Sociopath Community

AizenTheTitanic said: 

Are you doing okay? I literally tried to understand your reasoning but you stopped making sense. 

Where'd I lose you? 

AizenTheTitanic said: 

I'm the type of person who wants to be admired and cherished constantly without admiring or cherising anything.

And at the same time, I love watching women attached to me while I know I will never be attached to them.

I'm fully aware that's narcissistic as they come, yet I can't stop. It's addictive.

 

lie

It's not a lie, I can't get attached to women anymore. And the more confident I become the more easily detached/cold I get.

AizenTheTitanic said: 

It's not a lie, I can't get attached to women anymore. 

More like you're too scared of attachment to get close enough yourself. 

Turncoat said: 

AizenTheTitanic said: 

It's not a lie, I can't get attached to women anymore. 

More like you're too scared of attachment to get close enough yourself. 

 What do you think frightens him about attachment?  I assume you mean he’s afraid of getting attached (to whomever).  (He did specify women.  Do you think he still allows himself to get attached to men?)

You're incapable of relating to my inability to attach because given your own personal limitations as beings you're unable to see and feel things the way I do.

You think I care enough to front some sort of cyber persona here of an ASPD dark lord, and to look down on "connections attachments" to avoid showing weakness or whatever.

I'm not you and frankly speaking I don't care enough to do that, I already defeated you all in your own game so now this site is my notebook.

I see what you do here constantly, personal, personal, personal, drama. 

Of the most boring people alive, old women, pedophiles, incels, schizophrenics, psychotics. Ugly, poor, uneducated, graceless people. BPD's, NPD's, ASPD's, autists, all these are boring deficiencies, so is natasha x tranny coat, battered toast x chapo, or whatever.

Meanwhile I'm always striving to look from the top, a bird's eye view. A third point of view perspective. A perspective from a higher mental position than yours.

Mind you, this isn't a self-assesment, I test it. In real life, I challenge people, dangerous people, violent people, narcissistic people. And see how much I can prevail.

I pinpoint my deficiencies, and I immediately self-admit them and deal with them, then I test again and again and again.

That's my objective and pragmatic view. And it's based on cause, effect, result. Not "this makes me feel this way or you make me feel this way"

My view has a science, chaotic sure, blunt sometimes, but science nonetheless.

And that view tells me that there's no woman, man, person, or <<personality>> that's more worthwhile than my ideals.

If you can't understand that and you think I'm fronting out of fear to be attached or hurt or whatever, well that's your own problem.

Keep projecting.

Buttered Toast said: 

Turncoat said: 

AizenTheTitanic said: 

It's not a lie, I can't get attached to women anymore. 

More like you're too scared of attachment to get close enough yourself. 

 What do you think frightens him about attachment?  I assume you mean he’s afraid of getting attached (to whomever).  (He did specify women.  Do you think he still allows himself to get attached to men?)

Vulnerability is what he craves, but it's also what he fears the most. Attachment means he can stand to blame himself for the things they go through, so he thinks he'd rather do without it in spite of the contrast he makes by reaching out to others to let them know about it. 

Letting someone in means they can hurt him, which is why he constantly asserts that he can't let that happen. 

AizenTheTitanic said: 

You're incapable of relating to my inability to attach because given your own personal limitations as beings you're unable to see and feel things the way I do.

You sound like you've formerly formed attachments though. That capacity doesn't just go away, it's either there or it isn't. 

You think I care enough to front some sort of cyber persona here of an ASPD dark lord, and to look down on "connections attachments" to avoid showing weakness or whatever.

You've specifically explained to us that you tell yourself the preferred way you'd rather see yourself over and over until it's 'the reality', using avatars as effigies to the concepts you wish to adopt. You tailor your sense of self more than most people here try to, and you even explain that to people as if it were practical life advice, and even have said that you've had to do this from having a fragile sense of self-identity that fails to introspect without a comparative model. 

It was your entire Juggernaut shtick. 

I'm not you and frankly speaking I don't care enough to do that, I already defeated you all in your own game so now this site is my notebook.

I see what you do here constantly, personal, personal, personal, drama. 

Of the most boring people alive, old women, pedophiles, incels, schizophrenics, psychotics. Ugly, poor, uneducated, graceless people. BPD's, NPD's, ASPD's, autists, all these are boring deficiencies, so is natasha x tranny coat, battered toast x chapo, or whatever.

I've definitely met more boring people than this den of dark triad traits. 

Meanwhile I'm always striving to look from the top, a bird's eye view. A third point of view perspective. A perspective from a higher mental position than yours.

'The Top' is a relative perspective based around one's own personal values. When it comes to the climb, the only one you need to please is yourself. 

To say you're higher up than anyone else is is to act like we're all striving for your values and goals. 

Mind you, this isn't a self-assesment, I test it. In real life, I challenge people, dangerous people, violent people, narcissistic people. And see how much I can prevail. 

Why though? What do you get out of these challenges that you couldn't just find within yourself? 

I pinpoint my deficiencies, and I immediately self-admit them and deal with them, then I test again and again and again.

Seeing it's the challenge though. 

 

Keep projecting.

It's all any of us can do. 

Two huge mistakes with this^ :

Everyone can attach to something, even psychopaths or machiavellians. The capacity is always there just specified to different things. You see people, I see value, a psychopath sees usages, a machiavellian opportunities.

Same thing, dependency/ attachment to something

Psychiatry just romanticized and dehumanized the concept of dark triad personalities, for no reason but the discomfort they bring to society. In my eyes, I always saw people as tools to strike MY deficiencies, and depends on how good they were at it, the more I would feed with approval/attention

When that's run out so they are, if you want to cool that attachment? Sure, cope. 

I don't care if you don't care about my values or goals cause they're objectively the best, if you can't see it you're a lemming.

Challenges can only be external, there's no internal challenge unless you're mentally handicapped.

AizenTheTitanic said: 

Everyone can attach to something, even psychopaths or machiavellians. The capacity is always there just specified to different things. You see people, I see value, a psychopath sees usages, a machiavellian opportunities.

It's not the same sense of attachment from those deficient in that capacity. Like you say above, psychos see uses, and those uses aren't really attachments in that they view those uses as immediately replaceable to the point of getting less out of them in the first place. 

It's like how I see uses out of my couch; It's a nice couch, but if it was too fucked up it could be replaced. Attachment's where the sentimentality and guilt kicks in, while uses is more like possessions at best. 

Psychiatry just romanticized and dehumanized the concept of dark triad personalities, for no reason but the discomfort they bring to society. 

'Dark Triad' does have a way of sounding like 'a bad thing', I'm not surprised they'd try to relabel it. 

In my eyes, I always saw people as tools to strike MY deficiencies, and depends on how good they were at it, the more I would feed with approval/attention.

When that's run out so they are, if you want to cool that attachment? Sure, cope. 

With how much reinforcement it takes you it seems from here like you're trying to avoid seeing people as people, rather than lacking the means of doing it. 

There's a certain blunt affect to people who just don't see it naturally, but you try too hard to not be seeing it at all. Your views of it are likely just weirdly twisted by your perceptions and experiences rather than something that's just absent from you, as those without the perception tend to not have it as a notable hang up, even when it's to their detriment. 

I don't care if you don't care about my values or goals cause they're objectively the best, if you can't see it you're a lemming.

I'm sure you see the problem with the presumption that those who don't see it must belong to 'the other camp', that's just self-reinforcement when they're otherwise not used to receiving support for their views, a coping mechanism. 

Challenges can only be external, there's no internal challenge unless you're mentally handicapped.

Strongly disagree, what would be the point of philosophers and monks and shit if this were true?