Sociopath Community

Spatial Mind said: 

QuietBeef said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

emilynghiem said: 

I read an article a long time ago, describing reseaech showing that women were more attracted to men for their minds and intelligence, but it was their looks that got passed down. While men were more attracted and selected women as partners based on their looks, but it was their intelligence that got passed down.

True to a degree. It takes time to express charisma. It'll happen under the right climate.

I watched a video where a guy went undercover on a dating app. He catfished as a stud and as it turned out he was sexually harassed and was collecting coutless numbers from women who made it clear they will fuck right away.

Dating apps are not for dating.  Dating apps are for fucking.

More often we see women seeking a genuine long term relationship on dating apps.

What dating apps are you using, some sort of Christian Singles service? 

Dating app are clearly streamlined for fucking. 

So if men pick better looking women, and compromise on intelligence, the population pool could be getting dumber if men aren't selecting the smartest women for procreation if they are more concerned with physical looks.

While men could be getting less attractive if women are compromising on looks, by going for intelligence and other personality traits as the determining factor, while the physical appearance deemed less critical is what is passing down and dominating the gene pool. 

 As for intelligence. lol. Guys in general think they are smarter than women, and we don't exactly look forward to being the sidekick.

A lot of men prefer a secondary role.  They're told they're not supposed to.

What role might that be?

From what I've gathered, women are happier when they are submissive, hence them being submissive in a functioning relationship.

Funny, I've seen women as more of a spectrum of desires than one uniform template, and as society allows them more autonomy less of them are reflecting a submissive model. 

Thank goodness for the modern age. 

I think our species populating is going to slow down, while men are being emasculated and women gradually resent their traditional and natural roles in a healthy loving family setting. 

 If it's so healthy, why would we resent it? lol

Technological advances and movements through social media has made women more self absorbed.

Just women in particular? To me it's seemed fairly unisex as a byproduct of tech's contribution towards social insulation in conjunction with media that asks us 'who we are' instead of 'what we're a part of'. 

Then they long for the glory of overtaking men not only in the workspace, but also in God given power.

That's just the 'out of the closet' mindset that's surfaced as a counter-response against their former states of repression. Once female autonomy is more normalized it won't seem like some sort of glorious undertaking. Unfortunately. 

For the modern woman, the agenda in the grand scheme of them is more about Career> Politics> but not so much Family.

They fight for family rights in the form of women's rights, such as the right to contraceptives and equal pay in the workplace. 

Both of these things contribute to family planning in more mature and constructive ways than some guy using a woman as an indentured servant. 

These days Women who want families, plan to start one later on in life when they are less fertile and at the edge of the clock, and then life seems more miserable.

If they're smart, they save their eggs to preserve the quality of the child, reducing the odds of birth defects by comparison. 

If she scored someone more wealthy than she is, and if he's as you might say "secondary role" she will at some point file for divorce, take half of his net worth and slap him with child support, and most of that money by a landslide doesn't go to the child, it goes into her Jenny Craig programs and shopping and other cosmetic ventures so she can bang some other guy.

It's like you're stuck before prenuptial agreements became more commonplace. 

But yeah, traditional family settings produce healthier minds and lifestyles, you did know that right ?

I'd love to be able to have a real conversation with someone about this, rather than them pussing out from thinking some leftist flash mob's out to get them. 

This era's made men into such cowards when it comes to speaking their mind. 

Turncoat said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

QuietBeef said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

 

What dating apps are you using, some sort of Christian Singles service? 

Dating app are clearly streamlined for fucking. 

In Dating apps is rare to see a woman that just wants to just fuck. Unless they are a porn star, most women have a problem putting their face online asking to get laid.

What role might that be?

From what I've gathered, women are happier when they are submissive, hence them being submissive in a functioning relationship.

Funny, I've seen women as more of a spectrum of desires than one uniform template, and as society allows them more autonomy less of them are reflecting a submissive model. 

Thank goodness for the modern age. 

That doesn't change the fact women, sorry, straight women are happier when they are submissive to a man.

For example, if Quietbeef is submissive to another guy, you'll get cucked or left behind. If she's not submissive to you, then things aren't as stable as you'd think.

