Sociopath Community

MissCommunication said: 

Turncoat said: 

MissCommunication said: 

Turncoat said: 

So... having good things to say about someone when challenged to in a topic specifically about that means she's a Love Fraud Socio? 

We lived together for like seven years, it'd be weirder if I had little good to say about it. 

 and yet, she had nothing to say about it...

She'd responded to it in person before typing the tldr as a joke, but then again you never seemed to understand her humor. 

convenient. and she's not that funny, mostly pompous, except when she's thinking herself some machiavellian genius whose playing everyone behind the scenes - that shit is pretty funny, ngl

Like I said, you don't really seem to understand her humor. Even further the picture you paint of her's wicked Flanderized, you make her out to be some sort of dramatic villain who thinks herself scheme-y. 

Honestly, my response in that topic and her TLDR is symptomatic of the opposite of what was going on IRL; I struggle to give compliments while she otherwise hasn't, so I used the topic as an exercise to get as much out as I could think of and once the fingers started moving it proved to be easier than I thought it'd be. Her participating seriously when she IRL had already let me know plenty would have been largely redundant. 

(of those 7 years how many times did you break up/her cheat on you?)

Why, do you figure it's a lot? 

 idk - I generally think one time is enough

Then why'd you ask for a number? 

Turncoat said: 

MissCommunication said: 

Turncoat said: 

MissCommunication said: 

Turncoat said: 

So... having good things to say about someone when challenged to in a topic specifically about that means she's a Love Fraud Socio? 

We lived together for like seven years, it'd be weirder if I had little good to say about it. 

 and yet, she had nothing to say about it...

She'd responded to it in person before typing the tldr as a joke, but then again you never seemed to understand her humor. 

convenient. and she's not that funny, mostly pompous, except when she's thinking herself some machiavellian genius whose playing everyone behind the scenes - that shit is pretty funny, ngl

Like I said, you don't really seem to understand her humor. Even further the picture you paint of her's wicked Flanderized, you make her out to be some sort of dramatic villain who thinks herself scheme-y. 

hahha - her fake legga accounts are pretty funny 

Honestly, my response in that topic and her TLDR is symptomatic of the opposite of what was going on IRL; I struggle to give compliments while she otherwise hasn't, so I used the topic as an exercise to get as much out as I could think of and once the fingers started moving it proved to be easier than I thought it'd be. Her participating seriously when she IRL had already let me know plenty would have been largely redundant. 

she left you hanging, and for those of us who knew she was planning to leave you to have a monogamous relationship with someone else when you were so in love, it's just... just really sad. :(

 

(of those 7 years how many times did you break up/her cheat on you?)

Why, do you figure it's a lot? 

 idk - I generally think one time is enough

Then why'd you ask for a number? 

 cause I get the impression you have over-romanticized your relationship. Sometimes when you force a person to face the reality of something over their deeply held fairytale version it can help make things clearer. It's a light form of exposure therapy. 

MissCommunication said: 

Turncoat said: 

MissCommunication said: 

Turncoat said: 

MissCommunication said: 

Turncoat said: 

So... having good things to say about someone when challenged to in a topic specifically about that means she's a Love Fraud Socio? 

We lived together for like seven years, it'd be weirder if I had little good to say about it. 

 and yet, she had nothing to say about it...

She'd responded to it in person before typing the tldr as a joke, but then again you never seemed to understand her humor. 

convenient. and she's not that funny, mostly pompous, except when she's thinking herself some machiavellian genius whose playing everyone behind the scenes - that shit is pretty funny, ngl

Like I said, you don't really seem to understand her humor. Even further the picture you paint of her's wicked Flanderized, you make her out to be some sort of dramatic villain who thinks herself scheme-y. 

hahha - her fake legga accounts are pretty funny 

See that's fucking weird, I know she hasn't pretended to be Legga, but this might further explain some things if Legga's been acting like her towards you...

Man this shit just gets weirder. 

