place, smashed her glasses and punched her in the face while also threatening to release her nudes that the court had to tell him to delete and all you can say is that he looks too exhausted to hit a woman.

All I remember is her word being taken at face value and some texts of him being passive aggressive. I never saw any texts of him threatening to out her nudes, I never saw photos of her bruises, and I cannot prove that she didn't break the glasses herself like CS did with her cellphone. 

Is this really all you need to feel like you're right? Did you even take his perspective into account, or did you just see a woman complaining and immediately took her side? 

 There is literally video of him breaking the glasses what

I never saw it. 

Link? 

https://www.reddit.com/r/that_Poppy/comments/e5ylgz/leaked_footage_of_titanic_sinclair_throwing_wine/

Oh my. 

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

Turncoat said: 

Lenalee said: 

When we spoke of mars argo and you said you didn't believe your fave could have physically assaulted her cos she had a whiney voice and then said 'well how much harm could he have really done? Look at his skinny frame!" Was the first time i realized that you would defend someone in the wrong just because you favored them.

Bruh, it's Titanic Sinclair. The only bite that guy has in him are his words and apathy, and the text messages made that abundantly clear. 

Convenient how you bring up an example where you can immediately side with the woman though, without proof even. Your sexism continues to astound me. 

I showed you proof when we had that conversation years ago and when presented with the proof of him being at the very least a verbally abusive person that was smashing her glasses and breaking into her apartment you said 

"well how much harm could he have really done? Look at his skinny frame!"

It's not sexist to see proof and come to the conclusion of who is the abusers when there is literally YEARS of proof.

So we need to now take into account that every person prone to passive aggression is believably going to escalate into violence? You're welcome to posts the texts again to show how abusive Titanic is. 

You don't have real proof of anything over Titanic, and I stick by my belief over that dude being so constantly exhausted looking. 

 Hahahahahah go fuck yourself, passive aggressive? Dude literally broke into her place, smashed her glasses and punched her in the face while also threatening to release her nudes that the court had to tell him to delete and all you can say is that he looks too exhausted to hit a woman.

All I remember is her word being taken at face value and some texts of him being passive aggressive. I never saw any texts of him threatening to out her nudes, I never saw photos of her bruises, and I cannot prove that she didn't break the glasses herself like CS did with her cellphone. 

Is this really all you need to feel like you're right? Did you even take his perspective into account, or did you just see a woman complaining and immediately took her side? 

 There is literally video of him breaking the glasses what

I never saw it. 

Link? 

 I POSTEd IT LAST TIME TOO

Okay, so a dude breaks a wine glass. When you said "Glasses" and talked about punching faces I figured you'd meant he socked her one and busted her glasses. 

Alright, so now we have footage of a man who breaks things rather than hitting people, then complains about Conan O'brien. 

Turncoat said: 

Okay, so a dude breaks a wine glass. When you said "Glasses" and talked about punching faces I figured you'd meant he socked her one and busted her glasses. 

Alright, so now we have footage of a man who breaks things rather than hitting people, then complains about Conan O'brien. 

 ....

"Okay so he destroyed her property because he was mad she was in a Facebook group and didn't tell him which one, so what? He stalked her for years and had threatened to out her nudes that's nothing! He looks exhausted! I need to have video of him punching her in the face, nevermind the fact that he broke into her home smashed her property, stalked her for years, posted about her and her family on his social media, made a song about her and then-"

Just shut up 

Dude, it's a wine glass. You're making an entire case out of that and some texts. You can't even prove that he broke in. 

Care to link me where he said he'd out her nudes? Context really helps with these things, people say a lot of stuff. 

Turncoat said: 

Dude, it's a wine glass. You're making an entire case out of that and some texts. You can't even prove that he broke in. 

Care to link me where he said he'd out her nudes? Context really helps with these things, people say a lot of stuff. 

 The video literally has the screenshot of the broken door and there's a whole lawsuit you could look for if you like, it details plenty more.  Like i said when presented with proof you decide to ignore it in favor of the guy you like