I think our species populating is going to slow down, while men are being emasculated and women gradually resent their traditional and natural roles in a healthy loving family setting. 

 If it's so healthy, why would we resent it? lol

Technological advances and movements through social media has made women more self absorbed.

Just women in particular? To me it's seemed fairly unisex as a byproduct of tech's contribution towards social insulation in conjunction with media that asks us 'who we are' instead of 'what we're a part of'. 

Breaking sentences off my paragraphs and spinning it off foolishly.

In the same clusterfuck above I said men are being emasculated, so no not just women in particular, but I believe she asked why would women resent traditional roles. I will punish you. 

Then they long for the glory of overtaking men not only in the workspace, but also in God given power.

That's just the 'out of the closet' mindset that's surfaced as a counter-response against their former states of repression. Once female autonomy is more normalized it won't seem like some sort of glorious undertaking. Unfortunately. 

What makes you think female autonomy isn't normalized already ?

The most privileged human beings in the world are western women. Their problem is that they worry about what other women are doing with their lives, things they themselves aren't doing. "More women need to do this and that" 

 

For the modern woman, the agenda in the grand scheme of them is more about Career> Politics> but not so much Family.

They fight for family rights in the form of women's rights, such as the right to contraceptives and equal pay in the workplace. 

Gender pay gap is bullshit. Successful women shake their heads at this.

This place I used to work. A massive factory, I performed miracles, making the company 250k a month ( Just me alone in my department) I had packing coming to me saying wtf slow down while the floor manager pushed me way too hard, and every woman that work for that company made more money then I did in their cozy offices.

As we're in a pandemic some friends that still work there got a job for a lady friend of mine, and while she's being trained, she's making more money than I ever did when I was there. I had engineers praising me wanting me to work with them as they liked my CG demo and they actually changed some things in the service manual because of me, because of that, I was the only one in the entire plant that was able to do every single task that company had to offer from the lowest to highest paying position.

When I was in college for CG, out of 15 students in my class we had TWO females. The class before us had 2 females and the class after us had 1. The point I'm making is, the reason why certain high paying jobs are male dominated, is because mostly men apply for those jobs while most women have no interest in doing them. One of the females in my class got hired right away and up to this day I never made as much as she did in this field. That and my final project mashed everyone else's. 

When you see women working in the high paying jobs, they DO NOT complain about gender pay gap. The ones who do complain about gender pay gap have shitty paying jobs to begin with.

And Womens NBA pay gap ? HA HA HA. If they had a larger audience and sold merchandise then they would surely make more, yet, there are guys in professional sports that don't make that much money, they are the ones who keep the bench warm.

Both of these things contribute to family planning in more mature and constructive ways than some guy using a woman as an indentured servant. 

That's part of the problem. Like it's not okay for a woman to serve her man at all these days. Now it's a huge deal to prepare a meal for a guy.

In a functional relationship, both parties are of service to one another. Men and women really don't want a useless partner.

If the man stays home then let him cook and clean. If he doesn't then too bad for the woman, and vice versa. A good partner will also cook and clean. 

Like damn. A man is working hard all day and he comes home hungry and tired to a mess and a miserable woman who does nothing cause it would make her feel like an underprivileged servant, LoL. I had one of those. Next.

These days Women who want families, plan to start one later on in life when they are less fertile and at the edge of the clock, and then life seems more miserable.

If they're smart, they save their eggs to preserve the quality of the child, reducing the odds of birth defects by comparison. 

What are you saying there ? Most women do not preserve their eggs. But no, it's not happening in the grand scheme.

You're preaching to the quire. Prenuptial agreements aren't even enough to guard one's wealth in the event our spouse monkey branches onto another relationship, and tries to rip us in half in the process.

In my opinion, the willingness to sign a prenup no problem is a better sign of worthiness. Other than that, never let your mate/date/GF what have you, know how much you really have. 

Spatial Mind said: 

Turncoat said: 

What dating apps are you using, some sort of Christian Singles service? 

Dating app are clearly streamlined for fucking. 

