Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
10 / 106 posts
Posts: 32780
0 votes RE: For ChallengeSeeker's eyes only. I'm deeply enthralled by you
Turncoat said:
He straight up told me to not talk to you straight because you couldn't handle it.

what's the context?

This was super recently... how'd you forget?

so you would like more respect?

Did you even read her long post or just eyeball a random guess and give an upvote to get her off your back? 

Lip Service is so inauthentic, it's a shame you can only be honest when angry. 

not worth engaging with

Of course not, being authentic would make you look bad. 

nah, you've just been whiny and weak

"poor blanc, tryp's gonna be mean...but if you put out it woulda been different"

You've pretty much said as much yourself, and you fall into patterns. 

I do actually feel bad for Blanc, and I'm not saying she should put out, simply that you'd be singing a very different tune as an aspect of how shallow you are. 🤷

"that was super recent...is your memory like bad or something?"

It was literally less than 24 hours ago when I'd replied that way, having me suspect (and hope tbh) you were pretending to forget or something. 

You've shown a history of asking dumb questions to try to distract from the information itself, if not flood pages so that no one'd bother to read it. 

"did you EVEN READ her post? nah just lip service"

Your reply was a single sentence effectively asking her to confirm a summary that ignores most of what she was saying, and if she were better at reading social cues she'd see through it similarly to that of an English teacher looking over test papers. 

"you can't even be authentic!"

I mean am I wrong?

You don't just speak your mind with people, rather you tailor your words as to appease them in the moment as a guarded means of interaction. Then later on, usually with alcohol speeding this up and giving you an excuse for the behavior (but not that every time), you grow to resent a perceived lack of reciprocation and get slowly more angry until you explode at them with what you really think. 

I understand people not saying all the worst things they think about a person until they get pissed off, but yours reads more like you've been holding a ton of shit back and taking notes for when such a time is "Permitted", and those times feel like the only times you're being real with people over those being the only times you allow yourself to be openly analytical and more detailed, rather than saying broad statements, optimistic backpats, and otherwise trying to conform to how they present themselves instead of being your true authentic self. 

TLDR; You're an actor. 

it's not even just that you're wrong about everything, you're so snarky on top of it like you think you're making great quips with your cutting observations.

I did also link the former topics. You guys seriously do this every year, somewhat on a seasonal clock, and I'm not the only one to notice. 

How can't one be snarky or otherwise made to think it'd need to be done differently when they and I are otherwise reduced to repeating themselves? Lampshade hanging in it's own right is snarky, and otherwise polite or docile communication has nothing go through. It's easier to be seen as a bitch who's otherwise heard than it is to be 'Nice' with no affect whatsoever, as at least others are liable to see what's being said and the information will still coast on some level when made to be more noticeable. 

it just makes your behavior insufferable. plus a conversation with you about anything when you're like this just becomes a conversation where you try to push your perspective the whole time. no thanks to a waste of time being defensive against a bunch of accusations

It isn't that hard to have a conversation in this style when you have nothing to hide, just saying. 

The hiding's what ends up prolonging it, compared to if it were Alena and I talking for example where she can just say what's on her mind. That form of talk is more respectable compared to appeasement and enabling that you don't yourself genuinely believe in, allowing 'for their sake' in silence to their own detriment in exchange for a small sentiment of social safety. 

I'd rather be respected through consistency across the board than liked for saying the things they want to hear if I had to pick between the two, and for those who conflate them as if it were one thing I don't see as much depth nor genuine connection. If you can't shoot the shit with them then it's a waste of time. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on 1/24/2022 4:53:19 PM
Posts: 2504
0 votes RE: For ChallengeSeeker's eyes only. I'm deeply enthralled by you
Turncoat said:
He straight up told me to not talk to you straight because you couldn't handle it.

what's the context?

This was super recently... how'd you forget?

so you would like more respect?

Did you even read her long post or just eyeball a random guess and give an upvote to get her off your back? 

Lip Service is so inauthentic, it's a shame you can only be honest when angry. 

not worth engaging with

Of course not, being authentic would make you look bad. 

nah, you've just been whiny and weak

"poor blanc, tryp's gonna be mean...but if you put out it woulda been different"

You've pretty much said as much yourself, and you fall into patterns. 

