lol you are grasping at straws, weirdo.
My parents planned me, right down to the groovy paisley baby booties, thx.
Are you projecting your fears about being a failed abortion on to me?
That was actually the first very Chinese sounding thing you've said :P
I'm actually quite humble, thx.
And define "successful" and show me how you're coming up to that standard.
As always, pics will be required before I believe a word that comes out of your lying hands :D
she unironically has a very incel mindset
I see what you mean.
Her mindset and incel mindset have a similar structural ontology.
She has a huge ego and thinks she's successful despite being a miserable failed abortion that is a burden for society. Also she never takes responsibility for her own actions.
Yes, one of the foundation pillars of said ontology is a large ego and, I'm not so sure of this as of yet, could be one of the larger determining factors in the rest of the ontologies structures.
Fundamentally you have a large ego that is equally matched with insecurity, from which opposition forms.
The opposition between these two necessitate a scapegoat, in the case of the incel it is the opposite sex or larger metaphysical notions of the opposite in general (femininity, masculinity, patriarchy, matriarchy, order, chaos, etc)
These opposites are given inherent immutable essenia and through this generalizations can be made and usually broad ones that are irrational.
Many ontologies take on this form, but what is specific to the incel is the general relation between their egos and the opposition. They can't see merit in that opposition and they will irrationally lash out against in a desperate way, that desperateness being the intensity and continuity of the lashing out against the opposition.
Another part of the ontology is that it is the opposition from which this person derives their social condition and meaning, in other words this is how they justify their ego.
Xena examplifies all fo this and I am stuck between the though of it being a priori, that is inherent to herself, or merely something that manifests out of her interaction with the incels of this forum. There is prof of the former given that under any opposition with none incels she begins the same means of irrational lashing out but it does seem far more amplified when she argues with incels. The more she argues with you guys within the incel paradigm the more 'incel' like she seems.
I am not inclined to call her an incel but her thought processes at the least share the same ontology.
I don’t understand why people on the internet expect other human beings on the internet to be like perfect exemplary citizens with zero flaws faults and have made no mistakes like some kind of god or Jesus like creature or something like a higher sitience with morality and values and just adhering to every cooked up standard in your mind that at a certain point just starts boiling down from generalized objective standards for human beings to just subjective opinions or interpretations/judgements of character based on how it makes the perceiver feel in that given moment / what it makes them project onto the person given their once again very subjective life experiences and perspectives that not all people understand or even know enough about to act accordingly not to offend the very specific judgement that may be imparted on them
and then, they aren’t just held responsible to these things, they experience ramifications as if it’s the viewers job to punish the person and make sure they are slain once and for all or just bullied off the internet because they don’t deserve to exist just because the person has decided they don’t like them, don’t ageee with them or their personality, they have flaws, or are offended by them in some way. Usually there is a misjudgement or a misperception going on during the judgement being imparted on them.
but yet on the same coin, the malice that is spread in such a malevolent manner by the viewer who holds the person to said standard is not judged themselves for being malevolent and losing their chill at people on the internet who are just random people and are never going to fit into the little perfect box in your mind that you want them to (because that’s absurd).
I’m not sure if it’s a desire to feel power over another individual, to make themselves look cool to a group of certain people, or what the MO exactly is behind doing all of this. But it’s a lot of trouble to go through just to impart your own misery into someone else’s day, and it’s ironic to me they make fun of someone for being lame or this or that, but then here they are the lamest one of all, the bottom of the barrel essentially, exhibiting the lowest standard of character and morality there is by being a classic hateful internet troll, which lacks originality and personality, is completely replaceable in that sense, and also is boring and unintelligent due to the redundancy and pointlessness to what hey are doing (accomplishing nothing with their time). it’s nothing to be proud of to behave in this way.
I’m not sure what kind of person makes an internet troll as I’ve never met one in person (I suppose they don’t get out much) but, if I had to guess it’s people with a lot of misdirected anger or an inability to properly deal with their emotions, and who also have distorted view points of life- possibly personality disordered. And thus are missing the entire point of what life is all about and how it beckons to be lived, by wasting all of their time on such petty concerns and minute details, toiling over someone they’ve never met. And over reacting to every small flare of emotion.
I don’t understand exactly why people do this or what they do and when there is lack of understanding is often where there comes judgement, so while I don’t want to judge the people who do troll, I just have one question. Why?