In Dating apps is rare to see a woman that just wants to just fuck. Unless they are a porn star, most women have a problem putting their face online asking to get laid.

You sound like someone who has never used one. 

That Tinder pussy's been pretty primo for those who know the system, you ought to consider it to fix the years it's been since you got your dick wet. 

What role might that be?

From what I've gathered, women are happier when they are submissive, hence them being submissive in a functioning relationship.

Funny, I've seen women as more of a spectrum of desires than one uniform template, and as society allows them more autonomy less of them are reflecting a submissive model. 

Thank goodness for the modern age. 

That doesn't change the fact women, sorry, straight women are happier when they are submissive to a man.

It doesn't? Funny, as even logging onto websites like 4chan and 8kun are more lamenting the changes being applied to the 'natural order', unlike you who seems to be denying it outright. That means you're even more behind the times than the Alt-Right, how novel. 

How is a stronger woman by merits of their strength alone not straight anyway? Is this some kind of jab at bisexuality? 

For example, if Quietbeef is submissive to another guy, you'll get cucked or left behind. If she's not submissive to you, then things aren't as stable as you'd think.

Why would she be submissive to another guy's the question? That wouldn't come naturally for her nor other strong women. To presume that all women need leadership like this is less accurate, it is people who need leadership more often than not, but among them are the few who aren't built to be led. 

More likely, you're using 'the role of men' and 'the role of women' to comfort your own weaknesses by applying said values onto the world as a whole. Doing as such, you don't have to work on improving yourself, no, you can instead just sit there and bitch about how the world's not catering to you nor the natural order and it's not your fault. 

You'll be forever alone if you don't adapt, and that adaptation will take you giving your weaknesses and hangups here a serious undertaking. Even Jim's doing better than you with women at this point, and that's saying something. 

I think our species populating is going to slow down, while men are being emasculated and women gradually resent their traditional and natural roles in a healthy loving family setting. 

 If it's so healthy, why would we resent it? lol

Technological advances and movements through social media has made women more self absorbed.

Just women in particular? To me it's seemed fairly unisex as a byproduct of tech's contribution towards social insulation in conjunction with media that asks us 'who we are' instead of 'what we're a part of'. 

Breaking sentences off my paragraphs and spinning it off foolishly.

In the same clusterfuck above I said men are being emasculated, so no not just women in particular, but I believe she asked why would women resent traditional roles. I will punish you. 

If it's not just women, then how is male emasculation (lol you're so weak if you're calling it that and projecting it onto all of 'straight men') a sign of men becoming more self-absorbed? Are you saying that men as they become more self-directed become weaker cucks? 

I don't imagine that this what I just typed above is what you meant, meaning my question still stands unanswered. If I put the entire thing back together, I'd still be asking the same questions. I splinter it off like this for your convenience as context, but my question still stands. 

So I ask again: 'Just women in particular?'. 

Then they long for the glory of overtaking men not only in the workspace, but also in God given power.

That's just the 'out of the closet' mindset that's surfaced as a counter-response against their former states of repression. Once female autonomy is more normalized it won't seem like some sort of glorious undertaking. Unfortunately. 

What makes you think female autonomy isn't normalized already ?

The fact that it's still shifting and that women don't have equal rights in society to men, and that even as the US pushes towards such rights that said rights are not treated as unalienable across the world. 

While The US is basically the insidious media epicenter of the world, capable of spreading it's influence to other countries through their music and television as well as their websites and merch, that does not mean that as goes the US, so does the world (yet at least). Even within the US however there's still more battles that women must win, such as how far back Trump set us for contraceptive rights. 

The most privileged human beings in the world are western women. Their problem is that they worry about what other women are doing with their lives, things they themselves aren't doing. "More women need to do this and that" 

You'd condense the entirety of the female struggle onto some judgy thots corrective words towards each other? 

This has nothing to do with their rights, but rather an over-generalization on their behaviors. 

For the modern woman, the agenda in the grand scheme of them is more about Career> Politics> but not so much Family.

They fight for family rights in the form of women's rights, such as the right to contraceptives and equal pay in the workplace. 

