Sociopath Community

JesusistheKing said: 

this is why Jesus refers to me as a city sometimes in the holy scriptures 

I'm sorry what? 

and yes it probably seems like a joke to you because I'm not a celebrity and I'm ugly, but Jesus was not a celebrity either and was ugly too and most people hated him and made fun of him and mocked him too when He was simply telling the truth that he is God

I mean unlike you it seems like holy people in the Bible can do shit like summon bears unto their foes: 

From there Elisha went up to Bethel. As he was walking along the road, some boys came out of the town and jeered at him. “Get out of here, baldy!” they said. “Get out of here, baldy!” He turned around, looked at them and called down a curse on them in the name of the Lord. Then two bears came out of the woods and mauled forty-two of the boys. - 2 Kings 2:23-25

Kind of hard to deny someone's power when they're literally performing miracles (or sorcery) for people to see. 

Turncoat said: 

JesusistheKing said: 

Turncoat said: 

JesusistheKing said: 

again, I am not making this up. You have to remember that Jesus created females and the family structure and it actually makes way more sense for him to have created a female significant other for himself, than him to not have, it's just that I rebelled just like all of His other made in his image creations did

But Jesus had Mary Magdalene (and it's not wasted on me how both his mother and companion are both named Mary). 

it is really actually simple, and you suggesting that I marry a normal man would actually be pedophilia for me, since I am the divine Mother and Jesus is my actual husband not just like symbolic as in when he calls his wife the church, the church is his wife but I am like the representation of the entire church and his significant other and partner, this is how He has explained it to me

It's not pedophilia unless they're under 18, and this didn't stop God from impregnating a human so why should this stop you? 

The Virgin Mary was 14 when she was impregnated by God, and as long as they're above the modernized age of consent this sort of thing's deemed acceptable by the Laws of Man: 

Turncoat that is abhorrent, nowhere does it ever imply anywhere in the holy scriptures that Jesus and Mary Magdalene ever had any sort of sexual or romantic relationship

 

provide evidence or shut up about it forever because that is disgusting and Jesus would never ever, He is holy and pure and righteous and faithful unlike I was

There's more to support the two of them being a thing than there is Emily + Jesus in the scripture. 

They bother mentioning her at all over the importance she had in his life, and at most he only casts her aside over how he hadn't ascended yet, but even this could simply be over him at that point appearing in a newer form as he looked over his own body. There is otherwise arguably no mortal closer to him than she was, traveling with him after he'd cast seven demons from her with her otherwise referring to him as her Rabboni. 

There's enough symbols in there to suggest the two were married, but considering all the revisions and steering the writing went through I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't want Jesus' union with someone mortal and likely sinful to come to light. It otherwise never explicitly explains him having not been married, which it'd otherwise have likely done when it was common for men of that time to marry, especially those with any sort of power. 

At the end of the day regardless of their time together you'll still have to consolidate what their relationship means in the bigger picture. Why bother mentioning her at all if the two weren't close? 

---

Also as a side note I notice how you didn't call God a Pedophile in spite of your own concerns over similar criteria. 

lol this is the most pathetic "evidence" ever, scriptures stating or implying there was anything romantic or sexual between them or admit defeat  :)

Turncoat said: 

JesusistheKing said: 

this is why Jesus refers to me as a city sometimes in the holy scriptures 

I'm sorry what? 

and yes it probably seems like a joke to you because I'm not a celebrity and I'm ugly, but Jesus was not a celebrity either and was ugly too and most people hated him and made fun of him and mocked him too when He was simply telling the truth that he is God

I mean unlike you it seems like holy people in the Bible can do shit like summon bears unto their foes: 

---

From there Elisha went up to Bethel. As he was walking along the road, some boys came out of the town and jeered at him. “Get out of here, baldy!” they said. “Get out of here, baldy!” He turned around, looked at them and called down a curse on them in the name of the Lord. Then two bears came out of the woods and mauled forty-two of the boys. - 2 Kings 2:23-25

---

Kind of hard to deny someone's power when they're literally performing miracles (or sorcery) for people to see. 