Honestly, my response in that topic and her TLDR is symptomatic of the opposite of what was going on IRL; I struggle to give compliments while she otherwise hasn't, so I used the topic as an exercise to get as much out as I could think of and once the fingers started moving it proved to be easier than I thought it'd be. Her participating seriously when she IRL had already let me know plenty would have been largely redundant. 

she left you hanging, and for those of us who knew she was planning to leave you to have a monogamous relationship with someone else when you were so in love, it's just... just really sad. :(

Those two spots in the timeline aren't even related..?

(of those 7 years how many times did you break up/her cheat on you?)

Why, do you figure it's a lot? 

 idk - I generally think one time is enough

Then why'd you ask for a number? 

cause I get the impression you have over-romanticized your relationship. Sometimes when you force a person to face the reality of something over their deeply held fairytale version it can help make things clearer. It's a light form of exposure therapy. 

I'm not really following your train of thought here, it seems to be couched on the presumption that she and I have broken up lots of times, and that I'd otherwise be overlooking such a thing (with you pre-emptively backtracking to saying 'one time is enough'?). 

Turncoat said: 

MissCommunication said: 

Turncoat said: 

MissCommunication said: 

Turncoat said: 

MissCommunication said: 

Turncoat said: 

So... having good things to say about someone when challenged to in a topic specifically about that means she's a Love Fraud Socio? 

We lived together for like seven years, it'd be weirder if I had little good to say about it. 

 and yet, she had nothing to say about it...

She'd responded to it in person before typing the tldr as a joke, but then again you never seemed to understand her humor. 

convenient. and she's not that funny, mostly pompous, except when she's thinking herself some machiavellian genius whose playing everyone behind the scenes - that shit is pretty funny, ngl

Like I said, you don't really seem to understand her humor. Even further the picture you paint of her's wicked Flanderized, you make her out to be some sort of dramatic villain who thinks herself scheme-y. 

hahha - her fake legga accounts are pretty funny 

See that's fucking weird, I know she hasn't pretended to be Legga, but this might further explain some things if Legga's been acting like her towards you...

Man this shit just gets weirder. 

Honestly, my response in that topic and her TLDR is symptomatic of the opposite of what was going on IRL; I struggle to give compliments while she otherwise hasn't, so I used the topic as an exercise to get as much out as I could think of and once the fingers started moving it proved to be easier than I thought it'd be. Her participating seriously when she IRL had already let me know plenty would have been largely redundant. 

she left you hanging, and for those of us who knew she was planning to leave you to have a monogamous relationship with someone else when you were so in love, it's just... just really sad. :(

Those two spots in the timeline aren't even related..?

Inq told me he wanted a monogamous relationship with crow and based on what she was saying he seemed to believe it was possible. That was September 2020. Your post was one year later. You got screwed, bruh. 

What else did Inq say? 

Turncoat said: 

What else did Inq say? 

 ask him

MissCommunication said: 

Turncoat said: 

What else did Inq say? 

 ask him

At this point it seems as if you're more honest than he is about the things you two talk about. 

Damn she really cheated through out the whole relationship lol

MissCommunication said: 

Turncoat said: 

Like I said, you don't really seem to understand her humor. Even further the picture you paint of her's wicked Flanderized, you make her out to be some sort of dramatic villain who thinks herself scheme-y. 

hahha - her fake legga accounts are pretty funny 

That actually makes surprisingly much sense, if it's true. I've had some time to think why Turncoat insists that I have multiple accounts here. I thought it was some sort of a joke that he played because I called Inquirer out on having multiple sockpuppets, but it's like he gets more and more invested in that weird narrative the longer time goes on, to the point of defending it even in the face of overwhelming evidence pointing to the opposite.

He's even started pouting at me over something someone else allegedly did to him, so I took it as him being genuine. However, now that you mention that his literal room-mate is creating these accounts, I call bullshit on Turncoat.

From what I've seen, the relationship was very private. Which is good. I really don't get these public relationships. Does not seem healthy. It allows all the drama seekers to chime in.