Sociopath Community

"victory" when did this become a competition to you?

i don't debate mentally challenged people, i speak if they listen they listen

if they don't? well.. 

AizenTheTitanic said: 

"victory" when did this become a competition to you?

 

i don't debate mentally challenged people, i speak if they listen they listen

if they don't? well.. 

 You debate with yourself all the time though.

Asexuality is straight up a blindspot, they don't feel the urge and they don't seem to understand the dynamics that occur naturally even in the pining failures. 

It's got to be so different to not have that be a distraction. 

Chapo said: 

AizenTheTitanic said: 

being too repulsive to get sex is too rare given how this is a society of desperate "simps"

there are extremely beautiful women who turn to asexuality to increase their self esteem by convincing themselves they are "unattainable" or "different from the rest of the hoes"

 They aren’t asexual though. They’re all sluts.

They're all sluts? 

Elaborate? 

they don't feel the urge... sounds a bit biochemically impossible unless you take the world literally

most people who use it don't belong to such category

AizenTheTitanic said: 

they don't feel the urge... sounds a bit biochemically impossible unless you take the world literally

Just like how someone can be born with their attraction senses mixed up towards the other gender, or the capacity to be attracted to both (if not full blown pansexuality), so too can they not have the natural wiring that leads to sexual inclinations. In some I'd imagine that energy being sublimated into other urges, but in the legitimate cases I've seen they always look a bit more passive than other people, a little tired, and when the situation would invite rubber necking or some shit they show no signs of budging. 

Sapiosexuality, the attraction to the mind over the body, shows significantly more responses to people than legitimate asexuals. As another note I've never met a legit asexual who faced sexual abuse, and they did not display aversions or disturbances against the activity but rather confusion. Some of them can end up in sexual encounters from that being 'What is normal' but they always report no sense of pleasure and they don't seem to have a sense of sexual aestheticism when it comes to picking mates. 

I don't see why the idea of an asexual is so aberrant, you can legitimately destroy someone's sex drives with chemicals so why couldn't someone just have that as a form of social retardation? 

most people who use it don't belong to such category

This I'm prone to agree with. 

any source that makes sense besides CNN BCC suggestions and shaman talks about all this?

or at least a theory that's not based on sheer absurdism and lack of common sense?

I can find some if you really need them, but this has been mostly anecdotal from personal experience with some as a side-symptom of other disorders (like aspergers) and from my old Abnormal Psych classes (and somewhat my Sexual Psych class). 

It's just such a straight forward disorder, their body language is a dead giveaway. If it were an aversion rather than an absence they'd show some sort of microexpression like a mild cringe or something. Our levels of attraction to people between people isn't 1-to-1, they don't all feel the same level of attraction when they see someone ranging from muted to lack of inhibition intensity, so what makes the notion of it's absence so strange? 

It's seriously like they just don't see it, don't model off of it from media cues, it's just not a thing to them to the point that they tend to not even feel the need to talk about it. 

all this would be plausible as a theory, with the psychological terms or not, simply as an abstract if-

all these people were capable of "mind" in other words an active consciousness

an active consciousness is extremely rare, therefore the entire theory is grounded on a big assumption that has relatively unrealistic standards

the biochemical part makes perfect sense but even that is up to a point per se

bit more passive/ kill sex drive with chemicals/ passive body language/ it's understandable that intensity and assertion are based on sex hormones, but which ones? what rates? what interactions with sleep food?

and is the rare aforementioned consciousness present? if yes how come they are completely in denial about it?

you claim that it's attraction to the "mind" over the body" but the mind isn't observable, only what it produces is

sounds, visionary input, impressions these are all based on the subconscious reactions (law of attraction)