Gender pay gap is bullshit. Successful women shake their heads at this.

That's like denying the differences between the races when it comes to pay and opportunity, but as an 'emasculated man' I can see why you'd act like women are powerful. Most people who are successful lack the means of relating to their ingroup struggles, like Bill Cosby. They use the divide between their own success and the lack of success among their own people to justify how much better they are than them typically, as seen within the smug microexpressions  (if not full blown expressions) that display when asked about it. It's like this art teacher I once had who was always good at working with clay; He couldn't understand why other people couldn't just do it as well as he could, as quickly as he could, and judged accordingly. 

What makes it strange is your insistence over them not really being stronger than you through alluding 'the natural order', even denying that strong women with independent autonomy can be straight like the guy shot down repeatedly that you are. Somehow you claim to be weaker than women yet stronger than them at the same time, it's quite the contradiction. 

Seriously, what percentage of women 'are straight' by your criteria? Do women who've experimented at college surrender their straight cards? 

This place I used to work. A massive factory, I performed miracles, making the company 250k a month ( Just me alone in my department) I had packing coming to me saying wtf slow down while the floor manager pushed me way too hard, and every woman that work for that company made more money then I did in their cozy offices.

They earned it by working that much harder than you'd ever know, you being a privileged male westerner. Pointing at tokenized exceptions anecdotally serves to ignore sociological statistics. I can sit here and give you examples of females who aren't doing as well as men while otherwise doing more work than them, but you'd be in your right to say I'm using anecdotal evidence as well (unless I'm merely arguing them as a matter of relativity or to show that they exist at all). 

I also am not too privy on Canadian gender values, and the views of the Canadians on this forum aren't quite uniform enough to demonstrate anything otherwise. 

As we're in a pandemic some friends that still work there got a job for a lady friend of mine, and while she's being trained, she's making more money than I ever did when I was there.

So you're just going to ignore how COVID is impacting this? 

This is like saying women had equal rights during WW2, or that scabs being paid more than the workers they're replacing accurately reflects that business' practices. 

I had engineers praising me wanting me to work with them as they liked my CG demo and they actually changed some things in the service manual because of me, because of that, I was the only one in the entire plant that was able to do every single task that company had to offer from the lowest to highest paying position.

This doesn't have to do with your gender, nor your talent. 

You're a worker monkey to those people, they knew they could squeeze this out of you from you having too weak a spine to stand your ground or pull in union assistance. 

By contrast I'd gotten raises at my jobs if not privileges back when I still worked for standing my ground. It pays to work smarter, not harder, and I'm sure how cheap you're willing to work while wearing multiple hats (an expression in the workplace that means to do multiple people's jobs) for cuck wages has made your bosses very happy. 

Lol at watching you try to turn people taking advantage of you into patting yourself on the back, you're such a stooge. 

When I was in college for CG, out of 15 students in my class we had TWO females. The class before us had 2 females and the class after us had 1. 

Why were there only 15 students? This on it's own already makes it highly unusual. Also what is CG? 

It was around 50 years ago that men held 58% of the gender ratio in colleges, while now they're 44%. My college seems to have had a pretty even spread of genders overall, but it felt like there were more women than men in most of my classes. 

Women are smarter, they're by design more inclined towards studies while testosterone renders men into neanderthals ideal for construction and battle. It's no mystery why colleges are becoming female-dominated now that society is that much closer to being about equal opportunity. 

The point I'm making is, the reason why certain high paying jobs are male dominated, is because mostly men apply for those jobs while most women have no interest in doing them. One of the females in my class got hired right away and up to this day I never made as much as she did in this field. That and my final project mashed everyone else's. 

This is a load of bullshit, they apply and are from older men less likely to get the job. 

The best solution's closer to waiting for all the old farts to die out so that old money ends up in newer people's hands. With newer people at the helm, the odds of progressive practices goes up significantly by comparison to models loosely based off the 50s and 80s. 

When you see women working in the high paying jobs, they DO NOT complain about gender pay gap. The ones who do complain about gender pay gap have shitty paying jobs to begin with.

