Found the thread where we discussed the 5 extinctions.
https://sociopathcommunity.com/Forum/Topic/11461/1/intelligent-design
I never used all caps at you. I Scientifically explained an event you missreprented and the fact that you construed the event as me spergy and crying and attacking you enforces Alice's point that you veiw everything as a personal opposition. Just like an Incel.
Your memory loss is showing.
lolwut?
You don't read my posts, I see.
I said any vote that wasn't for Biden was a wasted vote and therefore a vote for Trump.
You literally called me a trump-tard
And no, there are certain political views that are distinctly Libertarian right, no matter where on the political spectrum a person believes they are, or who that person votes for. You, and most other Americans would do well to take some poli sci courses.
And when did I ever say "beat"?
I said we would call on every last ally who would support us, do as much damage as possible to the US, and then go full scorched earth and nuke our own shit rather than let the Americans have it.
IF I were calling the shots in this imaginary war.
How it would actually play out irl is irrelevant bc it won't happen. Americans are too lazy to go to war with white ppl :P
You claimed US citizens would all kill each other with our guns then Canadians would come take the land/supplies left behind.
Oh lol you were there for that one?
I think I was joking that time.
Inqy was mocking Americans and their wall building xenophobia and he said "let's invade them and rewrite their constitution," and I said "nah, we're too cozy, so lets just wait for them all to kill each other"?
If so, I was most definitely joking :D
I bumped the thread. Boy you sure went on for a long time for it having been "just a joke"
Oh that was the thread you were talking about?
Yeah I was mostly playing.
But we weren't talking about a real war with real soldiers on that thread.
We were talking about a plague stricken dystopia where Americans fucked themselves like in every old apocalypse movie, weren't we?
And the Americans who would be attacking in that so-called war would just be a bunch of guys who play Fallout Las Vegas all the time or w/e
Making their first go at invading somebody in the absence of a workable government, and collapsing food supply chains?
Um... yeah sure. I'm not at all worried about a bunch of preppers.
We do have our own guns up here, you know.
And we have insanely shitty weather and 6+ months of winter every year.
Hell no I'm not worried about a bunch of preppers coming for me.
The southerners are the ones with the 12 month growing season, anyway.
Any American with half a brain knows to go south where the good food and the bikini chicks are, anyway.
No American contemplating the apocalypse says "yeah I would go to Canada to wade through 3ft of snow and rassle with bears and fight the Canadians for the strawberries that might be left over from last July's crop" lol
Found the thread where we discussed the 5 extinctions.
https://sociopathcommunity.com/Forum/Topic/11461/1/intelligent-design
I never used all caps at you. I Scientifically explained an event you missreprented and the fact that you construed the event as me spergy and crying and attacking you enforces Alice's point that you veiw everything as a personal opposition. Just like an Incel.
Um... no.
The fact that you feel compelled to correct somebody who's not even trying to be correct was what looked spergy.
Hint: that's what a joke is.
And it wasn't even a punching down or mocking sort of a joke (unless you count Delora and her reincarnation cult, but I get the feeling she does that occult stuff ironically and doesn't mind ppl poking fun at the notion.)
I was playing and joking around and you were comparing me to "those people" in your labs.
Can't remember who "those ppl" were, exactly, but you sounded totally offended by their presence, as if you believed they were in your school on your dime, leeching or smthg.
And you had absolutely no reason to compare me to ppl who leech.
Hell, that was even before I lost my job.
I mean, if you say "Knock knock" and somebody jumps into a long winded rant and starts correcting you, you would see the person as spergy, too.
That's what most people think when somebody feels compelled to correct a statement that was meant to be absurd and fun and starts comparing the joke maker to some annoying person in MARYLAND, and then goes on to compare the classmate to some welfare stereotype.
Bc absurd = funny.
Newsflash: most people who are cracking a joke know full well that what they're saying is only partly correct.
At the time, I only found your behaviour odd.
But the more it happened, the more I wondered if you just had issues, or if it was smthg personal, or if you'd heard some lies.
And sure enough. You started quoting WW3's clap trap last month.
That was when I dismissed you as a gullible sheep with extremely poor critical thinking skills.
