TL;DR, it's the same old long-winded storytime by an offended SJW who wants to cherry pick sources and is annoyeed if he can't. I'll wait for someone else to respond.
In the meantime:
Give me an example of how your methodology can address a claim that objects can move faster than the speed of light based on these studies:
https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2007/2007.07835.pdf
https://phys.org/news/2015-10-galaxies-faster.html
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/faster-than-the-speed-of-light/
No matter how much you try to counter-cite papers unless you're an expert you will have no way to show which methodology is correct, so you will be required to rely on the scientific consensus and what the experts say which in this case is the recognition that there is no good evidence to prove that objects can move faster than the speed of light. It's not a theoretical but a practical limitation.