Also a load of bullshit, even ignoring the 'Art Teacher' example I gave to illustrate that error with it. 

I've seen women who've succeeded banding together with other women to ensure others get better treatment as well. They're much of why there's any shifting going on at all within the workplace, and even those with a portfolio better than the next man tend to be picked less often, and that grants a sort of classless solidarity when even the most qualified woman can be turned down for some masculine shmuck. 

Seen it more than enough times in my lifetime, and heard about it significantly more. 

And Womens NBA pay gap ? HA HA HA. If they had a larger audience and sold merchandise then they would surely make more, yet, there are guys in professional sports that don't make that much money, they are the ones who keep the bench warm.

Sports is an entirely different can of worms to open. If we're going there, it's going to tangent into entirely unrelated subject matter over sports profit and practice. 

It's kind of crazy how much drama stadiums can cause for one's government and society, but I guess that's where one sublimates wartime urges. 

That's part of the problem. Like it's not okay for a woman to serve her man at all these days. Now it's a huge deal to prepare a meal for a guy.

Just learn to cook, damn. I've seen plenty of households have the man being 'the chef', it's not like women are just born with more of an understanding of cooking (beyond having a superior sense of smell relative to men). 

In a functional relationship, both parties are of service to one another. Men and women really don't want a useless partner. If the man stays home then let him cook and clean. If he doesn't then too bad for the woman, and vice versa. A good partner will also cook and clean. 

Exactly, it's about synergy. As you say applies too when the mother does the heavy lifting and the father's the homemaker, or if two men and two women couple up. Who 'wears the pants' as the expression goes is not emasculation when a man is made to do 'the woman's role', it's simply a declaration of who leads and who follows rooting from a once sexist expression, who's 'the power figure' essentially. 

Depending where you live as well, it can be unrealistic to think you could live there without a dual-income. Even when my mother was making fat stacks with her jobs in Cali, my father doing side jobs helped with keeping the rent flowing so that we wouldn't have to change our standard of life. Even now both work. 

Now what baffles me is how you can say this and then fall on how it's 'supposed' to be men working and women staying home. I'd personally tie that down more to individual genetics than overlaying it onto a gender binary.

Like damn. A man is working hard all day and he comes home hungry and tired to a mess and a miserable woman who does nothing cause it would make her feel like an underprivileged servant, LoL. I had one of those. Next.

I bet if you were the one saddled with cooking and cleaning that you'd just sit on your computer making 3D models and shit all day, calling it 'work' so that you can get out of doing real work.

What are you saying there ? Most women do not preserve their eggs. But no, it's not happening in the grand scheme.

It's becoming increasingly common, and has always been the sign of intelligence. I'd also argue the majorit of people aren't smart as a unisex point (albeit while arguing why women have more of an edge than men).

Even Idiocracy went there and that was made ages ago. 

You're preaching to the quire.

Choir*

Prenuptial agreements aren't even enough to guard one's wealth in the event our spouse monkey branches onto another relationship, and tries to rip us in half in the process. In my opinion, the willingness to sign a prenup no problem is a better sign of worthiness. Other than that, never let your mate/date/GF what have you, know how much you really have. 

Yes it is..?

Otherwise agreed, but this is always packaged as a 'man' making the point. If who I was with was wicked wealthy, I would not feel entitled to half their wealth. 

trying to read all of that gave me a fucking headache holy shit. TL;DR

Matrix said: 

trying to read all of that gave me a fucking headache holy shit. TL;DR

At least you tried. 🤷

Matrix said: 

trying to read all of that gave me a fucking headache holy shit. TL;DR

 Same. TL;DR. I read some. It always becomes a wall of text with that one, as he flings poo at every single detail.

.

.

.

Turncoat. Women are happier when they are submissive. She will be submissive to the man she wants to bang, and also the one she wants to marry. 

You can cry oppression or it doesn't have to be that way all you want. It doesn't change the fact that women are submissive to guys they want to be with, and as it turns out, when she does that she's happier than the women still waiting, as those women by nature will be submissive to their future mates. If it isn't so one day she'll meet Fabio and if the climate is right, she'll be submissive to him. Of course that doesn't mean she'll cheat or ditch her partner, but in other cases she will. And be happier. 

