Sociopath Community

%I think society will never become comfortable enough for masculine traits to lose their value. Humans will always find new frontiers and there will always be a need for people that act quick and think calm under pressure. Can you imagine an all female team of astronauts landing on Mars? The only way I can see them surviving is by adopting masculine traits and that defeats the base assertion that masculinity is going to become obsolete. Maybe in the extremely far future but by that point it's almost impossible to hypothesize without a 99% error margin. 

Tryptamine said: 

Overall, I don't think industrialization or how civic rights have changed makes much of a difference in how sexes behave. I think that happens at a genetic level, and beta males will still enjoy less sexual activity. And attractive women will still have their choice of the pick of males. This is how it's been, and it's how we are designed to be for the sake of producing successful offspring. Men won't be phased out, because by instinct the female seeks the masculine.

You don't suspect that women from not having to worry as much about babymaking could lead to different desires? If women can sleep around without babies as a consequence, they don't have to just consider their singular, best partner as a means of survival anymore. Sex is stress relief, and "slutty" behavior is moreso demonized by peers than genetics. There's been theories written over why women are louder than men for sex; The idea that it's meant to attract other nearby males to effectively lead to group sex, the highest chance of impregnation. If that area is capable of thriving while the consequences of it are ripped out of the narrative, who's to say that women wouldn't become more femme-harem driven, or that society wouldn't evolve towards a more polyamorous direction? Our base-desires do exist, but how they're utilized and which people don't get to have a good time is an aspect of our environment. 

We also still as a species have the room to adapt to our environment, and we also have the... advantage... of being able to control what that environment is. What is and isn't deemed gregarious is over cultural cues, what our environment has brainwashed us to desire, alongside our health-driven subconscious needs that are more foundational to the species. Even something as simple as controlling music trends can affect what people do and don't get laid for the next five years or so, and those in positions of power are liable to push their agenda towards gregarious trending for the sake of cultivating the next generation. 

As I've said many times before, humanity's being factory farmed by it's fellow humans. It's not insane anymore to figure that future generations are liable to have less of a T-factor based on what is and isn't deemed attractive being steerable. 

Xadem said: 

I think society will never become comfortable enough for masculine traits to lose their value. Humans will always find new frontiers and there will always be a need for people that act quick and think calm under pressure. Can you imagine an all female team of astronauts landing on Mars? The only way I can see them surviving is by adopting masculine traits and that defeats the base assertion that masculinity is going to become obsolete. Maybe in the extremely far future but by that point it's almost impossible to hypothesize without a 99% error margin. 

AliceInWonderland said: 

I can see what you're saying generally, but I'm wondering how occupation plays a role. 

More men are willing to take risk, hence you see them in riskier occupations. Usually this is precieved as occupations such as miltary, contrsuction, etc; but they also seem willing to take on more psychological risk and as such you see more men entrepreneurs, developers, etc.

I think it plays more into if passivity with a focus on socializing or pushing towards unknown territory is the goal. 

If we make it into space, men might have a chance. If we're biding our time on Earth, technology is helping us become more femme than before while "The Oldest Living Profession" is more-than thriving with webcams. 

Basically, men are the work horses while women are the breeders. Men's importance is entirely tied to how much value there is in fast, blind decision making that rewards luck in lieu of long-term planning. If we phase out the need for war and evolve towards a one-world government, women will become even more powerful as long as they are "the desired sex". 

Men being "the hunter" will ultimately just make them the one baited by carrots on sticks. 

As a result you see men dominating in just about every major technological field. A man dominates logistics, a man dominates information networks, a man dominates space travel, a man domiantes batteries, a man is dominating AI and ML, a man is dominating finance, and a man is dominating computer-brain interface technology. 

Females may be the default gender but men still rule technology and that pace has only sped up since the information age has rise. For woman to be the power gender they are going to not only change occupation quick but also learn to dominate them. 

As women are given more chances, this gap will shorten (I'd argue similarly about race). It's mostly a factor of environment, and a lot of occupations we see as essential could very easily be done by a machine. 

Unless machines become good enough to be sexier than people, women have a notable advantage in the times to come. Once asexual reproduction is accomplished through them, men will be entirely fetish in their existence from no longer having an essential role in procreation. They could be made sterile at birth as a dystopian practice and humanity would live on. 

Tryptamine said: 

Alice said:

Females may be the default gender but men still rule technology and that past has only sped up since the information age has rise. For woman to be the power gender they are going to not only change occupation quick but also learn to dominate them.

Women are on the rise in STEM fields. But I don't think "domination" is built into most of them. There are exceptions, but typically testosterone is the molecule involved.

The alternative is that we could push all sorts of social agendas and reframe it all, by fast-tracking narratives that all people are inherently the same. Then instead of a testosterone environment, we have a world run by estrogen. Basically Portland for the last 120 days.

 And it depends on the stem field, there is an uptick but mostly in Biology, Chemistry and some (and I mean only a few) in Computer Science. I rarely see females in Mathematics and Physics, which are fundamentally the most powerful of all given you can do any of the others with them. 

I could see woman taking over politics (ideologically a lot already have) and then just subverting everything else as we've seen with the attempt on twisting biology. 

Interesting enough it seems on the theory end of things, and i mean across all fields, a movement of categorical theory has been on the rise. By Catigorical theory I mean we have a set of theories that we just use in different situations, in this set of theories includes theories that fundamentally contradict one another yet still has its uses. This is hard to explain because I've never articulated it until now but essentially I've seen a mass rejection of objectivity across STEM. What I mean by this is that we've reached an interesting point where we have tons of competing theories, all fundamentally different in important ways, with their own followers (it's almost religious) and using their theories for productive engineering (that engineering is derived from the perspective of the theory so it's hard to say if it could be done with out the theory even if the theory is technically wrong. 

Tryptamine said: 

Woke:

The most beautiful of women choose to mate with the most brutal of men, instead of magnificent gentlemen like myself got me.

Legga said: 

Tryptamine said: 

Woke:

The most beautiful of women choose to mate with the most brutal of men, instead of magnificent gentlemen like myself got me.

 The words of a beamer boi. 

AliceInWonderland said: 

 The words of a beamer boi. 

What the hell

Xadem said: 

%I think society will never become comfortable enough for masculine traits to lose their value. Humans will always find new frontiers and there will always be a need for people that act quick and think calm under pressure. Can you imagine an all female team of astronauts landing on Mars? The only way I can see them surviving is by adopting masculine traits and that defeats the base assertion that masculinity is going to become obsolete. Maybe in the extremely far future but by that point it's almost impossible to hypothesize without a 99% error margin. 

You think men are calm? lol