Yeah. And you're asking if those particular arguments and thought modes are inherent to my personality (which would be the hallmark of a PD) or if they're just smthg I slip into when i'm being attacked by mgtows and incels.
And my answer was OFC I don't see the world like that all the time.
That's not the question.
My question is, is this ontology it inherent to you. As in, is this formula of argument something you constantly utilize, and this is seemingly the case given you use it against everyone, not just TPG and the like.
However, we can isolate this behavior to your online self if you - that doesn't really change much as your online self is still mode being projected by you.
But these dumb dumbs (TPG, Cav, etc) are the type of ppl who like to kick somebody and then cradle their boo-boos while they point their fingers and holler "COPS!! COPS!!" when said somebody kicks back.
It is not the kicking back that implies a isomorphism between your ontology and the was previously mentioned, it is the the way you kick back. That way is the structure of the ontology and it holds the same structure as the other groups.
And yes, I do a lot of mimicking and call back humour.
I'm getting lazy bc the Ned Flanders trip got old by about May of 2014.
You are what you present.
And your statements about "needing a scapegoat" were incorrect. When somebody threatens my kids or wrongfully accuses me of an atrocity, that person ceases to be human in my eyes. It's not some symbolic act to get past my own shit or w/e.
You do need scapegoats though, this is exemplified by your illusion that Peach or others don't respect you because some other user is manipulating them in private.
You are incapable of accepting that your behavior does not warrant respect and as such you do not receive it.
These idiots have been appallingly disrespectful, and if I ever meet them irl, they will pay for their threats and their false allegations.
But ofc we'll never meet irl.
Bc they're cowards who make anonymous threats aimed at strangers' children, rather than getting in a proper scrap with another man.
See this is an example of that ontology.
Replace idiots with woman or ethnicity and suddenly you come to the isomorphism.
These woman have been appallingly disrespectful, and if I ever meet them irl, they will pay for their threats and their false allegations.
But ofc we'll never meet irl.
Bc they're cowards who make anonymous threats aimed at men, rather than getting in a proper scrap with a man.
These niggers have been appallingly disrespectful, and if I ever meet them irl, they will pay for their threats and their false allegations.
But ofc we'll never meet irl.
Bc they're cowards who make anonymous threats aimed at whites' right to exist, rather than getting in a proper scrap.
This is just an articulation of some new applicable ideas I've come across and you are just a great object of analysis.