I do actually feel bad for Blanc, and I'm not saying she should put out, simply that you'd be singing a very different tune as an aspect of how shallow you are. 🤷

"that was super recent...is your memory like bad or something?"

It was literally less than 24 hours ago when I'd replied that way, having me suspect (and hope tbh) you were pretending to forget or something. 

You've shown a history of asking dumb questions to try to distract from the information itself, if not flood pages so that no one'd bother to read it. 

"did you EVEN READ her post? nah just lip service"

Your reply was a single sentence effectively asking her to confirm a summary that ignores most of what she was saying, and if she were better at reading social cues she'd see through it similarly to that of an English teacher looking over test papers. 

"you can't even be authentic!"

I mean am I wrong?

You don't just speak your mind with people, rather you tailor your words as to appease them in the moment as a guarded means of interaction. Then later on, usually with alcohol speeding this up and giving you an excuse for the behavior (but not that every time), you grow to resent a perceived lack of reciprocation and get slowly more angry until you explode at them with what you really think. 

I understand people not saying all the worst things they think about a person until they get pissed off, but yours reads more like you've been holding a ton of shit back and taking notes for when such a time is "Permitted", and those times feel like the only times you're being real with people over those being the only times you allow yourself to be openly analytical and more detailed, rather than saying broad statements, optimistic backpats, and otherwise trying to conform to how they present themselves instead of being your true authentic self. 

TLDR; You're an actor. 

it's not even just that you're wrong about everything, you're so snarky on top of it like you think you're making great quips with your cutting observations.

I did also link the former topics. You guys seriously do this every year, somewhat on a seasonal clock, and I'm not the only one to notice. 

How can't one be snarky or otherwise made to think it'd need to be done differently when they and I are otherwise reduced to repeating themselves? Lampshade hanging in it's own right is snarky, and otherwise polite or docile communication has nothing go through. It's easier to be seen as a bitch who's otherwise heard than it is to be 'Nice' with no affect whatsoever, as at least others are liable to see what's being said and the information will still coast on some level when made to be more noticeable. 

it just makes your behavior insufferable. plus a conversation with you about anything when you're like this just becomes a conversation where you try to push your perspective the whole time. no thanks to a waste of time being defensive against a bunch of accusations

It isn't that hard to have a conversation in this style when you have nothing to hide, just saying. 

The hiding's what ends up prolonging it, compared to if it were Alena and I talking for example where she can just say what's on her mind. That form of talk is more respectable compared to appeasement and enabling that you don't yourself genuinely believe in, allowing 'for their sake' in silence to their own detriment in exchange for a small sentiment of social safety. 

I'd rather be respected through consistency across the board than liked for saying the things they want to hear if I had to pick between the two, and for those who conflate them as if it were one thing I don't see as much depth nor genuine connection. If you can't shoot the shit with them then it's a waste of time. 

 Update, he texted me back with a well thought out response in dm because he didn't want your "scathing reviews"

🌬️
Posts: 32780
0 votes RE: For ChallengeSeeker's eyes only. I'm deeply enthralled by you
 

 Update, he texted me back with a well thought out response in dm because he didn't want your "scathing reviews"

No shock there, easier for him to control the flow of information that way. 

Good to know he's scared of me though. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 2504
0 votes RE: For ChallengeSeeker's eyes only. I'm deeply enthralled by you
 

 Update, he texted me back with a well thought out response in dm because he didn't want your "scathing reviews"

No shock there, easier for him to control the flow of information that way. 

Good to know he's scared of me though. 

 I do not approve of this message you are presenting

🌬️
Posts: 32780
0 votes RE: For ChallengeSeeker's eyes only. I'm deeply enthralled by you
 

 Update, he texted me back with a well thought out response in dm because he didn't want your "scathing reviews"

No shock there, easier for him to control the flow of information that way. 

Good to know he's scared of me though. 