Revelation 17:18

18 And the woman which thou sawest is that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth.

what is not to understand ? he calls me a city because I am a part of everyone and everyone is a part of me

I am literally inside of every single human being influencing them on a subconscious level, that is why I am referred to as "the lady we all know" in the Stairway to Heaven song

God is this too, as well as Satan but Satan is only temporarily until he is condemned to eternal hell

I thought this would be obvious understanding the analogy, I guess not and it probably only makes sense to me because I actually experience it

JesusistheKing said: 

Turncoat said: 

JesusistheKing said: 

Turncoat said: 

JesusistheKing said: 

again, I am not making this up. You have to remember that Jesus created females and the family structure and it actually makes way more sense for him to have created a female significant other for himself, than him to not have, it's just that I rebelled just like all of His other made in his image creations did

But Jesus had Mary Magdalene (and it's not wasted on me how both his mother and companion are both named Mary). 

it is really actually simple, and you suggesting that I marry a normal man would actually be pedophilia for me, since I am the divine Mother and Jesus is my actual husband not just like symbolic as in when he calls his wife the church, the church is his wife but I am like the representation of the entire church and his significant other and partner, this is how He has explained it to me

It's not pedophilia unless they're under 18, and this didn't stop God from impregnating a human so why should this stop you? 

The Virgin Mary was 14 when she was impregnated by God, and as long as they're above the modernized age of consent this sort of thing's deemed acceptable by the Laws of Man: 

Turncoat that is abhorrent, nowhere does it ever imply anywhere in the holy scriptures that Jesus and Mary Magdalene ever had any sort of sexual or romantic relationship

provide evidence or shut up about it forever because that is disgusting and Jesus would never ever, He is holy and pure and righteous and faithful unlike I was

There's more to support the two of them being a thing than there is Emily + Jesus in the scripture. 

They bother mentioning her at all over the importance she had in his life, and at most he only casts her aside over how he hadn't ascended yet, but even this could simply be over him at that point appearing in a newer form as he looked over his own body. There is otherwise arguably no mortal closer to him than she was, traveling with him after he'd cast seven demons from her with her otherwise referring to him as her Rabboni. 

There's enough symbols in there to suggest the two were married, but considering all the revisions and steering the writing went through I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't want Jesus' union with someone mortal and likely sinful to come to light. It otherwise never explicitly explains him having not been married, which it'd otherwise have likely done when it was common for men of that time to marry, especially those with any sort of power. 

At the end of the day regardless of their time together you'll still have to consolidate what their relationship means in the bigger picture. Why bother mentioning her at all if the two weren't close? 

---

Also as a side note I notice how you didn't call God a Pedophile in spite of your own concerns over similar criteria. 

lol this is the most pathetic "evidence" ever, scriptures stating or implying there was anything romantic or sexual between them or admit defeat  :)

I don't know what else to tell you other than 'it's implied'. Would me linking you passages of the two's adventures together be enough? 

Considering that you're now accepting metaphor about cities as if it's talking about you, I'd say there stands to be far more credibility between Mary and Jesus than Emily and Jesus. Those two were at least people mentioned that stuck together for much of his journey, and they bothered to write her story in their fables by name. 

Turncoat said: 

JesusistheKing said: 

Turncoat said: 

JesusistheKing said: 

Turncoat said: 

JesusistheKing said: 

again, I am not making this up. You have to remember that Jesus created females and the family structure and it actually makes way more sense for him to have created a female significant other for himself, than him to not have, it's just that I rebelled just like all of His other made in his image creations did

But Jesus had Mary Magdalene (and it's not wasted on me how both his mother and companion are both named Mary). 

it is really actually simple, and you suggesting that I marry a normal man would actually be pedophilia for me, since I am the divine Mother and Jesus is my actual husband not just like symbolic as in when he calls his wife the church, the church is his wife but I am like the representation of the entire church and his significant other and partner, this is how He has explained it to me

It's not pedophilia unless they're under 18, and this didn't stop God from impregnating a human so why should this stop you? 

