Sociopath Community

Kestrel said: 

Edvard said: 

You people will miss Luna very soon.

 I agree with Trypt's style of moderation. It's very free form and very open, but everything is easily reversed. He's open to criticism and so are all the people he gave mod honestly.

 It is easy to moderate when people are trying to behave and don't intentionally ruin the usability for others. The moment someone challenges the mods, then things are truly revealed.

It's been a week, Primal is banned and people are being kicked and muted from other places of gathering for our community. If unruly elements push it, things will escalate, as they did with Cawk, as they did with Crave, as they eventually did with Luna.

I honestly cant wait

I love that you say it'll take six years more for you to believe in the success of this group's seemingly desperate need to stick together. 

You sit there continuing to sing praises for the former mad queen as if she's still looking over your shoulder even now. You're free, Ed, you can put away your Stockholm Syndrome. 

Turncoat said: 

Kestrel said: 

Edvard said: 

You people will miss Luna very soon.

I agree with Trypt's style of moderation. It's very free form and very open, but everything is easily reversed. 

You compared it to tk getting rid of meta, cawk's back in less than 6 hours.

This isn't too different from Ed's argument over how none of Luna's bans are ever permanent, honestly. 

...at least until some of the endgame bans anyway. 

There needs to be a system of consistency or else it'll mutate and fall apart. 

 There's enough variation there. Trypt isn't moderating like luna in the least bit. 

I personally would like a set of defined solid rules, but this type of moderation isn't awful and trypt isn't sperging out banning people because they made fun of him. 

The system always mutates, regardless of the rules. If anything strict rule set ups are harmed more when their few fundamentals are broken.

Edvard said: 

Kestrel said: 

Edvard said: 

You people will miss Luna very soon.

 I agree with Trypt's style of moderation. It's very free form and very open, but everything is easily reversed. He's open to criticism and so are all the people he gave mod honestly.

 It is easy to moderate when people are trying to behave and don't intentionally ruin the usability for others. The moment someone challenges the mods, then things are truly revealed.

It's been a week, Primal is banned and people are being kicked and muted from other places of gathering for our community. If unruly elements push it, things will escalate, as they did with Cawk, as they did with Crave, as they eventually did with Luna.

Luna is a special case and a unique person that held all of the power on SC. No one in power right now is less level headed than Luna and they also by their own accord dont want as much power as Luna had. This will not be the same as the old regime.

I'll prob react if I get banned but so far ggwp tony

Turncoat said: 

Spatial Mind said: 

I warned you... so you did it to yourself.

This kind of logic can become toxic. 

 That's a poor opinion. What's toxic is the action that kills the community. 

You post filth, fine, but that kind of faggotry is something we see then intend to forget, but when it's constantly posted several times a day it becomes a real issue when the image is forcefully burned into the memory of the user base who is utterly repulsed by it.

I'm not going to start bringing up names but there is a significant number of members that don't want to watch it anymore. It does more damage than good to the community when members are basically forced to stare into a toilet bowl full of shit. 

My logic is sound, because a community is better than none.

P.S. Ed's opinion is rigged therefore it holds no merit, again.

Edvard said: 

Kestrel said: 

Edvard said: 

You people will miss Luna very soon.

 I agree with Trypt's style of moderation. It's very free form and very open, but everything is easily reversed. He's open to criticism and so are all the people he gave mod honestly.

 It is easy to moderate when people are trying to behave and don't intentionally ruin the usability for others. The moment someone challenges the mods, then things are truly revealed.

It's been a week, Primal is banned and people are being kicked and muted from other places of gathering for our community. If unruly elements push it, things will escalate, as they did with Cawk, as they did with Crave, as they eventually did with Luna.

 I thought you believed in banning pedophiles Ed. But as you come charging head first on impulse, you find yourself standing up for one.

I don't expect an explanation from you cause your lack of humility will have your take on this make you look worse. This reply is more for others to note.

I think the bans are just. There are some members who need to keep the spam to a minimal. If your actions are upsetting and irritating the island; dont be surprised when you get voted off.

Personally i wouldn't allow pictures to be posted or shared in general chat. (Even though i enjoy it greatly) Nobody wants to see your ugly mug over and over again. Nobody wants to see the same gay ass photo again and again either. 

It should be embarrassing to the poster because its signifying that you have nothing valuable to contribute; so you just destroy the flow of chat and current conversations with pettiness. 

Suck it up buttercup; nobody loves you.

Kestrel said: 

Yeah I don't support cawk being kicked. There is no nsfw channel, the content is fine and where he posted it is allowed.

I also didn't support sandman being kicked for posting a lot of selfies. By the instances of these two scenarios blanc, slay, tpg and turq could all be potentially kicked for these reasons.

Don't like him, block him. He isn't breaking rules and the pic at most is posted once every 2-3 hours on average

 I can easily block him but a kick isn't a personal action, it's a measure to insure the continuation of the server.

Turquie, Blanc, Slay. They supply a lot of content, and though they post their selfies a lot, it isn't on the level of spamming up the chat log all day the way Sandman did. On discord the majority doesn't just block a bitch as even that is annoying with the notices of blocked messages. People just pack up and leave. 

It's funny how the self centered should be allowed to shoe off members and kill the community, meanwhile when I give them a tap on the wrist, I'm the one being judged by fewer people who thanked me.

Even Jim wanted Cawk banned, and it never went that far.