Or are they so out of touch with themselves and their actions they can’t even answer that question. Why do you do this?
and if it’s for stress relief relaxation enjoyment or leisure, why is it hobbies you enjoy come at the expense of another. What is it with having to have something against somebody that you don’t even know, as if everyone is constantly on trial.
Is it an inferiority?
You’re so concerned with perception of others but then make no effort to Maintain your own image to the same right standards, and don’t critique yourselves in a similar manner
and keep in mind, I use the word perception, of others. Because you truly don’t know who people are whom you’ve just met on the internet. A lot of the time, it is often a lot of misperception
as the art of orchestrating and getting across what kind of person you are in total , genuinely is more difficult over text than it would be if say you just passively lived with someone and learned who they were a bit that way.
when you are only learning about a person through small blurbs of text ona forum only pertaining to usually a few areas of subject matter. Essentially casual conversation. It’s not qualifiable for you to say that you know this person with total accuracy and in full.
It leaves a lot of holes and gaps where a total complete perception of a person and who they really are, what kind of person they are and what they really are like, cannot be in full circumference achieved.
There is a lot of gaps, and in the text, a lot of misperceptions occur. A lot. Of Misperceptions.
So in efficacy you truly don’t even know who this person is yet, act as if you do.
And then slap labels on them. Calling them delusional for example, or any other negative term under the sun. What for?
Ive seen these kind of people make a lot of effort to tear into other individuals with such a passion but to me it just seems like a waste of time. And then on the other hand, they don’t seem that social or willing to make friends with people. Only the ones who will put up with their abhorrent behavior, and they gang up together to act this way.
It’s, not only childish but, god does it get old. Most people find it off putting and want nothing to do with it.
lolwut Alice?
That was the most peculiar hybridization of Freud and Hegel I've ever seen xP
Ofc I'm reacting to the incels on this forum.
Hint: you don't know me. You're also following the narratives these retards have invented, tho in a strange way. If the only thing a person ever says in your presence is "Ew gross. I'm not what you think I am. Yeah, I'm happy with what I've done with my life" bc the people around her are always attacking her, ofc she's going to sound vaguely narcissistic to the average person.
Has anybody who watched you box ever accused you of being bloodthirsty, violent and stupid? I mean, if the only time they ever see you is in the ring, they might actually believe that you do nothing outside of punching people in the face, amirite?
But no, lol. A person would have to be severely stunted socially to believe that all a boxer ever does is box.
I believe this was the analysis of me that you were (over) reaching for:
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/Flanderization
;D
lolwut Alice?
That was the most peculiar hybridization of Freud and Hegel I've ever seen xP
You've mistaken the notion of 'opposition' for an idealism that is particularly Hegelian.
Hegel did not come up with this idea, he is in fact a few thousand years late in using the concept.
As for Freud, I've never read him nor do I know anything about him so I'll just take your word for it.
These are all subtle and irrelevant points but I wanted to clarify that I am not Hegelian in any proper way.
Ofc I'm reacting to the incels on this forum.
Hint: you don't know me. You're also following the narratives these retards have invented, tho in a strange way. If the only thing a person ever says in your presence is "Ew gross. I'm not what you think I am. Yeah, I'm happy with what I've done with my life" bc the people around her are always attacking her, ofc she's going to sound vaguely narcissistic to the average person.
Has anybody who watched you box ever accused you of being bloodthirsty, violent and stupid? I mean, if the only time they ever see you is in the ring, they might actually believe that you do nothing outside of punching people in the face, amirite?
But no, lol. A person would have to be severely stunted socially to believe that all a boxer ever does is box.
So you agree with me, interesting.
I believe this was the analysis of me that you were (over) reaching for:
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/Flanderization
;D
No, I am talking about a general ontology that is a parent structure of modes of argument or general ideologies such as mgtow, incel, neo-feminism, racial supremacy, etc.
They all have different symbologies but have equivalent ontologies, as such categorically they are canonical isomorphisms'.
Xena i feel like everyone here has given a chance at one point or another, it's not that other convince others that you're violently unlikable. You do that on your own. You go Turbo Retard sometime.
Btw, I've video chatted with cav and he is indeed asian and definitely not liyang(they sound more like billy tbh)
Wasn't the incel founder a female?
