I can't wait for the dozens of youtube compilations of liberals crying. If donald trump loses, I will delete this account (and make a new one)
Don't forget about the bet Com
professional retard :)
I am curious how people will respond to a second wave of this. They've been all "Anyone but Trump" after the wake of protests and news scare tactics, so them seeing him (inevitably) win again's bound to be like an emotional electric chair.
Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
I am curious how people will respond to a second wave of this. They've been all "Anyone but Trump" after the wake of protests and news scare tactics, so them seeing him (inevitably) win again's bound to be like an emotional electric chair.
For some reason, people think Joe has it in the bag... if you think like that you would have to spend most of your day on twitter... I'm pretty confident in a Trump victory I even bet on it
professional retard :)
I am curious how people will respond to a second wave of this. They've been all "Anyone but Trump" after the wake of protests and news scare tactics, so them seeing him (inevitably) win again's bound to be like an emotional electric chair.
For some reason, people think Joe has it in the bag...
That "some reason" is denial. They think the polls on the news are an indication of anything, but even flipping between CNN and Fox shows blatantly non-correlative figures.
They think they're winning because that's what they've been programmed to think and because that answer's easier to garner hope for the future from, but truth of the matter is that even the Vice President people are using as justification for Biden has a history of scandal (involving Willie Brown to boot).
Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on
10/19/2020 7:00:00 PM
Should've learnt from 2016, polls don't mean shit
Except that's not really the take away from 2016:
"Should you trust the polls this year? Yes. But we understand that many people have lingering questions after 2016, even though Trump was just a normal polling error behind Hillary Clinton." - link
Should've learnt from 2016, polls don't mean shit
Except that's not really the take away from 2016:
"Should you trust the polls this year? Yes. But we understand that many people have lingering questions after 2016, even though Trump was just a normal polling error behind Hillary Clinton." - link
Still doesn't explain the skew between news networks.
Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Huh, nice.
While still a technical yes, wow they must be trying to avoid what happened last time. The polls looked much more skewed between networks before now to the point that I stopped even factoring them.
To harken to this line though:
if you think like that you would have to spend most of your day on twitter... I'm pretty confident in a Trump victory I even bet on it
How can the news ever hope to account for the Anon vote?
Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