So this is about Peach, I see.
So Imma tell you the same thing I told everybody else.
Go back to that very first day Peach and I met, and show me what I said to deserve her vitriol.
Prove that I actually deserved that attack.
Here's the rundown of what happened on the thread:
I poked some fun at Delora's weird reincarnation cult with my Children of Spacedust and Time hypothesis. I do love that particular way of looking at how life on earth came into existence, like I love Star Trek. And Pale Purple Shitstain responded as if she thought I was the one in the reincarnation cult.
Then I said that there were at least 3 and possibly as many as twenty mass extinction events in earth's history.
And she went totally spastic, like bitches do when they've heard a vile rumour or smthg, but they want to hold back until they have more evidence or w/e. But they can't hold it in and be civil, so they carp at things that aren't rlly a problem.
She was all like "YOU'RE WRONG. THERE WERE 5!!!"
Well duh. 5 is between 3 and twenty lol
And then she started ranting about how my so-called type always pisses her off when she's in her labs at school.
Wow, I literally don't even remember the first time we met,
And then she triedta tell me I have Alzheimer's lol
She's the one with the memory issues :D
she unironically has a very incel mindset
I see what you mean.
Her mindset and incel mindset have a similar structural ontology.
She has a huge ego and thinks she's successful despite being a miserable failed abortion that is a burden for society. Also she never takes responsibility for her own actions.
Yes, one of the foundation pillars of said ontology is a large ego and, I'm not so sure of this as of yet, could be one of the larger determining factors in the rest of the ontologies structures.
Fundamentally you have a large ego that is equally matched with insecurity, from which opposition forms.
The opposition between these two necessitate a scapegoat, in the case of the incel it is the opposite sex or larger metaphysical notions of the opposite in general (femininity, masculinity, patriarchy, matriarchy, order, chaos, etc)
These opposites are given inherent immutable essenia and through this generalizations can be made and usually broad ones that are irrational.
Many ontologies take on this form, but what is specific to the incel is the general relation between their egos and the opposition. They can't see merit in that opposition and they will irrationally lash out against in a desperate way, that desperateness being the intensity and continuity of the lashing out against the opposition.
Another part of the ontology is that it is the opposition from which this person derives their social condition and meaning, in other words this is how they justify their ego.
Xena examplifies all fo this and I am stuck between the though of it being a priori, that is inherent to herself, or merely something that manifests out of her interaction with the incels of this forum. There is prof of the former given that under any opposition with none incels she begins the same means of irrational lashing out but it does seem far more amplified when she argues with incels. The more she argues with you guys within the incel paradigm the more 'incel' like she seems.
I am not inclined to call her an incel but her thought processes at the least share the same ontology.
wow.... fascinating analysis
Why does this matter tho
like why do cav and tpg care about these random details of a person so much
what is the hyper focus for
as if it’s some compensation or retaliation
I just want to understand the MO behind these posts
Why does this matter tho
It doesn't, sweetness.
I see ppl all over this forum actually doing the vile or just plain stupid things these idiots accuse me of all the time, and they don't care.
Their rationale is simply that if somebody dislikes incels, then the way to really annoy that person is to call them an incel.
Or fat or freckled or w/e the person expresses annoyance at.
They don't actually care about the lies they make up as excuses to dislike me. They're just lazy trolls who don't know how to properly get under somebody's skin.
Hint: there are no female Incels for good reason. No woman, no matter how ugly, is ever involuntarily without sex. A woman can always get sex, and often with much younger men, several hotness points higher than she is.
Because men are like dogs and will fuck anything. They don't even need much alcohol, only enough to use as an excuse ;D
lolwut Alice?
That was the most peculiar hybridization of Freud and Hegel I've ever seen xP
Ofc I'm reacting to the incels on this forum.
Hint: you don't know me. You're also following the narratives these retards have invented, tho in a strange way. If the only thing a person ever says in your presence is "Ew gross. I'm not what you think I am. Yeah, I'm happy with what I've done with my life" bc the people around her are always attacking her, ofc she's going to sound vaguely narcissistic to the average person.
