Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
10 / 36 posts
Posts: 169
0 votes RE: A hypothetical

Silence, if I think I can trust the person. Accuse, if I have any doubt.

 This is what it really comes down to.

Most Cordial Regards, Curator.
Posts: 872
0 votes RE: A hypothetical

Doesn't matter how much I trusted you before, I don't know how you think or act alone. 1 year -5mo I could see being silent, but a month? 

No way Jose. Accuse no matter what. You will never know a person's deepest personal agendas in a month.

visceral normality
Posts: 2647
0 votes RE: A hypothetical

Don't. Ever. Rat.

Like ever.

 

It's a code. 

Like don't ever call somebody a child molestor unless you believe in your guts that it's true, and you're willing to beat the living hell out of the person.

Because if you're mistaken, the person will beat the hell out of you, and all his friends will, too.

This is the biggest reason most of the people on this forum disgust me.

> U a pedo only means as much to these shitbag gossippy bitches as "fugly slut" or "u stoopid."

Where I come from, that's the sort of accusation that gets people killed.

 

And don't cut other people's grass.

 

But yeah, the only people it's ok to call the cops on are pedos, wifebeaters and dirty cops/screws.

Otherwise, you handle your beefs yourself.

 

And if you get picked up with your friend, you don't rat.

You just don't.

Posts: 2647
0 votes RE: A hypothetical

Oh game theory

Blah. The guy who wrote that little thought experiment is an ethical egoist and an Ayn Rand fan.

Canadian guy. Can't remember his name off the top of my head.

Ethics& Political Philosophy class was over 10 years ago :P

 

That was one of the most annoying things about Philosophy, imo.

Those Ivory Tower nerds knew nothing about how to promote social cohesion among outcasts.

"Honour among thieves" is an oxymoron to most of those guys.

I found his conclusions thoroughly annoying bc he approached his shit as if it were governed by laws of chance.

In reality, certain people are able to cram a fuckton of aces up their sleeves, while others are born with the deck stacked against them.

 

Codes like Don't. Ever. Rat. exist to lessen the damage that the former do to the latter.

Posts: 298
0 votes RE: A hypothetical
Xena said: 

Don't. Ever. Rat.

Like ever.

 

It's a code. 

Like don't ever call somebody a child molestor unless you believe in your guts that it's true, and you're willing to beat the living hell out of the person.

Because if you're mistaken, the person will beat the hell out of you, and all his friends will, too.

This is the biggest reason most of the people on this forum disgust me.

> U a pedo only means as much to these shitbag gossippy bitches as "fugly slut" or "u stoopid."

Where I come from, that's the sort of accusation that gets people killed.

 

And don't cut other people's grass.

 

But yeah, the only people it's ok to call the cops on are pedos, wifebeaters and dirty cops/screws.

Otherwise, you handle your beefs yourself.

 

And if you get picked up with your friend, you don't rat.

You just don't.

 Though it's not something I do, there are times where it's necessary to rat people out. In the case of being accused of someone elses crimes while you're stuck trying to prove your innocence. Or if you can't handle the abuse of being violated consistently, while your abuser trusts you won't break some unwritten protocol so they can keep draining your energy consistently.

Maybe you've come home to a stranger or someone you know looting your place and you get into a physical confrontation.

Following that rule just enables others to powercreep on you. 

Posts: 2647
1 votes RE: A hypothetical

If the roles are different and the guys who want information are mafiosos or bikers or w/e (not cops) I just pretend I'm drunk and crazy and I just met that guy and I have no clue wth is going on  or wth he does with his life. But thx for the warning if you rlly think he did that. Gah. The nerve of him   xP

Posts: 2647
0 votes RE: A hypothetical
Canary said: 
Xena said: 

Don't. Ever. Rat.

Like ever.

 

It's a code. 

Like don't ever call somebody a child molestor unless you believe in your guts that it's true, and you're willing to beat the living hell out of the person.

 

 Though it's not something I do, there are times where it's necessary to rat people out. In the case of being accused of someone elses crimes while you're stuck trying to prove your innocence. Or if you can't handle the abuse of being violated consistently, while your abuser trusts you won't break some unwritten protocol so they can keep draining your energy consistently.