The Virgin Mary was 14 when she was impregnated by God, and as long as they're above the modernized age of consent this sort of thing's deemed acceptable by the Laws of Man: 

Turncoat that is abhorrent, nowhere does it ever imply anywhere in the holy scriptures that Jesus and Mary Magdalene ever had any sort of sexual or romantic relationship

provide evidence or shut up about it forever because that is disgusting and Jesus would never ever, He is holy and pure and righteous and faithful unlike I was

There's more to support the two of them being a thing than there is Emily + Jesus in the scripture. 

They bother mentioning her at all over the importance she had in his life, and at most he only casts her aside over how he hadn't ascended yet, but even this could simply be over him at that point appearing in a newer form as he looked over his own body. There is otherwise arguably no mortal closer to him than she was, traveling with him after he'd cast seven demons from her with her otherwise referring to him as her Rabboni. 

There's enough symbols in there to suggest the two were married, but considering all the revisions and steering the writing went through I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't want Jesus' union with someone mortal and likely sinful to come to light. It otherwise never explicitly explains him having not been married, which it'd otherwise have likely done when it was common for men of that time to marry, especially those with any sort of power. 

At the end of the day regardless of their time together you'll still have to consolidate what their relationship means in the bigger picture. Why bother mentioning her at all if the two weren't close? 

---

Also as a side note I notice how you didn't call God a Pedophile in spite of your own concerns over similar criteria. 

lol this is the most pathetic "evidence" ever, scriptures stating or implying there was anything romantic or sexual between them or admit defeat  :)

I don't know what else to tell you other than 'it's implied'. Would me linking you passages of the two's adventures together be enough? 

Considering that you're now accepting metaphor about cities as if it's talking about you, I'd say there stands to be far more credibility between Mary and Jesus than Emily and Jesus. Those two were at least people mentioned that stuck together for much of his journey, and they bothered to write her story in their fables by name. 

 It is not implied hahahahahahahahahahahaha

you are too funny, but seriously seek the truth because it nowhere implies that in the New Testament

Turncoat said: 

JesusistheKing said: 

Turncoat said: 

JesusistheKing said: 

Turncoat said: 

JesusistheKing said: 

again, I am not making this up. You have to remember that Jesus created females and the family structure and it actually makes way more sense for him to have created a female significant other for himself, than him to not have, it's just that I rebelled just like all of His other made in his image creations did

But Jesus had Mary Magdalene (and it's not wasted on me how both his mother and companion are both named Mary). 

it is really actually simple, and you suggesting that I marry a normal man would actually be pedophilia for me, since I am the divine Mother and Jesus is my actual husband not just like symbolic as in when he calls his wife the church, the church is his wife but I am like the representation of the entire church and his significant other and partner, this is how He has explained it to me

It's not pedophilia unless they're under 18, and this didn't stop God from impregnating a human so why should this stop you? 

The Virgin Mary was 14 when she was impregnated by God, and as long as they're above the modernized age of consent this sort of thing's deemed acceptable by the Laws of Man: 

Turncoat that is abhorrent, nowhere does it ever imply anywhere in the holy scriptures that Jesus and Mary Magdalene ever had any sort of sexual or romantic relationship

provide evidence or shut up about it forever because that is disgusting and Jesus would never ever, He is holy and pure and righteous and faithful unlike I was

There's more to support the two of them being a thing than there is Emily + Jesus in the scripture. 

They bother mentioning her at all over the importance she had in his life, and at most he only casts her aside over how he hadn't ascended yet, but even this could simply be over him at that point appearing in a newer form as he looked over his own body. There is otherwise arguably no mortal closer to him than she was, traveling with him after he'd cast seven demons from her with her otherwise referring to him as her Rabboni. 

There's enough symbols in there to suggest the two were married, but considering all the revisions and steering the writing went through I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't want Jesus' union with someone mortal and likely sinful to come to light. It otherwise never explicitly explains him having not been married, which it'd otherwise have likely done when it was common for men of that time to marry, especially those with any sort of power. 

