I'm going to wait on this, I don't know how personal this should be, I was definitely going to opt out of any private info, but the more I think on it, the more paranoid I slightly am on just posting it here. Maybe that's dumb and too paranoid but I'm going to wait. I got a friend who likes this stuff, so I'll let her analyze it and maybe I'll put it here in the future.
Man you shouldn't have posted this crap at all, wtf natal chart, u mental?
I don't really know much on this stuff, I'm not big on astrology, I'm a skeptic of it, but I recall Turncoat having an interest in it. As for "mental" Probably.
What and now you edited it out? Who the fuck gon give a shit about ur bday wtf paranoia much
I was referring to where I live. In the original chart it gives details of birthplace.
I don't want to give my birthday anyway. I'm not scared of them finding me through birthday, but birthplace is pretty crucial
Yeah right like some fag's gonna triangulate ur location from astral charts
That wasn't what I was referring to, there's a section that clearly gives birth data.
Posting your whole chart would give your birthday away within a two to three day span, to those who know how to reverse the process. The outer planets give away the year. The sun only gives away the month. The moon gives away the two to three day span. The ascendant gives away nothing but a general time of day, which of course wouldn't get you outed. So sun and ascendant are safe as far as protecting your identity goes. The planets are bullshit anyway, so you may as well hide them. Without the year, that widens the span for the moon as well. So posting your chart with only the planets hidden would have your birthday able to be found within more like a week-long frame, but still with no year attached. Which I think is pretty damn safe. But if you're still paranoid, you could just hide the moon as well and have the remaining information essentially give away nothing.
I've been becoming increasingly interested in Astrology as of late, in general my thoughts pertaining to causality have been running wild.
I've studied it historically as the science that it once was and never gave thought to the new age ideals that came with the turn of the 20th century.
It is an interesting hypothesis, I think it's just poorly posed. If posed less radically and more rigorously there could actually be stock in it which would be exciting given the cause of the effect would be interesting to explore.