There is indeed a lot less happy couples these days, as living single is on the rise. Are women happier these days ? While some are I'd say not as much, as more and more women are angry and rebellious toward men, from how we sit to just being male, and it's become important for them that the female gender start taking up male dominated jobs more, which is fine, but the whole determination to compete with men at our own expertise and calling for "other" women to get jobs they really aren't interested in doing at scale, well that's part of the illness.  

Spatial Mind said: 

Matrix said: 

trying to read all of that gave me a fucking headache holy shit. TL;DR

 Same. TL;DR. I read some. It always becomes a wall of text with that one, as he flings poo at every single detail.

We're both guilty of going over the character limit Spats, you've shared many complaints over it. 

Turncoat. Women are happier when they are submissive. She will be submissive to the man she wants to bang, and also the one she wants to marry. 

You can cry oppression or it doesn't have to be that way all you want. It doesn't change the fact that women are submissive to guys they want to be with, and as it turns out, when she does that she's happier than the women still waiting, as those women by nature will be submissive to their future mates. If it isn't so one day she'll meet Fabio and if the climate is right, she'll be submissive to him. Of course that doesn't mean she'll cheat or ditch her partner, but in other cases she will. And be happier. 

There is indeed a lot less happy couples these days, as living single is on the rise. Are women happier these days ? While some are I'd say not as much, as more and more women are angry and rebellious toward men, from how we sit to just being male, and it's become important for them that the female gender start taking up male dominated jobs more, which is fine, but the whole determination to compete with men at our own expertise and calling for "other" women to get jobs they really aren't interested in doing at scale, well that's part of the illness.  

Why even reply to you if you won't even bother to read it? It's no wonder your perceptions on gender are harkening back from the dark ages, you don't even want to know the truth from it being too hard for your emasculation copes to fathom. 

When you're man enough to participate in a dialogue, rather than a monologue, let me know. 

So many words 🥴

Turncoat said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

Matrix said: 

trying to read all of that gave me a fucking headache holy shit. TL;DR

 Same. TL;DR. I read some. It always becomes a wall of text with that one, as he flings poo at every single detail.

We're both guilty of going over the character limit Spats, you've shared many complaints over it. 

Turncoat. Women are happier when they are submissive. She will be submissive to the man she wants to bang, and also the one she wants to marry. 

You can cry oppression or it doesn't have to be that way all you want. It doesn't change the fact that women are submissive to guys they want to be with, and as it turns out, when she does that she's happier than the women still waiting, as those women by nature will be submissive to their future mates. If it isn't so one day she'll meet Fabio and if the climate is right, she'll be submissive to him. Of course that doesn't mean she'll cheat or ditch her partner, but in other cases she will. And be happier. 

There is indeed a lot less happy couples these days, as living single is on the rise. Are women happier these days ? While some are I'd say not as much, as more and more women are angry and rebellious toward men, from how we sit to just being male, and it's become important for them that the female gender start taking up male dominated jobs more, which is fine, but the whole determination to compete with men at our own expertise and calling for "other" women to get jobs they really aren't interested in doing at scale, well that's part of the illness.  

Why even reply to you if you won't even bother to read it? It's no wonder your perceptions on gender are harkening back from the dark ages, you don't even want to know the truth from it being too hard for your emasculation copes to fathom. 

When you're man enough to participate in a dialogue, rather than a monologue, let me know. 

 Remember all those times I told you I'm not going to respond to a wall of texts and how you need to compact your replies into something more time considerate ? This time I decided I wanted to reply, but it gets too insane for my time and taste.

More often than not you'll break sentences off paragraphs then spiral the conversation into some nonsensical direction, after awhile ( years in this case ) it becomes more of a grievance to review your unlimited rebellion.

I do realize it's a good time for you to label me as a narcissistic asshole, but seriously, I know what to expect when I read that. It's filled with low blows, disagreement, and shit. I'd need to make TWO posts to reply to that and it'll be yet another effortlessly grim conversation that leads to nowhere.