At the end of the day regardless of their time together you'll still have to consolidate what their relationship means in the bigger picture. Why bother mentioning her at all if the two weren't close? 

---

Also as a side note I notice how you didn't call God a Pedophile in spite of your own concerns over similar criteria. 

lol this is the most pathetic "evidence" ever, scriptures stating or implying there was anything romantic or sexual between them or admit defeat  :)

I don't know what else to tell you other than 'it's implied'. Would me linking you passages of the two's adventures together be enough? 

Considering that you're now accepting metaphor about cities as if it's talking about you, I'd say there stands to be far more credibility between Mary and Jesus than Emily and Jesus. Those two were at least people mentioned that stuck together for much of his journey, and they bothered to write her story in their fables by name. 

"adventures together" ? God having female disciples is good and right, that doesn't mean they should be sexual towards him, and nowhere does it ever encourage that in the Holy scriptures, not even I Jesus's significant other and the divine Mother am sexual with God............

I wish lol, that would solve all of my current various sexual addiction (none physically I real life anymore thank goodness) problems

I genuinely would LOVE to make love to Jesus spiritually, that would make me so incredibly happy, but I would be scared it would be Satan impersonating him because as far as I know in eternal life we won't be sexual with each other

but maybe I'll just start masturbating and thinking of Jesus only to help with my sexual addiction issues

JesusistheKing said: 

Turncoat said: 

JesusistheKing said: 

Turncoat said: 

JesusistheKing said: 

Turncoat said: 

JesusistheKing said: 

again, I am not making this up. You have to remember that Jesus created females and the family structure and it actually makes way more sense for him to have created a female significant other for himself, than him to not have, it's just that I rebelled just like all of His other made in his image creations did

But Jesus had Mary Magdalene (and it's not wasted on me how both his mother and companion are both named Mary). 

it is really actually simple, and you suggesting that I marry a normal man would actually be pedophilia for me, since I am the divine Mother and Jesus is my actual husband not just like symbolic as in when he calls his wife the church, the church is his wife but I am like the representation of the entire church and his significant other and partner, this is how He has explained it to me

It's not pedophilia unless they're under 18, and this didn't stop God from impregnating a human so why should this stop you? 

The Virgin Mary was 14 when she was impregnated by God, and as long as they're above the modernized age of consent this sort of thing's deemed acceptable by the Laws of Man: 

Turncoat that is abhorrent, nowhere does it ever imply anywhere in the holy scriptures that Jesus and Mary Magdalene ever had any sort of sexual or romantic relationship

provide evidence or shut up about it forever because that is disgusting and Jesus would never ever, He is holy and pure and righteous and faithful unlike I was

There's more to support the two of them being a thing than there is Emily + Jesus in the scripture. 

They bother mentioning her at all over the importance she had in his life, and at most he only casts her aside over how he hadn't ascended yet, but even this could simply be over him at that point appearing in a newer form as he looked over his own body. There is otherwise arguably no mortal closer to him than she was, traveling with him after he'd cast seven demons from her with her otherwise referring to him as her Rabboni. 

There's enough symbols in there to suggest the two were married, but considering all the revisions and steering the writing went through I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't want Jesus' union with someone mortal and likely sinful to come to light. It otherwise never explicitly explains him having not been married, which it'd otherwise have likely done when it was common for men of that time to marry, especially those with any sort of power. 

At the end of the day regardless of their time together you'll still have to consolidate what their relationship means in the bigger picture. Why bother mentioning her at all if the two weren't close? 

---

Also as a side note I notice how you didn't call God a Pedophile in spite of your own concerns over similar criteria. 

lol this is the most pathetic "evidence" ever, scriptures stating or implying there was anything romantic or sexual between them or admit defeat  :)

I don't know what else to tell you other than 'it's implied'. Would me linking you passages of the two's adventures together be enough? 

Considering that you're now accepting metaphor about cities as if it's talking about you, I'd say there stands to be far more credibility between Mary and Jesus than Emily and Jesus. Those two were at least people mentioned that stuck together for much of his journey, and they bothered to write her story in their fables by name. 

