Message Turncoat in a DM to get moderator attention

Users Online(? lurkers):
10 / 120 posts
Posts: 32798
0 votes RE: I challenge Legga to a ...

For 'merican times (assuming Legga agrees to bumping it to two hours earlier)

West Coast duel time: 2am

East Coast duel time: 5am


If he doesn't, we just add two hours. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
last edit on 9/23/2020 3:22:58 PM
Posts: 3
0 votes RE: I challenge Legga to a ...

they could both just declare themselves the winner without any means of verification

 ^ this is SC in a nut shell. When does anyone ever think they lost an argument? 

last edit on 9/23/2020 7:24:32 PM
Posts: 419
0 votes RE: I challenge Legga to a ...

Actually, can we make it 6 PM CEST?

Posts: 32798
0 votes RE: I challenge Legga to a ...
Lola said: 

they could both just declare themselves the winner without any means of verification

 ^ this is SC in a nut shell. When does anyone ever think they lost an argument here? 

I've lost many. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 5402
0 votes RE: I challenge Legga to a ...

I lose 9/10 arguments I engage in

Posts: 32798
1 votes RE: I challenge Legga to a ...
Legga said: 

Actually, can we make it 6 PM CEST?

A duel at high noon (East Coast time)?

How Classically Western of you. 

Ę̵̚x̸͎̾i̴͚̽s̵̻͐t̷͐ͅe̷̯͠n̴̤̚t̵̻̅i̵͉̿a̴̮͊l̵͍̂ ̴̹̕D̵̤̀e̸͓͂t̵̢͂e̴͕̓c̸̗̄t̴̗̿ï̶̪v̷̲̍é̵͔
Posts: 3
0 votes RE: I challenge Legga to a ...
Lola said: 

they could both just declare themselves the winner without any means of verification

 ^ this is SC in a nut shell. When does anyone ever think they lost an argument here? 

I've lost many. 

 You've lost thousands tbh, but you never admit it. :D

Posts: 5402
0 votes RE: I challenge Legga to a ...

I think you should all pick out 1 argument you've lost and publicly admit to doing so by posting in the thread in which you lost

Posts: 419
1 votes RE: I challenge Legga to a ...
Lola said: 

they could both just declare themselves the winner without any means of verification

 ^ this is SC in a nut shell. When does anyone ever think they lost an argument here? 

I've lost many.

I `lose` on a daily basis because I work with people who are smarter than me and need to engage in topics where I don't have enough domain knowledge. I have a relatively small ego, so I can tolerate it. If I'm wrong, I want to know I'm wrong. I would never spend months and months defending a losing argument.

 

Inquirer, name your rules. Who is the moderator?

last edit on 9/23/2020 7:37:07 PM
Posts: 2266
0 votes RE: I challenge Legga to a ...
AliceInWonderland said:
Thanks guys, I really needed that reassurance.

Why ask questions if you don't expect answers? 

If they didn't have at least one witness, they could both just declare themselves the winner without any means of verification, and without enough witnesses they could claim individual bias to make themselves feel better. 

I always expect answers because when all else fails I know you will come to the rescue. 

Posted Image

 A content superhero! 

10 / 120 posts
This site contains NSFW material. To view and use this site, you must be 18+ years of age.