Has anybody who watched you box ever accused you of being bloodthirsty, violent and stupid? I mean, if the only time they ever see you is in the ring, they might actually believe that you do nothing outside of punching people in the face, amirite?
But no, lol. A person would have to be severely stunted socially to believe that all a boxer ever does is box.
Hint: I was referring to Alice watching me argue with SC assholes and tryinta concoct a theory that defines my entire personality. Like those nasty tabloid journalists who post pics of somebody scratching and tryta use that as 'evidence' that they're infested with some nasty parasite.
Brace yourself Alice. I'm about to use another analogy :P
Me arguing with incels and mimicking their nonsense to (metaphorically) spit it right back in their face, and being observed by you as an incel
Is as you boxing and being observed by some (hypothetical) doofus as a violent angry psycho with anger management issues.
(Unless I'm totally wrong and you are rlly an angry violent whack job who only boxes bc it's a legal way to maim ppl lol)
I believe this was the analysis of me that you were (over) reaching for:
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/Flanderization
;D
"The act of taking a single (often minor) action or trait of a character within a work and exaggerating it more and more over time until it completely consumes the character. Most always, the trait/action becomes completely outlandish and it becomes their defining characteristic. Sitcoms and Sitcom characters are particularly susceptible to this, as are peripheral characters in shows with long runs.
The trope is named for The Simpsons character Ned Flanders, who was originally depicted as a friendly, generous Christian neighbor and a model father, husband and citizen, thus making him a contrast to Homer Simpson. As seasons progressed he became increasingly obsessively religious to the point where he eventually embodied almost every negative stereotype of the God-fearing, bible-thumping American Christian evangelist.
Note that the key to this trope is in how the process is a gradual thing: the character starts relatively normal with a few quirks, the quirks become more prominent, then the quirks gradually become the character. If it is simply about how the character is different early on before the writers know what to do with them, that is Characterization Marches On.
In general, comedies, especially Sitcoms, fall into the trap of Flanderization because Character Development is far less important than Rule of Funny. Given a choice between getting a laugh or moving the story forward, getting the laugh will almost always take priority.
Flanderization doesn't have to be a bad thing — sometimes it can be used to expand on a background character's personality when they are brought to the foreground, or make an otherwise bland character stand out more. It can even be beneficial on a cast-wide scale: A comedy that has a cast full of zany, outsized personas will probably be funnier than one full of nondescript straight men.
See also Never Live It Down for when the character is more associated with some action or event than the character actually changing, and Unintentionally Sympathetic, when realistic quirks are mishandled by the writers. Compare Temporarily Exaggerated Trait, which is like flanderization but only done temporarily. Compare and contrast Early Installment Weirdness (as it applies to characters), with early depictions of a character being different from later ones simply because the producers hadn't figured out what role they should play in the story. Also see Forgot Flanders Could Do That, when a story brings back pre-Flanderized aspects of the character as a reminder that these traits are still there, even if you don't see them much any more.
The opposite to this trope is Character Development, naturally."
In a word, you've all created a caricature, and your caricature gets more ridiculous as time passes.
Again, you are what you present.
I have very little doubt that the way you are with your children, loved ones, or in real life in general is different than how you present yourself online - this is quite common.
However, what has been stated here, at least by myself, is merely an analysis of how you present yourself consistently in these circles.
So, if you are a caricature of your actual self so be it but that doesn't negate the reality that the caricature you present shares an ontology that is isomorphic with an incels.
I see ppl all over this forum actually doing the vile or just plain stupid things these idiots accuse me of all the time, and they don't care.
Like what?
I'm actually quite humble, thx.
Uhhh...
This forum is not getting hundreds of new members like luna's did after the Grandpa murderer hit the newspapers.
Two things:
A) Why would we want hundreds of new members, is that the bar of success or something?
B) Does it really make sense to compare to that event? On one hand you're comparing where we are currently to one of it's more highlighted times, and on the other you're almost advocating it be done again with words like this.
I think I was joking that time.
You mean you don't know?
In a word, you've all created a caricature, and your caricature gets more ridiculous as time passes.
It's a bit absurd to accuse people of Flanderizing you when that's been your M.O. from the start.