"adventures together" ? God having female disciples is good and right, that doesn't mean they should be sexual towards him, and nowhere does it ever encourage that in the Holy scriptures, not even I Jesus's significant other and the divine Mother am sexual with God............

There's more to justify in the text those two than your interactions, especially if you're going with having been Lilith and Astarte. 

Revelation 17:18

18 And the woman which thou sawest is that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth.



what is not to understand ? he calls me a city because I am a part of everyone and everyone is a part of me



I am literally inside of every single human being influencing them on a subconscious level, that is why I am referred to as "the lady we all know" in the Stairway to Heaven song



God is this too, as well as Satan but Satan is only temporarily until he is condemned to eternal hell



I thought this would be obvious understanding the analogy, I guess not and it probably only makes sense to me because I actually experience it

(I am reposting this because when I posted it above it had a lot of typos)

Turncoat said: 

JesusistheKing said: 

Turncoat said: 

JesusistheKing said: 

Turncoat said: 

JesusistheKing said: 

Turncoat said: 

JesusistheKing said: 

again, I am not making this up. You have to remember that Jesus created females and the family structure and it actually makes way more sense for him to have created a female significant other for himself, than him to not have, it's just that I rebelled just like all of His other made in his image creations did

But Jesus had Mary Magdalene (and it's not wasted on me how both his mother and companion are both named Mary). 

it is really actually simple, and you suggesting that I marry a normal man would actually be pedophilia for me, since I am the divine Mother and Jesus is my actual husband not just like symbolic as in when he calls his wife the church, the church is his wife but I am like the representation of the entire church and his significant other and partner, this is how He has explained it to me

It's not pedophilia unless they're under 18, and this didn't stop God from impregnating a human so why should this stop you? 

The Virgin Mary was 14 when she was impregnated by God, and as long as they're above the modernized age of consent this sort of thing's deemed acceptable by the Laws of Man: 

Turncoat that is abhorrent, nowhere does it ever imply anywhere in the holy scriptures that Jesus and Mary Magdalene ever had any sort of sexual or romantic relationship

provide evidence or shut up about it forever because that is disgusting and Jesus would never ever, He is holy and pure and righteous and faithful unlike I was

There's more to support the two of them being a thing than there is Emily + Jesus in the scripture. 

They bother mentioning her at all over the importance she had in his life, and at most he only casts her aside over how he hadn't ascended yet, but even this could simply be over him at that point appearing in a newer form as he looked over his own body. There is otherwise arguably no mortal closer to him than she was, traveling with him after he'd cast seven demons from her with her otherwise referring to him as her Rabboni. 

There's enough symbols in there to suggest the two were married, but considering all the revisions and steering the writing went through I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't want Jesus' union with someone mortal and likely sinful to come to light. It otherwise never explicitly explains him having not been married, which it'd otherwise have likely done when it was common for men of that time to marry, especially those with any sort of power. 

At the end of the day regardless of their time together you'll still have to consolidate what their relationship means in the bigger picture. Why bother mentioning her at all if the two weren't close? 

---

Also as a side note I notice how you didn't call God a Pedophile in spite of your own concerns over similar criteria. 

lol this is the most pathetic "evidence" ever, scriptures stating or implying there was anything romantic or sexual between them or admit defeat  :)

I don't know what else to tell you other than 'it's implied'. Would me linking you passages of the two's adventures together be enough? 

Considering that you're now accepting metaphor about cities as if it's talking about you, I'd say there stands to be far more credibility between Mary and Jesus than Emily and Jesus. Those two were at least people mentioned that stuck together for much of his journey, and they bothered to write her story in their fables by name. 

"adventures together" ? God having female disciples is good and right, that doesn't mean they should be sexual towards him, and nowhere does it ever encourage that in the Holy scriptures, not even I Jesus's significant other and the divine Mother am sexual with God............

There's more to justify in the text those two than your interactions, especially if you're going with having been Lilith and Astarte. 

 

maybe from your perspective ? Not from mine though, and I've copypasted many many holy scripture textual justifications