You're asking a bunch of questions, and if he were to take the time to answer each and every one of them you wouldn't grant him any reciprocation.
For the size that your reply post is, you still continue to not address his points or sources beyond calling them "crackpot". He has no reason to address you further when you aren't actually speaking to him, but rather towards an SJW strawman.
Turncoat is still raging at me?
Inquirer already admitted that his epistemology doesn't rule out crackpot papers (papers that are not generally accepted and don't have robust conclusions that are accepted by the scientific community) and he will keep citing them. The moment he agrees to a common epistemology which doesn't allow citing crackpot papers I will address them papers. Until then, I will not waste my time or his, and since he already agrees that we are stuck I wanted to move on to a more interesting topic.
Besides I already am satisfied with the result
Satisfied with quitting more like, since you're clearly outgunned here.
You've been trying to find ways to give up on this for a while now, which is funny considering how much you haven't been participating in the first place.
Inquirer you are of course free not to engage on the biology topic if it offends you too much.
He did engage with it, at least arguably more than you have visited other people's topics.