Best Evidence Yet of Voter Fraud in Pennsylvania
You can find many videos now of voter fraud proof, This is why they did not want witnesses present.
Nice.
.
Check this out. If this is for real it'll be beyond epic.
In a nutshell.
- The real ballots were printed by The Department of Homeland Security.
- As a part of a sting operation, each ballot was watermarked by a QFS Blockchain encryption code, invisible to the eye.
This mean every real ballot can be scanned and verified and matched with master records stored on a blockchain.
The master record for each ballot would probably contain the correct area and citizen each ballot belongs to. Long story short, any ballot rejected by the blockchain will be exposed as fraudulent.
Steve Pieczenik is a former deputy secretary of state.
We'll see.
Yes, we will see.
Fleccas Talks shows thousands of names of dead people that voted. Jesus Mama Mia
10,000 dead people VOTE in Wayne County, Michigan!
Voter registrations are not updated to remove dead people and people that moved away. The criminals use these dead people to vote.
This election is far from over.
Quoted from others.
"Here’s a list of 10,000 people that are confirmed deceased (cross referenced with Social Security Death Index) that requested and returned absentee ballots in Wayne County, Michigan. Are these all “clerical errors” too?
https://controlc.com/c17e91ba"
Name","Birth Month","Birth Year","Zip Code","Ballot Received Date","Birthday","Date of Death","Age today"
"AARON JAMES","7","1949","48188","10/7/2020","07/09/1949","02/01/1979","71"
"ABBOTT DAVID","5","1937","48532","10/8/2020","05/30/1937","11/06/2011","83"
"ABBOTT SHIRLEY","1","1935","48317","10/23/2020","01/15/1935","UNKNOWN","86"
"ABDOO ANN","5","1918","48331","10/13/2020","5/??/1918","UNKNOWN","103"
"ABELE GILBERT","10","1919","48382","10/12/2020","10/??/1919","UNKNOWN","101"
"ABNEY BERNETHA","3","1919","48208","NONE","3/??/1919","UNKNOWN","102"
"ABRO MARY","8","1950","48317","10/14/2020","08/03/1950","08/24/2008","70"
"ACKERMAN GARY","5","1947","48601","9/28/2020","05/20/1947","05/13/2002","73"
"ADAMOV BETHEL","5","1920","49015","9/29/2020","5/??/1920","UNKNOWN","101"
"ADAMS ALICE","11","1952","48864","10/12/2020","11/21/1952","01/27/2004","68"
"ADAMS ANN","1","1955","48838","10/21/2020","01/01/1955","04/25/2009","66"
"ADAMS BARBARA","1","1939","49097","10/1/2020","01/11/1939","03/04/2009","82"
"ADAMS BARBARA","7","1940","49010","10/17/2020","07/27/1940","04/08/2010","80"
"ADAMS BETTY","4","1932","49675","NONE","04/29/1932","07/06/2001","89"
"ADAMS CAROL","1","1942","48118","10/5/2020","01/12/1942","11/20/2003","79"
"ADAMS CAROL","12","1939","48327","10/2/2020","12/30/1939","11/05/2008","81"
"ADAMS CHARLOTTE","5","1948","48071","10/7/2020","05/03/1948","11/21/2005","73"
"ADAMS CYNTHIA","7","1953","48076","10/6/2020","07/08/1953","01/09/2001","67"
"ADAMS DAVID","1","1938","48187","10/3/2020","01/08/1938","08/01/1980","83"
"ADAMS DAVID","6","1948","48204","10/1/2020","06/04/1948","05/01/1986","72"
"ADAMS DAVID","7","1950","49093","NONE","07/11/1950","09/18/2007","70"
"ADAMS DEBORAH","4","1955","48114","10/12/2020","04/05/1955","12/11/1998","66"
Biden’s Vote Tallies Violate Benford’s Law, everyone else follow across the country, except for Biden in key races. This is a test for catching election fraud, used by the US State Department and forensic accountants.
lol looks like you beat me to it.
Do you think election processes should follow benford's law?
I'm still looking into it, very interesting though though.
----- From my in TPG's thread ------
Evidently the election has violated Benford's Law.
To put it simply, Benford's Law is a curve in which some frequency of numbers occur over. When a data set is contrained by the curve we say the data set follows benfords law which means it falls into the distribution.
Here's a more detailed explanation for those interested: http://assets.press.princeton.edu/chapters/s10527.pdf
Benford's Law has been used as means to detect fraud across a number of processes, one being voter fraud. The idea is that a unmanipulated voting process should obey benfords law, and when numbers are manipulated the manipulators will give preference to certain numbers that then violate the distribution.
If you're interested in how Benford's law is related to voting, here's two papers I found useful:
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/3B1D64E822371C461AF3C61CE91AAF6D/S1047198700012808a.pdf/benfords_law_and_the_detection_of_election_fraud.pdf
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e667/b8ad9f58992828ff820ddc8a005de754c5f5.pdf?_ga=2.67043500.340285523.1604599512-1614321896.1604599512
Examples,
I'm too ignorant to say if it's even appropriate to assume an election process should follow Benford's Law but nonetheless I think the idea is interesting and worth looking into, plus it's relevant the current discussion.
Biden’s Vote Tallies Violate Benford’s Law, everyone else follow across the country, except for Biden in key races. This is a test for catching election fraud, used by the US State Department and forensic accountants.
lol looks like you beat me to it.
Do you think election processes should follow benford's law?
I'm still looking into it, very interesting though though
That's a good question. It's amazing how many natural systems follow Benford's law. I would have to see more historical data, It looks awfully suspicious that key races are different than ALL the others. Hmmmm. That alone, at a minimum, points to places to look closely at the ballots.
I would like to see your ideas on the subject
Michigan county flips back to Trump, following repair of voting software "glitch"
Notice how ALL the glitches are in favour of Biden.
This shit goes on and on
"An election-software glitch in Michigan's Antrim County that had incorrectly directed Democratic votes to presidential candidate Joe Biden was fixed Friday, putting thousands of votes correctly into President Trump's totals.
The software had reportedly caused a significant number of votes to be allotted to Biden in a county that has for years been reliably red. In the presumed final count, Biden had originally led in the county by roughly 3,000 votes. Revised totals show that Trump won the county by around 2,500.
Addressing the alleged software glitch, Michigan GOP Chairwoman Laura Cox said Friday during a press conference that "47 counties [in Michigan] use this same software in the same capacity.""