Maybe you've come home to a stranger or someone you know looting your place and you get into a physical confrontation.

Following that rule just enables others to powercreep on you. 

 Nope. Like I said, you handle your own shit.

Someone else's crimes: you beat the hell out of the person accusing you. No cops neccessary.

Abuse: Beat the hell out of him, or get somebody else to beat him.

Thief in your apartment: again, beat the hell out of him and tell the cops he attacked first.

 

Nobody creeps on a girl who knows how to swing a hammer  :D

Posts: 298
0 votes RE: A hypothetical
Xena said: 
Canary said: 
Xena said: 

Don't. Ever. Rat.

Like ever.

 

It's a code. 

Like don't ever call somebody a child molestor unless you believe in your guts that it's true, and you're willing to beat the living hell out of the person.

 

 Though it's not something I do, there are times where it's necessary to rat people out. In the case of being accused of someone elses crimes while you're stuck trying to prove your innocence. Or if you can't handle the abuse of being violated consistently, while your abuser trusts you won't break some unwritten protocol so they can keep draining your energy consistently.

Maybe you've come home to a stranger or someone you know looting your place and you get into a physical confrontation.

Following that rule just enables others to powercreep on you. 

 Nope. Like I said, you handle your own shit.

Someone else's crimes: you beat the hell out of the person accusing you. No cops neccessary.

Abuse: Beat the hell out of him, or get somebody else to beat him.

Thief in your apartment: again, beat the hell out of him and tell the cops he attacked first.

 

Nobody creeps on a girl who knows how to swing a hammer  :D

 What if the criminal or abuser kicks your ass ?

The no snitch rule paves the way for evil.

When the punishment exceeds the limit, and you have the option to snitch, or be incarcerated for 20 years from something they did, one of these options are the better choice in every way, and given the circumstance, no one eill blame you.

Posts: 2647
0 votes RE: A hypothetical

Did I not just say that it's ok to call the cops on a woman beater?  :P

 

Also, I said it's ok to get somebody else to beat the guy if you can't handle him yourself.

And what abuser? I don't allow abusers in my life, thx.

The minute certain key phrases come out of a person's mouth, I ghost them. Period.

Abusers never find me.

 

And there's no way anybody could frame me for smthg that carries a 20 year prison sentence.

A stupid bitch tried recently to tell the cops I smashed her window lol

The Crown threw the case right out of court. All charges were withdrawn.

We have a decent court system, at least.

And I have no criminal record.

 

And who said anything about blame?

Idgaf what other ppl think of me. I follow the code bc it works.

I don't trust the system and I don't like cops.

So I handle my shit myself.

Posts: 33413
0 votes RE: A hypothetical
Xena said: 

Don't. Ever. Rat.

Like ever.

It's a code. 

It's generally where I'd err too, logically it is the better choice for a variety of reasons, but what do you if you figure they'd snitch you to save themselves, serve a five year sentence out of principle, hope for good behavior so your vengeance can be sought that much sooner? 😛

If the crime's something like possession of something, it'd likely affect how I'd respond versus if it were a murder or something. Having never been a part of a major crime there's a lot I don't know about myself over how I'd respond to the involvement. 

Like don't ever call somebody a child molestor unless you believe in your guts that it's true, and you're willing to beat the living hell out of the person.

Because if you're mistaken, the person will beat the hell out of you, and all his friends will, too.

This is the biggest reason most of the people on this forum disgust me.

> U a pedo only means as much to these shitbag gossippy bitches as "fugly slut" or "u stoopid."

Where I come from, that's the sort of accusation that gets people killed.

This is why pedos are trying to infiltrate parody and humor circles: To normalize the concept. Normalizing is the modern form of information warfare when it comes to inserting an agenda into mainstream sociology. 

Once it's less jarring to hear about from being old news or 'just a joke guise', they are that much less likely to get in trouble for it from their peers. 

And don't cut other people's grass.

Did... this ever go poorly for you? 

I'm trying to figure why someone would other than for profit. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
10 / 36 posts
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.