 I do not approve of this message you are presenting

You mean the truth? 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 4337
0 votes RE: For ChallengeSeeker's eyes only. I'm deeply enthralled by you

my exact wording was "didn't really want to make it a reply because i don't intend to make it material for other people to throw at me," since i think not everything needs to be content. but i guess it's going to be one way or the other, so might as well post what i said

11:51
Tryptamine:
hey, response to your post where you wrote a lot. didn't really want to make it a reply because i don't intend to make it material for other people to throw at me
11:52
Tryptamine:
i thought about it a fair amount, and it made me think a bit about how i treat people here. in the beginning of the forum, pretty much everyone was mean to each other and it was a pretty impersonal thing
11:52
Tryptamine:
over time that's changed. there's different people here. people are more interested in genuine connection rather than a toxic environment
11:53
Tryptamine:
i definitely leaned toward the toxic side and never really switched over...i think drinking made that super easy as well, not that it excuses anything
11:55
Tryptamine:
but reading how it affected you reminded me that you're not just avatar with some words on the site. you're a person that i interacted a lot with. i think the fighting we did some years back made it easy for me to dehumanize you in a way
11:56
Tryptamine:
but i thought it was a good post because you really explained well how you felt. i didn't just upvote it to get along like tc thinks, i upvoted it because it made me reconsider what i was doing
11:58
Tryptamine:
i'm going to try to be less of a toxic person...the forum isn't what it used to be, and the post made me realize i was affecting you more negatively than i thought i was
11:59
Tryptamine:
and that's probably true for other people as well. so yeah, good post. i think it's changed how i will approach things as i use the site :)

Posts: 2504
0 votes RE: For ChallengeSeeker's eyes only. I'm deeply enthralled by you

my exact wording was "didn't really want to make it a reply because i don't intend to make it material for other people to throw at me," since i think not everything needs to be content. but i guess it's going to be one way or the other, so might as well post what i said

11:51
Tryptamine:
hey, response to your post where you wrote a lot. didn't really want to make it a reply because i don't intend to make it material for other people to throw at me
11:52
Tryptamine:
i thought about it a fair amount, and it made me think a bit about how i treat people here. in the beginning of the forum, pretty much everyone was mean to each other and it was a pretty impersonal thing
11:52
Tryptamine:
over time that's changed. there's different people here. people are more interested in genuine connection rather than a toxic environment
11:53
Tryptamine:
i definitely leaned toward the toxic side and never really switched over...i think drinking made that super easy as well, not that it excuses anything
11:55
Tryptamine:
but reading how it affected you reminded me that you're not just avatar with some words on the site. you're a person that i interacted a lot with. i think the fighting we did some years back made it easy for me to dehumanize you in a way
11:56
Tryptamine:
but i thought it was a good post because you really explained well how you felt. i didn't just upvote it to get along like tc thinks, i upvoted it because it made me reconsider what i was doing
11:58
Tryptamine:
i'm going to try to be less of a toxic person...the forum isn't what it used to be, and the post made me realize i was affecting you more negatively than i thought i was
11:59
Tryptamine:
and that's probably true for other people as well. so yeah, good post. i think it's changed how i will approach things as i use the site :)

 I was trying to make you look good I wasn't trying to pressure this

🌬️
Posts: 4337
0 votes RE: For ChallengeSeeker's eyes only. I'm deeply enthralled by you

it's ok XD

Posts: 40
0 votes RE: For ChallengeSeeker's eyes only. I'm deeply enthralled by you

Also, this was supposed to be a thread about how someone wants to be my backup, not a place for you people to argue. I’d like to see this guy shave his body, minus his chest and get a bit skinnier and I’d love to make him my backup. 

 I'm currently dropping several pounds a week so there's that. 

Posts: 601
0 votes RE: For ChallengeSeeker's eyes only. I'm deeply enthralled by you

Also, this was supposed to be a thread about how someone wants to be my backup, not a place for you people to argue. I’d like to see this guy shave his body, minus his chest and get a bit skinnier and I’d love to make him my backup. 

 I'm currently dropping several pounds a week so there's that. 

 Excellent 😈 You may turn out to be a great backup for me. 

10 / 106 posts
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.