Sociopath Community

JesusistheKing said: 

but maybe I'll just start masturbating and thinking of Jesus only to help with my sexual addiction issues 

That sounds super profane. 

JesusistheKing said: 

Turncoat said: 

JesusistheKing said: 

Turncoat said: 

JesusistheKing said: 

Turncoat said: 

JesusistheKing said: 

Turncoat said: 

it is really actually simple, and you suggesting that I marry a normal man would actually be pedophilia for me, since I am the divine Mother and Jesus is my actual husband not just like symbolic as in when he calls his wife the church, the church is his wife but I am like the representation of the entire church and his significant other and partner, this is how He has explained it to me

It's not pedophilia unless they're under 18, and this didn't stop God from impregnating a human so why should this stop you? 

The Virgin Mary was 14 when she was impregnated by God, and as long as they're above the modernized age of consent this sort of thing's deemed acceptable by the Laws of Man: 

Turncoat that is abhorrent, nowhere does it ever imply anywhere in the holy scriptures that Jesus and Mary Magdalene ever had any sort of sexual or romantic relationship

provide evidence or shut up about it forever because that is disgusting and Jesus would never ever, He is holy and pure and righteous and faithful unlike I was

There's more to support the two of them being a thing than there is Emily + Jesus in the scripture. 

They bother mentioning her at all over the importance she had in his life, and at most he only casts her aside over how he hadn't ascended yet, but even this could simply be over him at that point appearing in a newer form as he looked over his own body. There is otherwise arguably no mortal closer to him than she was, traveling with him after he'd cast seven demons from her with her otherwise referring to him as her Rabboni. 

There's enough symbols in there to suggest the two were married, but considering all the revisions and steering the writing went through I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't want Jesus' union with someone mortal and likely sinful to come to light. It otherwise never explicitly explains him having not been married, which it'd otherwise have likely done when it was common for men of that time to marry, especially those with any sort of power. 

At the end of the day regardless of their time together you'll still have to consolidate what their relationship means in the bigger picture. Why bother mentioning her at all if the two weren't close? 

---

Also as a side note I notice how you didn't call God a Pedophile in spite of your own concerns over similar criteria. 

lol this is the most pathetic "evidence" ever, scriptures stating or implying there was anything romantic or sexual between them or admit defeat  :)

I don't know what else to tell you other than 'it's implied'. Would me linking you passages of the two's adventures together be enough? 

Considering that you're now accepting metaphor about cities as if it's talking about you, I'd say there stands to be far more credibility between Mary and Jesus than Emily and Jesus. Those two were at least people mentioned that stuck together for much of his journey, and they bothered to write her story in their fables by name. 

"adventures together" ? God having female disciples is good and right, that doesn't mean they should be sexual towards him, and nowhere does it ever encourage that in the Holy scriptures, not even I Jesus's significant other and the divine Mother am sexual with God............

There's more to justify in the text those two than your interactions, especially if you're going with having been Lilith and Astarte.  

maybe from your perspective ? Not from mine though, and I've copypasted many many holy scripture textual justifications 

It literally falls one-to-one with the way they write about married pairs, it just lacks the literal text. A lot of card carrying Christians prescribe to this theory (compared to the Emily one). I'd think them not having been married is almost more questionable, and it even fits in line with how God chose a Mary of his own (The Virgin one). 

When they say she'd been possessed by seven demons, and they have an unnamed 'sinful' woman who washed his feet, go figure that they might write those portions out to make things less complicated on the reader, like when they wrote Lilith out of the story after the fact. 

One of the Pope's even interpreted this as meaning she was a prostitute, and it'd make sense with the authors involved that if that were the case that they'd not write about Jesus laying with her or, further, that they had any union at all. Considering how much context you lose if you write her out entirely this is a suitable compromise in their minds.