This dumb fucking nigger has lost tons of arguments against me. Legga is a overrated smart as who is actually got a fucking iq of 94 a typical nigger iq. Fuck legga that dumb fucking smart aleck prick.
I've told people when they've bested me, and openly have respected and given props in their character descriptions when called to.
To think that you win all arguments here is madness, I respect my losses for how they've otherwise changed me and taught me things. Winning's what's no fun, as all it serves to do is reaffirm where you already were.
I would never spend months and months defending a losing argument.
I would for the sport of it, but it'd have to be sporting instead of merely repetitious.
Inquirer, name your rules. Who is the moderator?
True, who would be treated as unbiased here?
No one is unbiased here. That is especially true for the few of us who's actually read the thread to begin with.
I can't think of any specific rules we need. The one request I have is for us to not get stuck on specific words and instead try to understand the point being made.
6 pm also doesn't work for me. I don't think I'll have time on Saturday after 1 pm.
No one is unbiased here. That is especially true for the few of us who's actually read the thread to begin with.
I mean for a mediator, who here would you both agree is without a side that is otherwise willing to moderate it?
Just want to mention I'm available all of Sunday so perhaps it's easier to work something out then?
I'm also open for doing this in voice chat, by the way. Normal chat is fine though.
I mean for a mediator, who here would you both agree is without a side that is otherwise willing to moderate it?
I'm not sure what kind of moderation is needed beyond making sure we stick to the argument, but for that you'd need to have read the thread. I think we'll manage fine without a designated moderator.
Just want to mention I'm available all of Sunday so perhaps it's easier to work something out then?
I'm also open for doing this in voice chat, by the way. Normal chat is fine though.
Normal chat would make it easier for witnesses, and for re-logging it so we can all see who won.
I kinda figured it'd just be in the public chat here.
I mean for a mediator, who here would you both agree is without a side that is otherwise willing to moderate it?
I'm not sure what kind of moderation is needed beyond making sure we stick to the argument, but for that you'd need to have read the thread. I think we'll manage fine without a designated moderator.
I mean... I'm caught up on it. I'm pretty sure I've read that topic cover-to-cover at least four times by now.
Surely I can't be the only one?